A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
Moderator: bbmods
A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
I was thinking the other day about a few of the players from the Eagles who got into trouble during the drug troubled years of the Eagles. Most noticeably, the late Chris Mainwaring and Ben Cousin, who I understand may be in a mental institution now (after a bunch of arrests for bizarre behavior last year). Now I don't know if the Eagles troubles during this period was limited just to these two blokes, I doubt it.
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
Re: A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
There was also a midfielder whose name eludes me at the moment, who OD'd on a WCE end of season trip in the USA & came very close to death. Everyone knew what had happened but nothing was done as the AFL were unable to access the medical records.E wrote:I was thinking the other day about a few of the players from the Eagles who got into trouble during the drug troubled years of the Eagles. Most noticeably, the late Chris Mainwaring and Ben Cousin, who I understand may be in a mental institution now (after a bunch of arrests for bizarre behavior last year). Now I don't know if the Eagles troubles during this period was limited just to these two blokes, I doubt it.
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
- The Prototype
- Posts: 19193
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
- Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Re: A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
I'd wonder why the AFL hasn't done more, after Mainwaring's death I'd have thought that they'd have started to make sure players get help but then you have Tuck and Libba Jr have issues in public and they're banned but there's no duty of care there.E wrote:My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
Nowadays the AFL knows whose doing what drug, but probably should be organising them help if they're not on the banned drugs rather than just giving out strikes.
I'm not sure the beginning of either Chris or Ben's drug use, but when a lot of it started coming out Mick wasn't there so it would be hard to do much. I suppose had he known about the issues maybe he'd have been able to help.
- Mountains Magpie
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:50 pm
- Location: Somewhere between now and then
You can't be successfully sued for defamation if you are telling the truth.5 from the wing on debut wrote:Thank's Daniel. I wasn't quite truthful. I was aware of the name but even though this is a notice board there is no immunity from defamation laws. If something is defamatory this board assists the plaintiff by publishing the amount of views the post has received.Daniel wrote:Chad Fletcher
MM
Spiral progress, unstoppable,
exhausted sources replaced by perversion
exhausted sources replaced by perversion
Re: A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
FFS, Mick left them at the end of 1999.E wrote:I was thinking the other day about a few of the players from the Eagles who got into trouble during the drug troubled years of the Eagles. Most noticeably, the late Chris Mainwaring and Ben Cousin, who I understand may be in a mental institution now (after a bunch of arrests for bizarre behavior last year). Now I don't know if the Eagles troubles during this period was limited just to these two blokes, I doubt it.
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
But they were his boys...RudeBoy wrote:FFS, Mick left them at the end of 1999.E wrote:I was thinking the other day about a few of the players from the Eagles who got into trouble during the drug troubled years of the Eagles. Most noticeably, the late Chris Mainwaring and Ben Cousin, who I understand may be in a mental institution now (after a bunch of arrests for bizarre behavior last year). Now I don't know if the Eagles troubles during this period was limited just to these two blokes, I doubt it.
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
- Krakouer Magic
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:16 am
Re: A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
This is a absolute joke of a thread on so many levels. How many players tested positive to PED's under Malthouse at Collingwood? Under your logic Bucks just didnt do enough to stop Thomas and Keefe snorting coke and getting done for PED's.RudeBoy wrote:FFS, Mick left them at the end of 1999.E wrote:I was thinking the other day about a few of the players from the Eagles who got into trouble during the drug troubled years of the Eagles. Most noticeably, the late Chris Mainwaring and Ben Cousin, who I understand may be in a mental institution now (after a bunch of arrests for bizarre behavior last year). Now I don't know if the Eagles troubles during this period was limited just to these two blokes, I doubt it.
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?
I don't particularly want to bring this up, but under your logic I guess Matthews is responsible for Darren Millane (god rest his soul) too. Are Collingwood and Port Adelaide jointly responsible for JMac's (RIP) death?
Coaches really have very little control over the off feild behaviour of individual, or a group of, players. Didn't we have a load of guys hair test positive for drug use recently? That's one thing I don't blame Bucks for. He has f@ck all control over what players do in their own time. Young blokes will always test boundaries and experiment with booze and drugs.
All a club can do is provide good education on the subject matter, advise them to think about the consequences and then hope to god they make the right decision. If the club finds out about a "drug culture" then I guess the club can delist or trade them off or offer counselling.
I mean seriously, you dredge up this WCE sh!t and we just redrafted two players that admitted cocaine use and tested positive to PED's. From a hardline point of view people could say Collingwood is soft on drugs. But from a rational point of view I commend the club for giving the guys a second chance.
To unload the WCE issues onto Malthouse is just f@cking ridiculous. Have some respect for a Collingwood premiership coach.
- Member 7167
- Posts: 5144
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:21 pm
- Location: The Collibran Hideout
I personally think that seeing that MM left in 1999 you would have to give him the benefit of doubt and assume that he bears little to no responsibility for what occurred after he left. I have some issues about MM's relationship with players but he should not be looked upon as being responsible for this mess.
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday
- 3rd degree
- Posts: 14200
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: John Wren's tote
- Been liked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: A Mick Malthouse (WCE) Post
I wish he wasn't so worried about Chad Morrison.jackcass wrote:But they were his boys...RudeBoy wrote:FFS, Mick left them at the end of 1999.E wrote:I was thinking the other day about a few of the players from the Eagles who got into trouble during the drug troubled years of the Eagles. Most noticeably, the late Chris Mainwaring and Ben Cousin, who I understand may be in a mental institution now (after a bunch of arrests for bizarre behavior last year). Now I don't know if the Eagles troubles during this period was limited just to these two blokes, I doubt it.
what I think is interesting is that no one really focuses on the fact that Mick Malthouse was the coach at that time. I wonder why nothing stuck on him for their behavior.
Listening to Terry Wallace talk about his meeting with Cousins, blind freddy would have known these guys were on the gear in a serious way.
My question is why didn't Mick do more to help these kids. Doesn't the club have a responsibility to their players to take care of them?