Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 1:57 pm
Yep - The AFL said they won't as they are weak as water.piester wrote:If Essendon finish last this season will they get the number 1 selection in the next draft?
Why should the Profit from Cheating?
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
http://go-pies.com/
Yep - The AFL said they won't as they are weak as water.piester wrote:If Essendon finish last this season will they get the number 1 selection in the next draft?
Well People in the Media think players where Hard Done By and Should be able to Appeal.Johnno75 wrote:Looks like it's officially over. Essendon appear to have accepted the verdict of CAS, no appeals this time.
Dave it won't happen, AFL agreed to be bound by WADA's rules, players agree to be bound by AFL.Dave The Man wrote:Well People in the Media think players where Hard Done By and Should be able to Appeal.Johnno75 wrote:Looks like it's officially over. Essendon appear to have accepted the verdict of CAS, no appeals this time.
Real Boys Club
I know that but the Media and People in the AFL Industry will try and make it look like the Players got the Raw End of the Dealdroversdog65 wrote:Dave it won't happen, AFL agreed to be bound by WADA's rules, players agree to be bound by AFL.Dave The Man wrote:Well People in the Media think players where Hard Done By and Should be able to Appeal.Johnno75 wrote:Looks like it's officially over. Essendon appear to have accepted the verdict of CAS, no appeals this time.
Real Boys Club
WADA sent it to CAS therefore its a done deal, no appeal is possible.
Nope - because the play for Collingwood and not the AFL Favourite Victorian Team the Peptide Bummers69 years a MAGPIE wrote:Reading the AFL website am I correct in interpreting what is said:
1. suspended players will still get paid
2. 5 rookies to be upgraded
3. 10 supplementary players to be added
4. AFL to give EFC extra money to meet payment of supplementary players
Why 1 and 4? Is that normally the case. Are Keefe and Thomas treated the same way?
That generally happens in a time of crisis at most clubs, with us being no exception when the story about Keefe and Thomas first escalated in the media and when Maxy and Shaw were implicated in the betting saga in 2011.Daicos Mullets wrote:Interestingly, the background at Essendon's press conference had only Essendon logos.
https://twitter.com/EssendonFC/status/6 ... 4197909504
Does that confirm that the sponsors have jumped off-board, or are at least seriously considering their options? Given the massive costs that Essendon have incurred so far, loss of sponsors would be a crippling blow, particularly on top of additional payments to top-up players and highly likely legal action against the club.
Not sure whether the suspended players get their full pay. I think there are some WADA rules regarding the payments.69 years a MAGPIE wrote:Reading the AFL website am I correct in interpreting what is said:
1. suspended players will still get paid
2. 5 rookies to be upgraded
3. 10 supplementary players to be added
4. AFL to give EFC extra money to meet payment of supplementary players
Why 1 and 4? Is that normally the case. Are Keefe and Thomas treated the same way?