Pre-Match: Collingwood v Fitzroy Bears, all comments here...

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
collingwoodjoe
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 4:29 pm

Post by collingwoodjoe »

I like the changes, we bring in another runner in Johnson and another Hard body in the middle in Burns, we create more space for Cloke and Pebs by not bringing in a third tall forward and if we need one we can use the resting ruck, and Egan can play tall up there as well.

They have stacked up with talls, if they win the supply it will pay off, if we can hold our own we should be able to run them off thier feet with the midfield rotations.

Egan can also play 3rd tall back, he has a great running jump, so our tall options back there are Brown, Wakes, Maxwell, Goldsack, O'Brien, Egan and even Heath can at least contest in the air against the big boys with his superior anticipation and courage.
go pies!
User avatar
jimbeam
Posts: 2109
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:05 am

Post by jimbeam »

I am not sure about the changes.

I have faith in Johno, but its a concern if he is not switched on 100%.

Brisbane have gone tall, and all i can think of is Wood playing majority ruck while fraser floats to find some form.

we better run them ragged or we will get smashed down back..
Last edited by jimbeam on Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22174
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 150 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Good changes imo. I had earlier thought Clarke would be dropped but then thought MM would probably give him another week. It's probably a good wake-up call for young Marty at this stage of his career. I predict that once he earns his spot back he will never be dropped again. The other unlucky player is Reid, but he will no doubt get his chance very soon. This looks like the fastest side we've had for quite a while. The presence of both Burns and Johnno around the packs will make an enormous impact as they are both physical players. This will be a tough game, and we look tougher on paper than the Bears. Pies by 38 points.
User avatar
Pies4Life
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:21 am

Post by Pies4Life »

lol i picked the changes and i think its the right mix

Rocca Cloke and fraser/Wood pushing foward is fine, playing Reid and we would be too tall

Now we have more run which is what we need to combat the lions midfield
Premiers #08
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

All right, we'll go with the selected team.
But if i see Hooper and Brennan running amok again like R.17-2007, i'll projectile vomit like i haven't spewed since 2003 Grand Final.
I demand and expect nothing less than a 20 goal turn-around of that result. No excuses - the list is full.

Dyso
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
pietillidie
Posts: 16634
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by pietillidie »

piedys wrote:All right, we'll go with the selected team.
But if i see Hooper and Brennan running amok again like R.17-2007, i'll projectile vomit like i haven't spewed since 2003 Grand Final.
I demand and expect nothing less than a 20 goal turn-around of that result. No excuses - the list is full.

Dyso
If the boys are half as pumped as I am for this one then the only players running amok will be wearing the B&W!
User avatar
The Collingwood Turtle
Posts: 1320
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Ponsford Stand N32

Post by The Collingwood Turtle »

User avatar
melliot
Posts: 5179
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by melliot »

melliot wrote:Peter Daicos was on SEN this morning and said he thought Ego could be the replacement deep forward for Ruzza. Tend to agree. Gives us some good mobility. Ego is a little soft (maybe with some confidence will harden up a bit more and want to get involved), but has good pace and height as a leading forward moving deep or up to the flanks/wing. Also gives us another midfield rotation.

In fact I thought we functioned better when Ruzza went off. As I've said before, Ruzza is one dimensional and if that dimension doesn't work he is almost a liability. Anyone agree?

Wouldn't drop racer either. Was easily one of our best. Towelled up Headland in the middle and the Dockers moved him to F50 to prevent Racers pace advantage over him.

I'm a big fan of Reid and want him to get Games (Also in my Supercoach team!). Hard to argue for him to get a spot when Ego can play his role and rotate midfield and played well last week. Although Ried would strech the Lions defense.

So with Ego going forward, this leaves a midfield spot for either Johno or Burnsy. Both IMO are walk ups to our side if fully fit and match hardened. I predict Johno is in for a big one this year (like 2006). Has been playing really well in preseason games too. He also bring in good experiance, pace and leadership.

Also hard to leave out the Captian! Although I'm unaware of his fitness. Only played one preseason game and got hurt. Does he need another Praccy game? If fit play him IMO. OBree is one of our few clearance players. Burns would add to this.

So IMO.

Out: Ruzza In: Johno
Out: Clarke In: Burns (If ready to go)

Just think Clarke may need a game or 4 in the twos to get his form and feel for the game back . Just seemed a little lost to me. Not that he had a shocker. Just needs to get that awareness back. He did do some real nice things under pressure too.

Its a tough one. But a good problem to have
Gee, I occasionally get one right!! Some quote about Monkeys and shakespear comes to mind! :)
User avatar
ktszyu1
Posts: 1675
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 10:12 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by ktszyu1 »

accountabilityPlease wrote:IMHO Henderson, Brown, Bradshaw puts the balance of key defenders vs forwards well and truly in their favour, especially if one of their rucks drops back and / or Brennan goes to town on us again.

Once again Harry will have to play above his height along with Maxy not able to be the utility he has been but a key defender. How we use Goldie will be interesting too.
Bring in Anthony as well! :lol:
"We're goin places."
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 23 times
Contact:

Wood Tonight

Post by Dave The Man »

Do you Reckon he can beat Leuy and Charman?

I reckon he could at least break even with them and He could be very good up foward giving us a Massive Full Foward to Kick Too :D
I am Da Man
User avatar
uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Posts: 4929
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Under negotiation

Post by uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR »

It's going to be an interesting contest!!
Will Wood will start on the bench again??
User avatar
Zakal
Posts: 5076
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 3:30 pm

Post by Zakal »

I want Wood to take the first bounce (although will this damage Frasers confidence?)...he seemed to have no problem with Sandilands size, Charman is of similar built but MUCH shorter.

It Wood starts to win a few hitouts on Charman, Charman will no doubt try and physically rough him up...in which case i wouldnt mind seeing Cloke or Rocca for a couple of bounces just contesting for the purpose of smashing Charman, then letting Josh take over and returning Wood when Leuy starts.


Dont expect Wood to beat either, Charman is more experienced, and Leuy is probably more talented. Looking for a good show.
User avatar
kickit2me
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:02 am
Location: Sai Yok Noi

Post by kickit2me »

"And that effort by Ezard was pathetic" - Don Scott.
User avatar
The Truth
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:14 pm

Post by The Truth »

piedys wrote:All right, we'll go with the selected team.
Thanks for your permission.
The truth is out there!
User avatar
bwphantom
Posts: 4375
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 8:01 pm
Location: Brisbane QLD
Contact:

Post by bwphantom »

Storms forecast. And has been raining in Brissy Today. May be as wet and sloppy as a swingers club.
All this may be summed up in one word - CHARACTER - and if that is not worth developing, nothing is.

Jock McHale
Post Reply