Post Match. Pies blitz Bombers. All comments.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7709
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 185 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

warburton lad wrote:Caroline Wilson said we were lucky in 2022 and would finish 10th this year.

I'm assuming she has published a retraction this morning....????

Or were we just extraordinarily 'lucky' in 2023...

Congrats to all at the Club.

Let the 'real season' begin...
There are journos at The Age who are saying Geelong was the best team this year and unlucky
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

LaurieHolden wrote:WHE a.k.a. as 'The Ghost' had 20 disposals (17 kicks and 3 handballs) and 417 meters gained, near double on his season average, and 10 marks.
I viewed it as one of his best games this season. Provided some vital link running.
Thought the same thing. His gut running really highlights in comparison Steele's drop off since returning from injury.
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
BazBoy
Posts: 11073
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 43 times

Post by BazBoy »

Sidey has had patches of good footy but not sustained over 4 qtrs

I would hope that in a GF his good patches were for longer and used when the experience counts
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3842
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 202 times
Been liked: 185 times

Post by LaurieHolden »

A very quiet night by his lofty standards. 248 meters gained. He'd normally rack up 300+ by 3 quarter time.
I forgive most, but my benchmark endeavour stat is always tackles. He had 1 tackle!
Fin Macrae had 37% game time and racked up 8...

He was well off his tucker last night, suspect he went into self preservation mode with the real stuff to come. With 306 under his belt, I'll let him off this time...rest up old fella.
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26206
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 230 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

That Scott, like his bro, is a sore loser, must run in the fam. Bitched bout the players the Dons had out but NO mention of the four elite stars we had out, had they all played, we would have won by 100 points, Go and suck a lemon Scott, up yours. !
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
BazBoy
Posts: 11073
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 43 times

Post by BazBoy »

I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
woodys_world69
Posts: 2230
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Brisbane
Been liked: 34 times

Post by woodys_world69 »

i like WHE as sub
gives us flexibility
User avatar
Gerry Cooper
Posts: 888
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:49 am
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 47 times

Post by Gerry Cooper »

A good win against a very poor opposition. As Buckley said, it was a "soft kill" but there were some good things for us in it.

Ginnivan consistently deciding to stand up and take the tackle is a big positive for him and a sign of real progress in his game.

Cox taking a few good marks in the second half was important to see and a good confidence booster for him, considering he had been nowhere near them the last few weeks.

W.HE showed why he is a regular in our side. He can play both ends of the ground well and is creative and quick thinking with the ball usually.

Nice game by Mitchell too I thought. He really played up to his previous form last night.

Howe was the leader down back. Maybe that's his first choice position and only to be used forward when we are under pressure.

Oleg was dynamic and creative though I wonder if the rest of the team know what he's planning to do sometimes.

JDG and Bobby did what was expected of them.

Lipinski had a better game and wasn't protecting himself from impacts as he has in other recent games.

Frampton battled hard and broke about even with the remaining Essendon tall forwards. It mustn't have been an easy night for him but he was desperate and basically played his role.

Our problems gaining possession after kick outs wasn't really apparent last night as the Bombers were just that bad and Howe was taking more kick outs. I dont expect Melbourne will let us off that easy however.

Other things to consider.

McStay was obviously the decoy tall forward for the night and as such it didn't matter that much if he didn't score, however I thought even in that role in such a win, he didn't give us much. If it is a choice for the next match between McStay and McCreery, I would opt for McCreery every time.

Sidebottom and Pendles. Both a looking a little too slow and vulnerable when the pace is on the game. Pendles dropping a soda wasn't a good look and Sidebottom's contributions were ordinary. Pendles around the ground work was good mostly however. I fear they may both be found out somewhat in the faster pace in finals - unless they can go up a gear as required for finals footy. As neither of them will be dropped, we can only wait and see I think. Just for the record I am not in favour of either of them continuing next year, as the issues with their declining outputs will only be worse next year. We have dynamic young midfielders itching for a game and we can't keep them in the seconds forever - they need game time in the seniors to take their performance to the next level (if they can).

Oh and will the MRP look at the two dangerous tackles laid on Elliot and and Cameron last night? I thought the one on Cameron certainly affected his game as he was a bit quiet after that one and I thought Elliot was affected also before he came off injured. If the MRP is going to be consistent both of the Essendumb players need to be cited for those dangerous tackling efforts.

While it was a good win (and frankly I had underestimated just how bad the Bombers are travelling pre-match), Melbourne are going to be a few levels above them when it comes to pressure and ball use. We will need to be on form for the entire game to beat them. A one quarter burst is likely not going to get the job done.

All in all I'm happy and excited to see what the finals have in store for us.
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.�
User avatar
MatthewBoydFanClub
Posts: 5559
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Elwood
Been liked: 1 time

Post by MatthewBoydFanClub »

Pies2016 wrote:McStay will play because he offers more than what’s recorded on a stats table. He brings leadership, smarts and experience to a forward line that is limited in those areas. He’s a workhorse who makes life easier for Miochek.
He’s also averaging close to two goals a game since he came back, so they won’t be leaving those qualities and contributions out of the team.
I thought he had a poor night last night. Then I watched the replay this afternoon. There's so much that he does that you don't notice unless you're close to the field of play - knocks ons, blocks, tap ons, guarding space for the forwards. He's a totally team orientated player, who's not as flashy as say, Johnson, but who's always giving 100% to the team.
User avatar
Gerry Cooper
Posts: 888
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:49 am
Has liked: 212 times
Been liked: 47 times

Post by Gerry Cooper »

MatthewBoydFanClub wrote:
Pies2016 wrote:McStay will play because he offers more than what’s recorded on a stats table. He brings leadership, smarts and experience to a forward line that is limited in those areas. He’s a workhorse who makes life easier for Miochek.
He’s also averaging close to two goals a game since he came back, so they won’t be leaving those qualities and contributions out of the team.
I thought he had a poor night last night. Then I watched the replay this afternoon. There's so much that he does that you don't notice unless you're close to the field of play - knocks ons, blocks, tap ons, guarding space for the forwards. He's a totally team orientated player, who's not as flashy as say, Johnson, but who's always giving 100% to the team.
You are right and in that role he didn't do a lot wrong. It would be interesting to see how the club rated his game.
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.�
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20136
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 35 times

Post by What'sinaname »

woodys_world69 wrote:i like WHE as sub
gives us flexibility
WHE and Leggy need to start. They have the speed to help us transition. Fly has a monumental selection dilemma. I think Lipinski misses out. Also, one of Adams or Sidey miss out too if Ginni and Cox are in the starting 22.
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50689
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 84 times

Post by David »

"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
dmov73
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 8:10 pm

Post by dmov73 »

I’d rather McStay play over Cameron. He can play forward, back, and ruck. Plus, he is a good mark and very mobile. His left foot field kicking is very good. I like Cox and Cameron, but I’ve rarely seen either of them get back into a game they’ve been poor in, bar 2018 prelim. Just my opinion.
Sometimes the good you do does you no good. Tony Soprano.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20136
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 35 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Fighting against the objectification of woman.
User avatar
Leggie
Posts: 3022
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Perth
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Leggie »

Bring Back Tranquilli
Post Reply