Round 14 - Collingwood vs Frankston at Victoria Park

The home of conversation about our Reserves team - the second best men's team in the world!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

very cold today at vic park
really liked Marty's work rate and attack on the footy.
Pendlebury was as solid as a rock in defense.
Found the forward structure a bit hard to fathom - no one was left home most of the day. Ceglar needs to eat a christmas dinner every week and put on some weight.
Will be a very good footballer soon once he matures
Witts couldn't get into the game
I thought our effort was good all day.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
die4pies
Posts: 7956
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Trenerry Cres.
Contact:

Post by die4pies »

Frre kicks:
Collingwood 21
Frankston 35
"MAKE COLLINGWOOD GRATE AGAIN"
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 23 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

die4pies wrote:Frre kicks:
Collingwood 21
Frankston 35
That is Disgusting - Well the Umps must of been Glad that I was not there
I am Da Man
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 23 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

John Wren wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:Sounds like we did not play all that well
was an awful afternoon for football. rain came in at 45 degrees, icy cold sou'wester. we did well despite the conditions. it was no fun for anyone not undercover.
Glad I stayed home then as It would of been Freezing and then the Long Trip Home and Would of had to caught a Bus on the way home
I am Da Man
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Glad to hear that we won today.

Great response by Marty Clarke to stamp his authority on the game today and to show Bucks and the selectors that he deserves to be in our senior side. I can see him replacing Buckley this weekend against the Scum.

Pity that Taz didn't end up playing unfortunately. I wonder what's wrong with him now.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Fire Up
Posts: 14233
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: in a house

Post by Fire Up »

how was the electric scoreboard? :lol: :lol: :lol: :P
User avatar
die4pies
Posts: 7956
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Trenerry Cres.
Contact:

Post by die4pies »

Fire Up wrote:how was the electric scoreboard? :lol: :lol: :lol: :P
Waterlogged :D

We got it connected and I could ping it. Then I was told that they made a change to it so we could have a game time clock instead of a it just telling the time (which is useless) and this required an 'upgrade' to the laptop.

It is a load of typical local government BS. They should have spent the 50K refurbing the old scoreboard as they agreed to do from the outset the back stabbing bastards.
"MAKE COLLINGWOOD GRATE AGAIN"
User avatar
slydog81
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:16 am

Post by slydog81 »

marty clarke in..williams or buckley out.
We're always up to mischief!
User avatar
Fire Up
Posts: 14233
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: in a house

Post by Fire Up »

die4pies wrote:
Fire Up wrote:how was the electric scoreboard? :lol: :lol: :lol: :P
Waterlogged :D

We got it connected and I could ping it. Then I was told that they made a change to it so we could have a game time clock instead of a it just telling the time (which is useless) and this required an 'upgrade' to the laptop.

It is a load of typical local government BS. They should have spent the 50K refurbing the old scoreboard as they agreed to do from the outset the back stabbing bastards.
lol shane. i said it because "john wren" had to stand out in the rain and do it by hand. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

slydog81 wrote:marty clarke in..williams or buckley out.
and they'd both be stiff... Mooney might go back after being given a taster... Sinclair must be close to coming back as well
User avatar
die4pies
Posts: 7956
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Trenerry Cres.
Contact:

Post by die4pies »

Photos from the game:

VICTORIA PARK ON FACEBOOK

[align=center]Image

Image

Image[/align]
"MAKE COLLINGWOOD GRATE AGAIN"
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17243
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

die4pies wrote:Frre kicks:
Collingwood 21
Frankston 35
There is nothing in the rules that says the free's should be equal at the end of a match.
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17243
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

think better wrote:Thanks again MagpieBat

Ferraro keeps getting the ball and looks a likely type. Would he be a chance for a mature pick up in the draft?
They are taking Ferraro out of the contested ball and playing him forward line and he still does the job. Tough footballer from a tough footballing family.
User avatar
die4pies
Posts: 7956
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Trenerry Cres.
Contact:

Post by die4pies »

Culprit wrote:
die4pies wrote:Frre kicks:
Collingwood 21
Frankston 35
There is nothing in the rules that says the free's should be equal at the end of a match.
It was clearly one rule for Frankston and another for Collingwood.
The damage was done in the first quarter when Frankston had 10 free kicks to our nil. We were making all the play and everytime it killed our momentum. The game would have been over by quarter time if the umpires paid the clear freekicks our forwards should have got and did not pay the three head high frees to Frankston that were the result of the Frankston defenders ducking their head into the Ceglar, Witts or Wood tackles. Which they did often to milk free kicks during the game.

It was only umpire #9. He clearly had something against Collingwood.

I thought Frankston as club should why they are so pathetic too and the milking of freekicks and on field whinging was just a small part of that.

It didn't matter in the end.

EDIT - BTW. I got soaked to the bone and almost got frost bite in my hands to be as close to the action as I could and looking through a 500mm lens gives a pretty close very of the action. I know what I saw and I know what I heard and it was pathetic.
"MAKE COLLINGWOOD GRATE AGAIN"
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 23 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

die4pies wrote:
Culprit wrote:
die4pies wrote:Frre kicks:
Collingwood 21
Frankston 35
There is nothing in the rules that says the free's should be equal at the end of a match.
It was clearly one rule for Frankston and another for Collingwood.
The damage was done in the first quarter when Frankston had 10 free kicks to our nil. We were making all the play and everytime it killed our momentum. The game would have been over by quarter time if the umpires paid the clear freekicks our forwards should have got and did not pay the three head high frees to Frankston that were the result of the Frankston defenders ducking their head into the Ceglar, Witts or Wood tackles. Which they did often to milk free kicks during the game.

It was only umpire #9. He clearly had something against Collingwood.

I thought Frankston as club should why they are so pathetic too and the milking of freekicks and on field whinging was just a small part of that.

It didn't matter in the end.

EDIT - BTW. I got soaked to the bone and almost got frost bite in my hands to be as close to the action as I could and looking through a 500mm lens gives a pretty close very of the action. I know what I saw and I know what I heard and it was pathetic.
As I say in nearlly every game collingwood plays there seems to be 1 rule for us and another for the Other side :evil:
I am Da Man
Post Reply