Coronavirus 5 - Last Blood
Moderator: bbmods
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
You've made it clear that deaths are the only way you evaluate how Australia is dealing with COVID.Pies4shaw wrote:Just a little update on how Australia is dealing with Omicron.
Since December, the number of hospitalisations at its peak rose by 3,500 and the number on ventilation rose by 100. So yeah, 3,400 hospitalisations were treated with ibuprofen and cortisone. Thanks for reinforcing my point that Omicron hospitalisations aren't as bad as the Delta variant.Pies4shaw wrote:The thing that's actually disturbing is that you so plainly have never thought that the number of people dying in Australia from the "harmless virus" is disturbing.
Remember Pollyanna posting this in December 2021:
Ibuprofen sure looks to have done some damage, since, if it wasn't COVID.What'sinaname wrote:Thankfully scientists / epidemiologists have had their time in the sun and rational people are now making decisions.
All the latest news says Omicron symptoms are mild and hospitalisations are people with muscle ache and fever being teated with cortisone and ibuprofen not treated with oxygen.
2.2 million people recovered from COVID in that time. But once again, if all you do is look at deaths....Pies4shaw wrote: Remember this one, from 1 January 2022:
When you posted that, there had been 2,253 COVID deaths in Australia through the whole of the pandemic. Since then, there have been well over a further 2,500. Moreover, despite all of those deaths, the number of people in ICU is over 40% higher today than when you posted that.What'sinaname wrote:ICU patients have halved in the last week. While the doom and gloomers will try to tell you the end of the world is nigh, it's not.
The funny thing is that you never, ever come back in to say - "Oh, by the way, the rubbish I posted on [insert date] has turned out to be misleading drivel (again)". So, sadly, I have to take time mentioning the actual figures
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
Um...maybe because those people won’t see tomorrow, because that what makes this pandemic DEADly. Once it turns into an endemic, then you start counting all the long covid sufferers, those with lung conditions and other problems who will NEVER recover.
I actually get why the cuffs are coming off, it’s preparation for winter, it’s preparation for the overload, to try and stop it happening. Hopefully the unclean see that because they will be the most at risk.
Setting people free now is not happening because it’s safe to do so, it’s a controlled experiment. And I’ll be wearing my mask and being a bit cautious! I have a husband that goes to various warehouse sites anda daughter who’s a teacher, I’m sure it will come to me in time, but I’m not in a hurry for it!
I actually get why the cuffs are coming off, it’s preparation for winter, it’s preparation for the overload, to try and stop it happening. Hopefully the unclean see that because they will be the most at risk.
Setting people free now is not happening because it’s safe to do so, it’s a controlled experiment. And I’ll be wearing my mask and being a bit cautious! I have a husband that goes to various warehouse sites anda daughter who’s a teacher, I’m sure it will come to me in time, but I’m not in a hurry for it!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54848
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 168 times
I agree with all that, except I'd probably say educated gamble rather than controlled experiment.
Relying on a combination of a less virulent virus, high vaccination levels and people being outdoors in summer, they had modelling predicting worst case scenarios of hospitalisations and deaths and when the actual numbers fell well short they have been able to wind back more restrictions.
As you say though, I fully expect some form of heightened restrictions come winter. I also expect to get a second booster.
Just for comparison with the numbers:
Up to 31/12/2021 (22 months) Australia had 395k recorded cases and 2239 deaths.
Since then, in less than 2 months, we've had 2.6 Million recorded cases (real number likely more than double) for 2700 deaths.
That is a lot of dead people but, in the eyes of the governments it seems, not an unacceptable price to pay for a largely open society and the benefits of having large segments of the population with boosted immunity from natural infection.
Relying on a combination of a less virulent virus, high vaccination levels and people being outdoors in summer, they had modelling predicting worst case scenarios of hospitalisations and deaths and when the actual numbers fell well short they have been able to wind back more restrictions.
As you say though, I fully expect some form of heightened restrictions come winter. I also expect to get a second booster.
Just for comparison with the numbers:
Up to 31/12/2021 (22 months) Australia had 395k recorded cases and 2239 deaths.
Since then, in less than 2 months, we've had 2.6 Million recorded cases (real number likely more than double) for 2700 deaths.
That is a lot of dead people but, in the eyes of the governments it seems, not an unacceptable price to pay for a largely open society and the benefits of having large segments of the population with boosted immunity from natural infection.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
^^^ Those projections were dodgy, weren't they? Or else they were never disclosing what they really expected. It's hard to know because, so far as I could identify, the NSW Government under Perottet modeled both hospitalisations and deaths but only released the information about hospitalisation modelling publcly.
The original stain of COVID, in a wholly-unvaccinated population, had an infection mortality rate of about 1 in 400. If everyone in Australia had got it, at once, without any medical protections, it would have been reasonable to expect no more than about 65,000 deaths in the entire population.
If Omicron had been as deadly as the original COVID strains, we might have expected no more than 6,500 deaths from 2.6 Million entirely unvaccinated cases. Since Omicron was allegedly "less dangerous" and 95% of Australians (and nearly all of those in the higher risk groups) were vaccinated and hence only 10% as likely to have serious illness, that should have translated into well under 1,000 deaths by the start of 2022.
Indeed, in June 2021, the Doherty Institute model, used by the Commonwealth Government to develop its "pathway out of the pandemic", predicted that opening up at 80% fully-vaccinated (ie, then "double dosed") would mean that we could expect 750 deaths Australia-wide. Somehow, we're beyond 4 times that (without, of course, seeing any consequences in WA because there has been no opening up there) - yet, with a supposedly "less dangerous" version of the virus.
This looks like an application of the old public service trick of starting with a stupidly bad scenario, then claiming "victory" when things didn't go as well as they should have - but didn't go as bad as the "worst case".
The original stain of COVID, in a wholly-unvaccinated population, had an infection mortality rate of about 1 in 400. If everyone in Australia had got it, at once, without any medical protections, it would have been reasonable to expect no more than about 65,000 deaths in the entire population.
If Omicron had been as deadly as the original COVID strains, we might have expected no more than 6,500 deaths from 2.6 Million entirely unvaccinated cases. Since Omicron was allegedly "less dangerous" and 95% of Australians (and nearly all of those in the higher risk groups) were vaccinated and hence only 10% as likely to have serious illness, that should have translated into well under 1,000 deaths by the start of 2022.
Indeed, in June 2021, the Doherty Institute model, used by the Commonwealth Government to develop its "pathway out of the pandemic", predicted that opening up at 80% fully-vaccinated (ie, then "double dosed") would mean that we could expect 750 deaths Australia-wide. Somehow, we're beyond 4 times that (without, of course, seeing any consequences in WA because there has been no opening up there) - yet, with a supposedly "less dangerous" version of the virus.
This looks like an application of the old public service trick of starting with a stupidly bad scenario, then claiming "victory" when things didn't go as well as they should have - but didn't go as bad as the "worst case".
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54848
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Obviously I haven't seen the modelling either so I can only draw assumptions based on every state except WA basically following the same roadmap.
Either the number of deaths has been within acceptable tolerances or they are way higher but the horse had bolted so it's cross fingers and hope they follow hospitalisations and go down, which they are. If it was the second case however, why would they be reducing restrictions?
The other factor is it's only 2.5 Million reported cases. With all the changes to testing requirements the real number of cases is likely to be an order of magnitude higher. Millions of people who weren't required to get tested and had zero or little symptoms never got tested.
We may get an indication of which it was come winter. If the deaths have been higher than expected we will likely looking at more restrictions early as a preventative.
Either the number of deaths has been within acceptable tolerances or they are way higher but the horse had bolted so it's cross fingers and hope they follow hospitalisations and go down, which they are. If it was the second case however, why would they be reducing restrictions?
The other factor is it's only 2.5 Million reported cases. With all the changes to testing requirements the real number of cases is likely to be an order of magnitude higher. Millions of people who weren't required to get tested and had zero or little symptoms never got tested.
We may get an indication of which it was come winter. If the deaths have been higher than expected we will likely looking at more restrictions early as a preventative.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54848
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Yes, but that was based on Delta. We didn't have Omicron in June 2021.
Data at the time showed that Vaccination provided a high level of protection against catching Delta so assumed that case numbers would not explode.
Vaccines proved to be almost useless against protecting from infection from
Omicron although they did/do provide very good protection against serious illness. Omicron was able to spread like wildfire because fully vaccinated people were able to catch it and pass it on to both vaccinated and unvaccinated often without even knowing they'd had it.
So modelling based on Delta doesn't apply to Omicron.
NSW at least released some case and hospitalisation modelling for Omicron, I don't believe Victoria has released anything.
Data at the time showed that Vaccination provided a high level of protection against catching Delta so assumed that case numbers would not explode.
Vaccines proved to be almost useless against protecting from infection from
Omicron although they did/do provide very good protection against serious illness. Omicron was able to spread like wildfire because fully vaccinated people were able to catch it and pass it on to both vaccinated and unvaccinated often without even knowing they'd had it.
So modelling based on Delta doesn't apply to Omicron.
NSW at least released some case and hospitalisation modelling for Omicron, I don't believe Victoria has released anything.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12396
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
- eddiesmith
- Posts: 12396
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
he, wont be necessary to lockdown, it will happen anyway! juniors school has so many kids and teachers that are infected they are talking about shutting the school!eddiesmith wrote:So have the doomsayers said what they'd be doing differently? Do you want schools closed? Never ending lockdowns? Masks outdoors? Or just want to complain about people enjoying life but not actually calling for a return to lockdown so nothing would change in your ideal world?
as for the rest, codswallop!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
A brief update on government responses.
WA opening up from 3 March 2022:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-18/ ... /100843126
Victorian mask rules further eased from the end of the week: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-22/ ... /100850046
Summary from the ABC blog:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... on-1-april
WA opening up from 3 March 2022:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-18/ ... /100843126
Victorian mask rules further eased from the end of the week: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-22/ ... /100850046
Summary from the ABC blog:
England (not the UK) has announced an end to most COVID legal rules (the weekly average of deaths there is still over 1,000): https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... in-englandVictoria will ease its mask rules from 11:59pm this Friday, with masks no longer needed in most indoor settings.
Masks will still be required in a number of settings, including...
People on public transport, in taxis and rideshare, on planes, and indoors at an airport
People working or visiting hospitals, and indoor areas at care facilities
Workers in hospitality, retail and the court system
Workers at justice and correctional facilities
Students in year 3 or above at primary school, and workers at early childhood centres and primary schools (masks can be removed in secondary school)
People working indoors at an event with more than 30,000 people attending
In special circumstances, such as if you have COVID-19 or are a close contact and you're leaving home
The public health recommendation for Victorians to study or work from home will also be removed.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... on-1-april