More states legalize Pot 8) when for Oz?
Moderator: bbmods
- think positive
- Posts: 40235
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 335 times
- Been liked: 102 times
Use of higher purity ecstasy on the rise among young Australians
https://www.theage.com.au/national/use- ... 5087s.html
https://www.theage.com.au/national/use- ... 5087s.html
- Jezza
- Posts: 29460
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 249 times
- Been liked: 336 times
Canada becomes the second country after Uruguay to legalise recreational marijuana.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45806255
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45806255
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Culprit
- Posts: 17234
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Port Melbourne
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 68 times
http://vt.co/news/weird/canada-is-appar ... paign=post
Canada is apparently almost entirely out of weed just two days after legalisation
Canada is apparently almost entirely out of weed just two days after legalisation
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54817
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 122 times
- Been liked: 158 times
Fairfax's article on Mumford, with video:
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl ... 50bcp.html
The article's statement that
"The club is satisfied that Mumford, who is now married with two children, does not have a drug problem."
seems a bit odd compared with GWS's quoted statement that
"The club ... understands that Shane requires a level of medical support with his health and well-being in mind...
"The club will be working with Shane to ensure he engages in a rehabilitation program along with a range of other measures."
I wonder what the "employment law ramifications" the article mentions are.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl ... 50bcp.html
The article's statement that
"The club is satisfied that Mumford, who is now married with two children, does not have a drug problem."
seems a bit odd compared with GWS's quoted statement that
"The club ... understands that Shane requires a level of medical support with his health and well-being in mind...
"The club will be working with Shane to ensure he engages in a rehabilitation program along with a range of other measures."
I wonder what the "employment law ramifications" the article mentions are.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54817
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 122 times
- Been liked: 158 times
Did you read the article?K wrote:Fairfax's article on Mumford, with video:
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl ... 50bcp.html
The article's statement that
"The club is satisfied that Mumford, who is now married with two children, does not have a drug problem."
seems a bit odd compared with GWS's quoted statement that
"The club ... understands that Shane requires a level of medical support with his health and well-being in mind...
"The club will be working with Shane to ensure he engages in a rehabilitation program along with a range of other measures."
I wonder what the "employment law ramifications" the article mentions are.
Given that it allegedly happened over 3 years ago, when he wasn't playing due to injury, I highly doubt he'll suffer any sanctionsAs a ruck coach and club ambassador, Mumford could be sanctioned by the AFL as a club employee, such as under a charge of "conduct unbecoming''.
Mumford is contracted to be employed (as a coach) at GWS for next year. He cannot be handed a "strike'' under the AFL's illicit drugs code as an official but can be subjected to penalties by the AFL, including a suspension.
GWS, too, can obviously take separate action against Mumford as an employee, depending on the legal position.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.