George Floyd Police killing and protests
Moderator: bbmods
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
- Morrigu
- Posts: 6001
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2001 6:01 pm
So just out of curiosity the investigation is not complete yet but the DA has laid charges and decided the officer is guilty - no trial for him then just guilty?Pies4shaw wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jun/17/rayshard-brooks-charges-atlanta-police-officer-garrett-rolfe
“The Atlanta officer who fatally shot Rayshard Brooks in the back after the fleeing man pointed a stun gun in his direction faces 11 charges, including felony murder, a prosecutor said Wednesday.
Prosecutors said Brooks, who was black, posed no threat when he was gunned down and that the white officer kicked him and offered no medical treatment as he lay dying on the ground.
Brooks was holding a stun gun he had snatched from officers but was 18ft, 3in away when he was shot by Officer Garrett Rolfe and was running away at the time, District Attorney Paul Howard said in announcing the charges five days after the killing outside a Wendy’s restaurant rocked the city.
....
In announcing the charges Brooks [sic] revealed disturbing details about the incident. Howard revealed that Rolfe knew the taser Brooks took from him was not functional as it had already been fired twice and thus was of no use when he shot Brooks twice in the back as he was running away.
The detail underscores that Rolfe was aware he was in no physical danger when he fatally shot Brooks. Cameras also captured Rolfe kicking Brooks as he was on the ground struggling for his life.”
“Mr. Brooks was calm, cordial and cooperative,” Howard said at a news conference Wednesday during which he went over the video evidence. “His demeanor was almost jovial.”The interaction with two police officers went on for 41 minutes and 17 seconds, during which “Mr. Brooks never presented himself as a threat,” Seriously - is this bloke actually blind?
And no medical treatment eh - forgot to mention the CPR administered by officers as shown on the body cam footage???
At least Brooks resisting arrest and trying to run makes sense - when you have been let out of jail on probation ( for amongst other things bashing your GF and your kids) because of COVID-19 and then you are found drunk whilst driving (again) you’d probably do whatever needed to avoid going back to jail I suppose!
“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”
- David
- Posts: 50690
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 84 times
Last edited by David on Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
- David
- Posts: 50690
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 84 times
It is. It's also irrelevant, as I pointed out in my post above. You're dealing with maybe at most a 1% chance (black) as opposed to something like a 0.2% chance (white). So you shouldn't be presuming anyone's a potential murderer based on how they look.
Last edited by David on Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
your saying potential murderer like every criminal is a murderer. try more likely to commit a crime, and you might get a much different result. Im not saying they are criminals because they are black, its a lot more complex than that. its the demographics of wealth distribution, have a look out the figures for poverty. have a look at the gang figures, what percentage of gang members are black?David wrote:It is. It's also irrelevant, as I pointed out in my post above. You're dealing with maybe at most a 1% chance (black) as opposed to something like a 0.2% chance (white). So you shouldn't be presuming anyone's a potential murderer based on how they look.
and by the way 1 percent is 5 times .2 percent, your figures!!!
what i really hate about all this is the forgotten everyday people. what ever colour they are, it shouldnt make a difference, and there are plenty of communities in the States where it doesnt.
i really do believe the presence of guns in the community is making the situation a whole lot worse.
interestingly mass shootings are more commonly carried out by white males.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
spot on, great postMorrigu wrote:So just out of curiosity the investigation is not complete yet but the DA has laid charges and decided the officer is guilty - no trial for him then just guilty?Pies4shaw wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jun/17/rayshard-brooks-charges-atlanta-police-officer-garrett-rolfe
“The Atlanta officer who fatally shot Rayshard Brooks in the back after the fleeing man pointed a stun gun in his direction faces 11 charges, including felony murder, a prosecutor said Wednesday.
Prosecutors said Brooks, who was black, posed no threat when he was gunned down and that the white officer kicked him and offered no medical treatment as he lay dying on the ground.
Brooks was holding a stun gun he had snatched from officers but was 18ft, 3in away when he was shot by Officer Garrett Rolfe and was running away at the time, District Attorney Paul Howard said in announcing the charges five days after the killing outside a Wendy’s restaurant rocked the city.
....
In announcing the charges Brooks [sic] revealed disturbing details about the incident. Howard revealed that Rolfe knew the taser Brooks took from him was not functional as it had already been fired twice and thus was of no use when he shot Brooks twice in the back as he was running away.
The detail underscores that Rolfe was aware he was in no physical danger when he fatally shot Brooks. Cameras also captured Rolfe kicking Brooks as he was on the ground struggling for his life.”
“Mr. Brooks was calm, cordial and cooperative,” Howard said at a news conference Wednesday during which he went over the video evidence. “His demeanor was almost jovial.”The interaction with two police officers went on for 41 minutes and 17 seconds, during which “Mr. Brooks never presented himself as a threat,” Seriously - is this bloke actually blind?
And no medical treatment eh - forgot to mention the CPR administered by officers as shown on the body cam footage???
At least Brooks resisting arrest and trying to run makes sense - when you have been let out of jail on probation ( for amongst other things bashing your GF and your kids) because of COVID-19 and then you are found drunk whilst driving (again) you’d probably do whatever needed to avoid going back to jail I suppose!
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- David
- Posts: 50690
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 84 times
Wokko was the one specifically talking about homicide, as a way of justifying police """wariness""". Obviously if we talk about all violent crime or all crime as a whole, we'll get different results.think positive wrote:your saying potential murderer like every criminal is a murderer. try more likely to commit a crime, and you might get a much different result.David wrote:It is. It's also irrelevant, as I pointed out in my post above. You're dealing with maybe at most a 1% chance (black) as opposed to something like a 0.2% chance (white). So you shouldn't be presuming anyone's a potential murderer based on how they look.
Last edited by David on Thu Jun 18, 2020 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
Thankfully you don't work in virology David. Just because a percentage is small, doesn't make it irrelevant.David wrote:It is. It's also irrelevant, as I pointed out in my post above. You're dealing with maybe at most a 1% chance (black) as opposed to something like a 0.2% chance (white). So you shouldn't be presuming anyone's a potential murderer based on how they look.
- David
- Posts: 50690
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 84 times
Murder is not a virus lol. That's a ridiculous analogy.
In case anyone's struggling to follow, we're talking about whether it's reasonable to act differently around a black suspect differently than a white suspect because of differences in small percentages of potential lethality. I actually hope that most of us here are already firmly on board with the belief that police should not be doing that.
In case anyone's struggling to follow, we're talking about whether it's reasonable to act differently around a black suspect differently than a white suspect because of differences in small percentages of potential lethality. I actually hope that most of us here are already firmly on board with the belief that police should not be doing that.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange