Page 14 of 15

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 8:05 am
by neil
When listing players as tradable remember they have to agree to the trade.
We tried to swap Witts he refused and next year left and we got nothing for him. Lesson using a player as trade bait can blow up in your face

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 8:14 am
by dalyc
neil wrote:When listing players as tradable remember they have to agree to the trade.
We tried to swap Witts he refused and next year left and we got nothing for him. Lesson using a player as trade bait can blow up in your face
We got 44 and 62 for him. 44 we used on Callum Brown. 62 ni.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:02 pm
by neil
dalyc wrote:
neil wrote:When listing players as tradable remember they have to agree to the trade.
We tried to swap Witts he refused and next year left and we got nothing for him. Lesson using a player as trade bait can blow up in your face
We got 44 and 62 for him. 44 we used on Callum Brown. 62 ni.
Brown was F/S we would have used the next pick we had as per the rules

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:04 pm
by MightyMagpie
BREAKING: Jake Lever requests a trade away from Adelaide_FC to a "Victorian Club".

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:12 pm
by burnsy17

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:32 pm
by WarrenerraW
let melscum pay through the roof for him. we're better off using our pick 6 on the best young talent available in the draft. lever would cost us pick 6 and next years first rounder - essentially leaving us with nothing but him. the 2018 draft is supposed to be good so let's hold out for that rather than throw everything at lever. keep in mind we only just parted with 2 first rounders from consecutive years on treloar so I'd like us to be a bit smarter this time round.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:33 pm
by Ev5Magpies
On trade radio, Barrett commented that Lever will be nominating Melbourne as his club later today/tomorrow

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:36 pm
by BazBoy
Jake has said the "out" word with Dee's & Pie's talked of as the main suitors

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:38 pm
by BazBoy
Did not see Barrett's comment that he will nominate for Dee's

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:39 pm
by GreekLunatic
He ain't worth 850 k he can go to Melbourne

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:21 pm
by dalyc
neil wrote:
dalyc wrote:
neil wrote:When listing players as tradable remember they have to agree to the trade.
We tried to swap Witts he refused and next year left and we got nothing for him. Lesson using a player as trade bait can blow up in your face
We got 44 and 62 for him. 44 we used on Callum Brown. 62 ni.
Brown was F/S we would have used the next pick we had as per the rules
Which was 44

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:56 pm
by MightyMagpie
dalyc wrote:
neil wrote:
dalyc wrote: We got 44 and 62 for him. 44 we used on Callum Brown. 62 ni.
Brown was F/S we would have used the next pick we had as per the rules
Which was 44
I think his point was if we didn't have 44 and 62 in which case points would come off the next pick with DV points (up to pick 73).

However, if points from current year picks after the bid are insufficient then the deduction carries over to picks from the following year starting with the first pick from the round where the player was bid, so we did get some value for Witts.

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 9:01 pm
by Pies4shaw
He seems to have told BT on Ch 7 that he wants to go to Melbourne. Just saw an advertising snippet to that effect, now.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 12:03 pm
by Piesnchess
Lever will go to the Deeeees, and we likely could get Watts. Happy ?

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 12:06 pm
by E
Piesnchess wrote:Lever will go to the Deeeees, and we likely could get Watts. Happy ?
i thought watts was going to Sydney.