Page 13 of 15
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:59 am
by KenH
Dave The Man wrote:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/former-essendon-coach-james-hird-breaks-silence-on-bombers-drugs-saga/news-story/8ce79063afbb812be12e750342a4d074
Does anyone Believe that Bullshit?
Can't read this!
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:58 am
by think positive
partypie wrote:Just wondering if they get tested for peds and illegal substances while under suspension
yes
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:31 pm
by piedys
Funkadelic wrote:dyso you are correct my friend, i assumed we played them twice as we always seem to.
... and ill keep the gags to a family friendly level, stuff like 'things have gone from bad to worsfold' ' i thought Thymosin beta-4 was a star wars character', y'know, nothing too silly.
Bwahahahahaha!!! G-rated gags can have us in stitches too!
Dyso
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:34 pm
by David
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:16 pm
by Dave The Man
Lawyers are the biggest winners out of this
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:59 am
by think positive
He should get his fine money back
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:02 am
by think positive
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:47 am
by OEP
Finally the correct outcome of this whole sordid mess. Now I can watch footy again.
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:31 am
by David
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:17 pm
by think positive
Yeah actually it does, it makes them guilty
Of stupidity, of blind faith, of taking illegal supplements
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:57 pm
by David
Not sure you're reading what I'm saying. Perhaps the thing I just posted on Facebook makes my argument clearer - either way, I think simply repeating that they're 'guilty' isn't really engaging with my argument, which is that the issue of guilt in this case is at the very least complex.
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:07 pm
by stoliboy
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:07 pm
by i hate carlton
All the players are in denial.
As is Hird.
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:35 pm
by think positive
David wrote:Not sure you're reading what I'm saying. Perhaps the thing I just posted on Facebook makes my argument clearer - either way, I think simply repeating that they're 'guilty' isn't really engaging with my argument, which is that the issue of guilt in this case is at the very least complex.
Stolen but apt
The Players maybe did not join the dots, but the implications of their situation was obvious to anyone capable of looking at the information objectively.
Ask the players.
How many injections did you receive? (lots)
What was the intent of these injections? (to improve infield performance)
How isn't this drug doping and outright cheating?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:26 pm
by David
^ You know what's discomforting about that formula? It's well known that our club, and every other AFL club as far as we know, gives its players injections and supplements too. What purpose do they serve other than to improve performance? Essendon just took it to the next level.
I wish it wasn't the case, but that seems to be how things are in the AFL nowadays.
