This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.
Nice win by north was unexpected but well done the other games today I feel gws will be too good for suns and swans to have an upset win over the cats swans have a good record in Geelong too other games lions over the hawks crows over dees saints to win blues in an upset win and the dogs just over the eagles dogs have a good record at Perth against eagles too
Iโll like both gws and west coast to loss this round as itโll give the pies even more breathing space up the top of the ladder a cats loss will help us too will make us equal first
They're probably not, really. They are a dreadful second half team, which was why I was always confident we were going to beat them last week, even when they got in front.
A tackle worth 4 points makes me go mildly .
But the real question is why the AFL deliberately makes it this simplistic, when they have much more sophisticated systems.
It feels like the AFL is deliberately trying to dumb down the fans.
I submit them purely because many punters like them.
Ruckmen get a cheap 47 points for '47 hitouts', no matter where the ball goes. How many times do we see a ruckman get first hand on the ball and either misdirect it or it gets sharked ?
And what constitutes a tackle ? Getting a free from it or just grabbing another player who can still dispose of the ball ? Big difference.
Last edited by Donny on Sat Jun 01, 2019 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.