Page 2 of 6
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 9:03 am
by Dark Beanie
Hird and Dank have got a lot to answer for.
So, are we finally going to hear their side of the story ??
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 9:23 am
by ANNODAM
This makes me very happy, thank you WADA!!!
Coming off the top ropes heavy on ESS is music to my ears.
Now if only Jibber Jabber would hand his Brownlow back...
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 9:36 am
by robevpau1
New evidence can be tendered in a CAS hearing. Also the standard of proof is determined upon "comfortable satisfaction", rather than the current finding of 'not comfortable satisfied by the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal.
Seems 'comfortability' will be the lynch-pin!
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 9:38 am
by HAL
How recently? Are we still talking about hoping for a suspended sentence so we can see him sooner rather than in the black and white?
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 9:59 am
by BHPIE
Like others , all I hope for is for Hird to get his arse kicked , ..being suspended with pay n going to france to study was a joke,... hes the one responsible n should be banned
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:01 am
by Lazza
BHPIE, couldn't agree more. However I need more convincing that justice will finally be done after so many let downs.
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:03 am
by John Wren
lol at essendon finding the appeal as a shock. little said they didn't do much "what if" modelling on this scenario. that is either naive or poor judgement.
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:06 am
by Deja Vu
#standdownhird
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:08 am
by thompsoc
It is a desperate gamble to try and stick mud on Essendon.
There is no evidence what so ever that they cheated.
They cannot make Danks and Co. give evidence.
It is about them WADA not looking pathetic and for
them to shore up their authority about anti doping.
WADA is protecting themselves and not the integrity of sport.
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:15 am
by Lazza
I think just a very simple question definitely NEEDS to be answered honestly by Essendon thompsoc to let this matter rest.
WHAT exactly was in the injections given to the Essendon players in 2012?
Answer....................................................................
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:23 am
by thompsoc
Lazza wrote:I think just a very simple question definitely NEEDS to be answered honestly by Essendon thompsoc to let this matter rest.
WHAT exactly was in the injections given to the Essendon players in 2012?
Answer....................................................................
Only Danks knows and he isn't going to dob himself in.
So we have a legal system that says - innocent until
proven guilty.
Uphold this principle.
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:33 am
by jackcass
That's made my day that has!
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:33 am
by droversdog65
thompsoc wrote:Lazza wrote:I think just a very simple question definitely NEEDS to be answered honestly by Essendon thompsoc to let this matter rest.
WHAT exactly was in the injections given to the Essendon players in 2012?
Answer....................................................................
Only Danks knows and he isn't going to dob himself in.
So we have a legal system that says - innocent until
proven guilty.
Uphold this principle.
Thommo I don't know how many times I've had to repeat this because peeps can't seem to get it into their heads . . .
One more time I guess . . . .
The WADA appeal to the World sporting court is NOT dependent upon proving absolute proof of guilt . . . REPEAT . . . NOT dependent upon absolute proof of guilt.
The world court operates on the burden of proof being upon the charged party - NOT the accuser. This closely follows the model of the French legal system where you are guilty until you prove yourself innocent.
If the accused cannot prove themselves innocent they are gone.
There is no wriggle room or grey area and I can't for the life of me see where anyone cannot grasp these facts.
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:35 am
by Dave The Man
Glad WADA is Appealing against the Corrupt AFL
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 10:41 am
by John Wren
Dave The Man wrote:Glad WADA is Appealing against the Corrupt AFL
dave, if the afl is corrupt why do you still support it?