Page 10 of 19

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:41 pm
by ANNODAM
This is rigged, if a team can get up & win it from 7th, what's the point in finishing top 4 then, there's absolutely no advantage!

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:43 pm
by Pies4shaw
I'd love to see Collingwood get 12 free kicks to 4 in a half of football won by the other team. Hands up all those who think that will ever happen?

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:44 pm
by Jezza
Pies4shaw wrote:I'd love to see Collingwoid get 12 kicks to 4 in a half of football won by the other team. Hands up all those who think that will ever happen?
Image

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:44 pm
by mooretreloar
Dogs had a lot go right that half, things seemed to fall their way in general play but still 2 points down.
Buddy injured early, playing on 1 leg.
Also, 12 free kicks to them 4 to the Swans for the half.
Any 50/50 call went their way. Grundy mark not paid early in 2nd quarter, led to a goal. Mark paid to Johannisen, when Hanneberry was in front.
Free kick against Jack for high, could easily argue should have been below the knees, then a 50 was paid. Goal from the resulting inside 50.
Obviously evenly poised, but think the Swans have the potential for things to run their way in the 2nd half.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:45 pm
by Deja Vu
Almost every other stat for the game is 50/50.

Free kicks are 12 - 4.

Playing favourites much?

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:45 pm
by thompsoc
Pies4shaw wrote:I'd love to see Collingwood get 12 free kicks to 4 in a half of football won by the other team. Hands up all those who think that will ever happen?
I like the way the umps have let the play keep going.
No soft frees except for that last one

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:46 pm
by mooretreloar
Pies4shaw wrote:I hope Mitchell makes it to Carlton. He has been absolutely hopeless.
Unsure what game you are watching. 16 disposals, 14 in the 2nd quarter. 2 goals. 5 tackles.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:47 pm
by sixpoints
ANNODAM wrote:This is rigged, if a team can get up & win it from 7th, what's the point in finishing top 4 then, there's absolutely no advantage!
Nothing's rigged mate.
If the Bulldogs win 4 finals in a row then they'll deserve it. If you beat WC in Perth, Haw, GWS in Sydney &. then win again in the GF ...what more is needed.
Plus forget the finishing 7th, they won 15 games, that's only 2 less than Sydney. Not a massive difference after 22 matches.
I reckon Sydney are better.... but not a helluva lot better!

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:50 pm
by Pies4shaw
mooretreloar wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:I hope Mitchell makes it to Carlton. He has been absolutely hopeless.
Unsure what game you are watching. 16 disposals, 14 in the 2nd quarter. 2 goals. 5 tackles.
I'd respectfully invite you to review what he did with the first dozen - he was very much the weak link in Sydney's chain and cost goal after goal with poor disposal and bad tackling. His last goal was very good.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:53 pm
by ANNODAM
sixpoints wrote:
ANNODAM wrote:This is rigged, if a team can get up & win it from 7th, what's the point in finishing top 4 then, there's absolutely no advantage!
Nothing's rigged mate.
If the Bulldogs win 4 finals in a row then they'll deserve it. If you beat WC in Perth, Haw, GWS in Sydney &. then win again in the GF ...what more is needed.
Plus forget the finishing 7th, they won 15 games, that's only 2 less than Sydney. Not a massive difference after 22 matches.
I reckon Sydney are better.... but not a helluva lot better!




If that week off after the H&A season didn't favour the Bullflogs, then I'm a monkeys uncle!

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:54 pm
by Presti35
We have non AFL listed players running in the GF sprint this year.

And wholy gee wizz, one of them has won it.

Better make a new forum Nicks Other Non-AFL Football so we can discuss it.

#makenicksbetter

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:56 pm
by thompsoc
Yes that was weird.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:56 pm
by piedys
ANNODAM wrote:I just snuck across the street where my parents neighbours have decorated their house in red white & blue balloons.
I popped all the blue ones.
If you go around the corner, there are some kids eating ice creams in the park. They are sitting ducks if you'd like a nice choc-top...

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:59 pm
by What'sinaname
ANNODAM wrote:
sixpoints wrote:
ANNODAM wrote:This is rigged, if a team can get up & win it from 7th, what's the point in finishing top 4 then, there's absolutely no advantage!
Nothing's rigged mate.
If the Bulldogs win 4 finals in a row then they'll deserve it. If you beat WC in Perth, Haw, GWS in Sydney &. then win again in the GF ...what more is needed.
Plus forget the finishing 7th, they won 15 games, that's only 2 less than Sydney. Not a massive difference after 22 matches.
I reckon Sydney are better.... but not a helluva lot better!




If that week off after the H&A season didn't favour the Bullflogs, then I'm a monkeys uncle!
Doesn't matter. They played to the same rules as every other team.

We won 4 in a row with a bullshit challenge rule. It's stupid now, but it was the rule that applied.

Bulldogs are playing the same system the other 7 finalists are playing.

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:00 pm
by What'sinaname
Presti35 wrote:We have non AFL listed players running in the GF sprint this year.

And wholy gee wizz, one of them has won it.

Better make a new forum Nicks Other Non-AFL Football so we can discuss it.

#makenicksbetter
seriously, who cares about this sprint which is just an advert for 13 CABS