2018 World Cup

Keep up to date with all the latest news and results in the Premier and A-League.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Sweden 1, Suisserland 0.

England 1, Colombia 1 and 4:3 on penalties after extra time.

In the round of 16, three games went to extra time and each of those went to penalties - one starts to wonder if there's any poiint to playing the extra 30 minutes or whether it would be better to go straight to penalties. Looking at England at the end of 120 minutes, it's hard to see them running out the game in their quarter final after that extra work today.

Quarter final results will be:

If Cavani is fit, Uruguay 4, France 1. If Cavani isn't fit, Uruguay 0, France 0 and France through 4:1 on penalties.

Brazil 2, Belgium 0. Belgium are great up front but they look too plodding at the back to cope with Brazil on an average day. Belgium are the best team at the tournament going forward with the ball, so it would be great to see them win but, realistically, who's going to catch Neymar and Coutinho?

Sweden 1, England 0. Kane to miss 3 penalties on the way - just to remind us of what makes England so compelling in international championship games.

Croatia 5, Russia 0. Really, how did Russia get this far? Ok, ok - by knocking out Spain. Once, it's funny, twice and it's a lop=sided semi-final.

Now that the picture is emerging, there is clearly a harder road to the Final and an easier road.
K
Posts: 21557
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:23 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 32 times

Post by K »

Pies4shaw wrote:...
In the round of 16, three games went to extra time and each of those went to penalties - one starts to wonder if there's any poiint to playing the extra 30 minutes or whether it would be better to go straight to penalties. ...
I'm keen to make penalty shootouts the absolute last option. I preferred it when they had the golden-goal period added on after extra time, though everyone apparently hated that more than shootouts. They can hardly complain about bad fortune in the shootout if they did not at least try to win the game in extra time.

The option they've never tried although the idea has long been raised is taking players off. e.g. instead of the golden-goal period, have a period with 9 a side. Heck make it 8 if you want.
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by roar »

I also liked the golden goal and don't know why they abandoned it.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Oliver Bierhoff's golden goal in the 1996 European Championship comes to mind. I think FIFA probably liked the idea of finding a version of soccer that the Germans couldn't win.
User avatar
thesoretoothsayer
Posts: 1109
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:15 am
Been liked: 23 times

Post by thesoretoothsayer »

Good article about something that I'm glad seldom occurs in the AFL:

https://www.news.com.au/sport/football/ ... 298cb3f840
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Sweden 1-0 Switzerland

Image

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/44610243
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=012FkPcI1uE

Goals:
Sweden - 66' (Forsberg)

Colombia 1-1 England
England wins 4-3 on penalties

Image

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/44610244
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbmaLT320hw

Goals:
England - 57' (Kane) - Penalty
Colombia - 90' (Mina)

Quarter Finals:
- Uruguay v France
- Brazil v Belgium
- Russia v Croatia
- Sweden v England
Last edited by Jezza on Thu Jul 18, 2024 12:20 am, edited 2 times in total.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Tonight's Matches:

Image Image
Uruguay v France - 12am EST

Image Image
Brazil v Belgium - 4am EST
Last edited by Jezza on Thu Jul 18, 2024 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

No Cavani, no Uruguay. No Socrates, no Brazil.

Uruguay and Belgium go home and we have Neymar neymore.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Uruguay 0-2 France

Image

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/44652179
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YK4o-Gbppg

Goals:
France - 40' (Varane)
France - 61' (Griezmann)

Brazil 1-2 Belgium

Image

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/44652178
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8IK0ZqfxNI

Goals:
Belgium - 13' (Fernandinho) - Own Goal
Belgium - 31' (De Bruyne)
Brazil - 76' (Renato Augusto)
Last edited by Jezza on Thu Jul 18, 2024 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Tonight's Matches:

Image Image
Sweden v England - 12am EST

Image Image
Russia v Croatia - 4am EST
Last edited by Jezza on Thu Jul 18, 2024 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by roar »

French looking the business and Belgium did us all a favour. The semi between them promises to be a cracker.

Hoping England and Croatia win tonight to make it another cracker for the other semi.
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

This might prove to be a World Cup in which no competent team makes the Final.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

The only time I really watch soccer is during the world cup and while I enjoy it the softness and staging of the prima donna players reminds me of why it'll never have more than a passing appeal to me and many other Australians who love their AFL or NRL.

While watching some of the Geelong and Sydney game last night however I was left wondering if a nil all game of soccer between two world class sides is still a much better spectacle than a game of AFL where the winning side has 17 more scoring shots and yet only wins by 2 goals.

In a game where the goals have no cross bar or dedicated goal defender the inaccuracy of AFL is inexcusable sometimes.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Sweden 0-2 England

Image

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/44665445
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr7-HtVlAdI

Goals:
England - 30' (Maguire)
England - 58' (Alli)

Russia 2-2 Croatia
Croatia wins 4-3 on penalties

Image

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/44665444
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjU8j2bj3RY

Goals:
Russia - 31' (Cheryshev)
Croatia - 39' (Kramaric)
Croatia - 100' (Vida)
Russia - 115' (Figueira Fernandes)

Semi Finals:
- France v Belgium
- Croatia v England
Last edited by Jezza on Thu Jul 18, 2024 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Come on England.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Post Reply