VOTES Collingwood vs Bulldogs

Voting for the Gavin Brown Medal here

Moderators: David, bbmods

User avatar
Cuthbert Collingwood
Posts: 5186
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:53 am
Location: The BBC (Brunswick Bowling Club)

Post by Cuthbert Collingwood »

jolly was great in one respect today, the pressure was completely off fraser.

3 swan
2 o'brien
1 shaw
McRae for Governor-General!
User avatar
Captain_MyCaptain
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: home

Post by Captain_MyCaptain »

3 - O'Brien
2- Shaw
1- Wellingham

Sorry - Swan, Didak, Medhurst.
The window is open my friend!
User avatar
think positive
Posts: 40243
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: somewhere
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 105 times

Post by think positive »

o brien
didak
swan
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
User avatar
Laura
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:06 pm

Post by Laura »

3 - harry o
2 - heath shaw
1- wellingham

i wish there was a spot for medhurst too, he was unbelievable.
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

AN_Inkling wrote:
Defender wrote:
the fuzz wrote:
Defender wrote:
mudlark wrote: I think Defender showed his colours early in the year when he/She was bagging players before the season started. I'm sure He/She will never be satisfied.??? :roll:
which players where they? fraser? FWIW, if i want to give my opinion on best and woerst players i will, if you dont like it, F@#K OFF :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

but your right about one thing, yes, i am not F@#KING satified, are you?

Its round 1 and defender is already trying to defend him/herself!!!
unlike some people on this forum i dont wet my pants from excitment when we win the first game of the year, i will highlight the positives along with the negatives, the negatives need to be addressed sooner or later, why not now?
Good point. I propose dropping Jolly next week, and having Fraser ruck alone. He was much better today, both in the ruck and around the ground.
fras played really well.

as for me picking our best and worst players, get over it, its not that big a deal.

as for us beating the flag favourites, IMO, we're flag favoutites, ive rated us as since we aquired ball and jolly.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

Defender wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:
Defender wrote:
the fuzz wrote:
Defender wrote:which players where they? fraser? FWIW, if i want to give my opinion on best and woerst players i will, if you dont like it, F@#K OFF :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

but your right about one thing, yes, i am not F@#KING satified, are you?

Its round 1 and defender is already trying to defend him/herself!!!
unlike some people on this forum i dont wet my pants from excitment when we win the first game of the year, i will highlight the positives along with the negatives, the negatives need to be addressed sooner or later, why not now?
Good point. I propose dropping Jolly next week, and having Fraser ruck alone. He was much better today, both in the ruck and around the ground.
fras played really well.

as for me picking our best and worst players, get over it, its not that big a deal.

as for us beating the flag favourites, IMO, we're flag favoutites, ive rated us as since we aquired ball and jolly.
any chance you could just isolate your posts to your own thread seeing as you have the arrogance to think your views were worthy of their own thread?
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

jmcp wrote:
Defender wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:
Defender wrote:
the fuzz wrote:
Its round 1 and defender is already trying to defend him/herself!!!
unlike some people on this forum i dont wet my pants from excitment when we win the first game of the year, i will highlight the positives along with the negatives, the negatives need to be addressed sooner or later, why not now?
Good point. I propose dropping Jolly next week, and having Fraser ruck alone. He was much better today, both in the ruck and around the ground.
fras played really well.

as for me picking our best and worst players, get over it, its not that big a deal.

as for us beating the flag favourites, IMO, we're flag favoutites, ive rated us as since we aquired ball and jolly.
any chance you could just isolate your posts to your own thread seeing as you have the arrogance to think your views were worthy of their own thread?
get over it dipshit, its an internet forum, people start threads, didnt you know that? why dont you try adding something to this forum for a change?
alls you seam to do is bag my posts/threads mate, get a F@#KING life, dweeb.
User avatar
BingFa
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:56 pm

Post by BingFa »

It would be easier to name those who had a lesser impact on the field rather than trying to rate the better players. Jack Anthony, Travis Cloke, Daisy & Jolly!

Wellingham has to be the most improved player after his R1 game.

5. Heath Shaw
4. Harry O
3. Paul Medhurst
2. Dane Swan
1. Wellingham
User avatar
Neil Appleby
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 1998 11:10 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Neil Appleby »

Voting 5-1 is OK too. At least 5 players get recognition.
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

BingFa wrote:It would be easier to name those who had a lesser impact on the field rather than trying to rate the better players. Jack Anthony, Travis Cloke, Daisy & Jolly!

Wellingham has to be the most improved player after his R1 game.

5. Heath Shaw
4. Harry O
3. Paul Medhurst
2. Dane Swan
1. Wellingham
not allowed to bag players on this thread man, how dare you :lol:

wellers played well, really well, he could have a breakout year, fingers crossed.
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

3 - Shaw
2 - Maxwell
1 - O'Brien

They could be changed for each other.

Apologies to Wellingham.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19939
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 448 times
Been liked: 226 times

Post by Presti35 »

3. Heath

2. Harry

1. Sharrod
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Jace
Posts: 1016
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 1:42 pm

Post by Jace »

3. Heater
2. Swan
1. Harry
User avatar
ad4eva
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:00 pm
Location: The 'G'

Post by ad4eva »

3. Swan
2. Shaw
1. O' Brien

Unlucky; Didak, Medhurst, Wellingham, Brown.
sportingtragic
Posts: 439
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:24 pm

Post by sportingtragic »

Defender wrote: worst
thomas
thomas was just about best on ground.

its not about stats (although he had a more than reasonable 21 and a goal). daisy undertook one of the more important roles of the match, playing as a defensive forward tagging the dangerous rebound of ryan griffen. daisy stopped griffen's run off half back where dogs launch most attacks and hurt him going the other way. each to their own re player assessments but i dont understand ppl who just look at the stat sheet.

3. thomas
2. wellingham
1. shaw

johnno, who i wasnt convinced should even be picked, is unlucky for a similarly important job on akermanis in the second half. shut him down completely.
Post Reply