Pre-match: PIES v hawks - all comments here...
Moderator: bbmods
- DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
malthouse is been very speculative as well saying that the team he names tonight may be nothing like what lines up on thursday. He said that he is able to totally change the team and will not know on the availability of clement and didak until sunday. Im sure both are fine and malthouse is merely playing mind games
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
- lethalburns
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 3:01 pm
- daicos from the boundry
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 11:18 pm
- Location: 6ft under
-
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 4:29 pm
Here is the team as listed on the CFC site.
STARTING 18 AS NAMED:
B. Johnson S. Presti J. Clement
R. Lonie N. Maxwell T. Lockyer
P. Licuria S. O'Bree L. Davis
D. Thomas A. Rocca S. Burns
N. Buckley C. Tarrant J. Fraser
G. Richards B. Holland A. Didak
INTERCHANGE FROM:
D. Swan
S. Wakelin
J. Cloke
T. Cloke
B. Caracella
H. O'Brien
H. Shaw
My feeling is that MM will be unlikely to change too much.
He bangs on about playing a consistant lineup all the time.
We didn't lose by much and the rusty players where the main culprits.
Egan is dropped and rightly so.
Burns had somthing like 40 touched at Willi and is a 'walk up start'.
Swan had 30+ touches, why drop him?
Wakelin was OK, we need him game fit, why drop him?
Clement has been named in the 18, he will almost certaintly play.
The two Clokes are under pressure from O'Brian (Jase) and Cara (Trav).
But I would think you back these boys for another game.
So I reckon Burns in, Egan out.
... The thing I like most about the side named? Thomas in the starting 18!
If he can back it up this Sunday, I will be very happy.
GO PIES!
STARTING 18 AS NAMED:
B. Johnson S. Presti J. Clement
R. Lonie N. Maxwell T. Lockyer
P. Licuria S. O'Bree L. Davis
D. Thomas A. Rocca S. Burns
N. Buckley C. Tarrant J. Fraser
G. Richards B. Holland A. Didak
INTERCHANGE FROM:
D. Swan
S. Wakelin
J. Cloke
T. Cloke
B. Caracella
H. O'Brien
H. Shaw
My feeling is that MM will be unlikely to change too much.
He bangs on about playing a consistant lineup all the time.
We didn't lose by much and the rusty players where the main culprits.
Egan is dropped and rightly so.
Burns had somthing like 40 touched at Willi and is a 'walk up start'.
Swan had 30+ touches, why drop him?
Wakelin was OK, we need him game fit, why drop him?
Clement has been named in the 18, he will almost certaintly play.
The two Clokes are under pressure from O'Brian (Jase) and Cara (Trav).
But I would think you back these boys for another game.
So I reckon Burns in, Egan out.
... The thing I like most about the side named? Thomas in the starting 18!
If he can back it up this Sunday, I will be very happy.
GO PIES!
go pies!
- Magpiefan3
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Ponsford Stand N29
- DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
http://www.magpies.net/nick/article/art ... om=&ucat=4&
I have written a match preview. The link is above
I have written a match preview. The link is above
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
- uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
- Posts: 4929
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:43 pm
- Location: Under negotiation
- Mossi
- Posts: 3975
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Vittorio Veneto TV Italy
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 3 times
I would hope nothing is wrong with them; someone reported Clemo as having trained only for 20 mins, Didak I have no idea what could be wrong with him but it might explain the lack of manning up last Monday!RudeBoy wrote:I'd be happy with just the one change. Egan out, Burns in. Naturally if Clement or Didak are out due to injuries (which I doubt will happen), then we'd need to bring in O'Brien and/or Carracella.
-
- Posts: 16634
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 28 times
On the extended bench the Pies have named:
(a) Swan - Walk up start
(b) Wakelin - He's either fit or he's not. If fit, he's a walk up start.
(c) J.Cloke - Ahead of C3 on fitness and deserves another game, but at risk of losing his place to O'Brien if he doesn't perform.
(d) T.Cloke - If Richards holds together, we don't need another tall except to replace the ageing Wakes at CHB.
(e) O'Brien - Replacement for Clemo or Wakes if either fails to start. Replacement for C1 if he doesn't perform over the next couple of weeks.
(f) Caracella - If fit, he's a walk up start IF we need a small forward. Replacement for Davis, Thomas or Didak pending form and fitness.
(g) H.Shaw - If we need another runner, and we definitely do against the Hacks, he's the pick of the youngsters.
Assuming everyone is fit, I'd go with Swan, Wakelin, J.Cloke and H.Shaw. If either Clemo or Wakes doesn't pull up, then O'Brien gets the call up. If both don't pull up, then C3 also gets a call up - to CHB.
(a) Swan - Walk up start
(b) Wakelin - He's either fit or he's not. If fit, he's a walk up start.
(c) J.Cloke - Ahead of C3 on fitness and deserves another game, but at risk of losing his place to O'Brien if he doesn't perform.
(d) T.Cloke - If Richards holds together, we don't need another tall except to replace the ageing Wakes at CHB.
(e) O'Brien - Replacement for Clemo or Wakes if either fails to start. Replacement for C1 if he doesn't perform over the next couple of weeks.
(f) Caracella - If fit, he's a walk up start IF we need a small forward. Replacement for Davis, Thomas or Didak pending form and fitness.
(g) H.Shaw - If we need another runner, and we definitely do against the Hacks, he's the pick of the youngsters.
Assuming everyone is fit, I'd go with Swan, Wakelin, J.Cloke and H.Shaw. If either Clemo or Wakes doesn't pull up, then O'Brien gets the call up. If both don't pull up, then C3 also gets a call up - to CHB.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:34 pm
- Location: Glen Waverley
like the look of the ins
burns & cara can be played both up forward & on the ball, both know how to hit a target too!!
playing cara may mean didak gets more time in the middle, please let this be true!!!
harry o down back is a better choice against hawthorn then wakes as hawks, (like adelaide) dont have really big forwards, more athlete types!!
if clemo plays we are in good shape for de hawks
ink in J.Fraser for BOG
burns & cara can be played both up forward & on the ball, both know how to hit a target too!!
playing cara may mean didak gets more time in the middle, please let this be true!!!
harry o down back is a better choice against hawthorn then wakes as hawks, (like adelaide) dont have really big forwards, more athlete types!!
if clemo plays we are in good shape for de hawks
ink in J.Fraser for BOG
my bum is on the swedish