Post Match v Dees...all comments here thanks!
Moderator: bbmods
- i_luv_tarkyn!
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Missed the game due to an exam, and then worked so havent seen or heard any of the game just the result.
Shattered about Rhyce ... he has really turned his career around and I hope that this injury doesnt affect his game.
Just wondering how Tarkyn played?
who he played on, etc.
Thank you
luv jess
Shattered about Rhyce ... he has really turned his career around and I hope that this injury doesnt affect his game.
Just wondering how Tarkyn played?
who he played on, etc.
Thank you
luv jess
LIVESTRONG
- COLEingwood
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Sultan of spin
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:43 pm
- Location: Burnley
- COLEingwood
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Melbourne
well i disagree davey was too skilful and left tarks behind....
his kicking was just about shocking today... and like obree not worth getting that much of the ball if your gonna turn it over or kick it no where..
was not happy with him at all today.... he was briliant on jnr ablert but this week he was not very good at all.
his kicking was just about shocking today... and like obree not worth getting that much of the ball if your gonna turn it over or kick it no where..
was not happy with him at all today.... he was briliant on jnr ablert but this week he was not very good at all.
- i_luv_tarkyn!
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Oh well, at least he is getting the ball.
Looks like Mick will keep playing him in the back pocket.
I thought Ablett would have been too quick for him but he did pretty well and got more of the ball.
The problem is does it hurt the opposition?
This week it doesnt sound like it did
Thank you for your comments, much appreciated on my fav boy
Jess
Looks like Mick will keep playing him in the back pocket.
I thought Ablett would have been too quick for him but he did pretty well and got more of the ball.
The problem is does it hurt the opposition?
This week it doesnt sound like it did
Thank you for your comments, much appreciated on my fav boy
Jess
LIVESTRONG
- COLEingwood
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Melbourne
well we had a a great first half, fraser wasn't even at the MCG he may has well of sat on the bench and his lack of ability to aid in effective hit outs to give us clearances hurt us terribly, as for swan, he didn't do his job, his opponent kicked four quick goals whether he tried his guts out or not he got flogged. C2 was ok, but is capable of better.
Once again Tarrant was being smothered by a defense that thought they were in a grappling match, really how much more before Tarrant snaps and cracks a full back for holding him, my bet not long.
if we look at the game as a single half (the first) we actually looked a good side, playing good footy, but as the old legs got tired the young chins dropped and Yze buried us into the second half of the ladder.......
Once again Tarrant was being smothered by a defense that thought they were in a grappling match, really how much more before Tarrant snaps and cracks a full back for holding him, my bet not long.
if we look at the game as a single half (the first) we actually looked a good side, playing good footy, but as the old legs got tired the young chins dropped and Yze buried us into the second half of the ladder.......
- lethalburns
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 3:01 pm
You may laugh but I think Cole would have been more valueable than someone like Morrison today.
Especially since we were short on options for Yze. Cole is not too bad defensively, it is his disposal under pressure that lets him down.
Much like Shaw he has copped it since 2003. Unfortunately, unlike Shaw he has not been free'd up.
Makes you wonder when we will see Cole in the middle as promised.
I guess never and our supporters will continue to stick the boots in till he is traded to Essendon for pick 1984356.
Especially since we were short on options for Yze. Cole is not too bad defensively, it is his disposal under pressure that lets him down.
Much like Shaw he has copped it since 2003. Unfortunately, unlike Shaw he has not been free'd up.
Makes you wonder when we will see Cole in the middle as promised.
I guess never and our supporters will continue to stick the boots in till he is traded to Essendon for pick 1984356.
-
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 8:09 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Disappointing effort but lets take the good with the bad and try to learn a few things from it I spose.
Not sure what they were thinking with Lonie but in a tough physical game like we saw today he showed clearly why he should be given the flick, our club has no room for guys that look as though they would fit in better at the Sydney Mardi-Gras.
Lonie - Nuff said, put him straight into the Can't play basket along with Walker and Willams.
Burns - Worked hard, displays everything that a supporter wants to see in their players.
Lockyer - I have been critical of him alot this year but liked his game today, one fo the few we had that regularly hit a target.
Wakelin - Did a couple of nice things then got taken off, moved around ETC, NFI what Malthouse was thinking.
Fraser - Not up to it, giving him the benifit of the doubt you could argue that it is just form in which case he should be playing for Williamstown, Fanning would be far more competitive at the moment.
Not alot of players to mention but it was that sort of game with Melbourne cutting us up in the middle and particularly the clearances, Travis Johnston & Nathan Brown's passing to their leading forwards was something spectacular today and gave our defenders little chance while at the other end our forward line was never really in the game simply because they were getting nothing from the middle where our mids were always under pressure and could really only hack the ball forward.
Not sure what they were thinking with Lonie but in a tough physical game like we saw today he showed clearly why he should be given the flick, our club has no room for guys that look as though they would fit in better at the Sydney Mardi-Gras.
Lonie - Nuff said, put him straight into the Can't play basket along with Walker and Willams.
Burns - Worked hard, displays everything that a supporter wants to see in their players.
Lockyer - I have been critical of him alot this year but liked his game today, one fo the few we had that regularly hit a target.
Wakelin - Did a couple of nice things then got taken off, moved around ETC, NFI what Malthouse was thinking.
Fraser - Not up to it, giving him the benifit of the doubt you could argue that it is just form in which case he should be playing for Williamstown, Fanning would be far more competitive at the moment.
Not alot of players to mention but it was that sort of game with Melbourne cutting us up in the middle and particularly the clearances, Travis Johnston & Nathan Brown's passing to their leading forwards was something spectacular today and gave our defenders little chance while at the other end our forward line was never really in the game simply because they were getting nothing from the middle where our mids were always under pressure and could really only hack the ball forward.
- DaVe86
- Posts: 13731
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:04 pm
- Location: Melbourne
what are you guys talking about, tarkyn was best on field for us today. Davey did not kick a goal and was held in the 2nd and third quarter whilst tarkyn notched up 30 touches. Tarkyn was by far more damaging than davey. Davey was forced to look after lockyer and any touches davey got were in the middle and not effective. Tarkyn drew davey out of the goals and into the middle where he was not comfortable.
Im the biggest tarks bagger but he was our best today by far. His kicking however is way down on what it used to be.
Im the biggest tarks bagger but he was our best today by far. His kicking however is way down on what it used to be.
There's more to life than footy.........just not much more.
- COLEingwood
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- COLEingwood
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- lethalburns
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 3:01 pm