Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Moderator: bbmods
- shawthing
- Posts: 2920
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:54 pm
- Location: Victoria Park
- Has liked: 5 times
- Been liked: 97 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Anyone else sick of how lucky a club Geelong is. Not only will they set up a G preliminary there's no doubt they will pick up more players in the trade period. They do it every year. They never get too old. Watch them waltz to another GF this year.
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Cats 85-44.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Ken Hinkley's record in finals is abysmal.
3 finals wins in his first two seasons as coach. Only 2 finals wins in the next 10 seasons after that.
3 finals wins in his first two seasons as coach. Only 2 finals wins in the next 10 seasons after that.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Can't get it done. They really should have sacked him a few seasons ago.
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Geelong 100-45 at 3QT.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Probably should've happened about five years ago.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Cats 106-52.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Cats 120-53. Too easy from Geelong.
Port have been embarrassing.
Port have been embarrassing.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
79 points now. 132-53.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
132 to 53. "Embarrassing" is probably too polite a description for what Hinkley's Losers have dished up tonight. Horne-Francis will be wondering whether he should have stuck with North.
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Re: Finals. Week 1. Port v. Cats
Geelong won 138-54.
They won the second half by 64 points (75-11).
They won the second half by 64 points (75-11).
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |