#31 Beau McCreery

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
piffdog
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 46 times

Post by piffdog »

Anyone else think that McCreery could find himself squeezed a little through the season? We seem to have a lot of pressure forwards. I’m not sure there’s going to be any space for him in the middle.
With the “preseason” caveat, he had some c-grade ammo’s moments in the first q of the trial yesterday - although quite a few looked fumbly. I’m sure that will improve as we go forward.
I agree with others that the main goal of yesterday was no injuries and looks like that was successful.
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
User avatar
LaurieHolden
Posts: 3809
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:04 am
Location: Victoria Park
Has liked: 174 times
Been liked: 176 times

Post by LaurieHolden »

^Based on the practice game? Or in general?
The practice game for me is exactly that. It's the equivalent of going to the driving range so I'm not looking to these as ones I'll be assessing a player's ability or broader contribution to our side.

FWIW, I'm hoping the pre-season comp soon becomes a thing of the past.
These mickey mouse matches are nothing more than community engagement exercises. By all means, run community camps, but make them training camps.
If we're going to risk players, risk them with 4 points at stake.

Reality is though, he's not damaging enough on a number of key statistics to hold a HFF position alone and not be at risk of natural attrition. But that also has to come from those vying for a starting senior spot.
Harrison will be on his hammer by seasons end.
Ask me again at the mid-season break and we'll have sufficient body of work to make an informed assessment regarding his ability to rotate through the middle if he's given the opportunity, which I'm sure well see.
Last edited by LaurieHolden on Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:59 am, edited 2 times in total.
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers
piffdog
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 46 times

Post by piffdog »

LaurieHolden wrote:^Based on the practice game? Or in general?
I have to say in general, because I agree with you that 20 minutes in a practice game in Feb cannot be the benchmark...

I like him as a player, and he has some great highlights, but he's going to be behind Schultz, Elliott and Hill (at least) in the HFF role you flagged, and there should hopefully be some young whipper snappers striving. If they want to play both Reef and Johnson that also probably puts more pressure on how many smaller forwards you can play. Perhaps theyre grooming him for the Adams role from last year - 10-15% midfield?

It's a hard role to play - one where you can be a little invisible if you dont kick 2-3 or have 8 score involvements and those other three guys have proven to be able to make the moments that catch the eye.

Anyway - I wish him well and lets see if he can lift his game in either that position or another. We saw last year how he, WHE, Lipinski, Ginnivan, Noble and potentially Mitchell were all in that 19-25th position in the team. Hopefully spots can be demanded rather than opened up duje to significant injury - although there is bound to be some of those too.

I do enjoy his bone crunching tackles - I liken them to folding someone in half like you were packing them into a suitcase.
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22085
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 85 times

Post by RudeBoy »

McCreery is way, way ahead of Reef in terms of selection. He is a gun player, set to take off in 2024. Reef is yet to even demonstrate he is good enough to play senior footy.
mgh3536
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by mgh3536 »

The pressure hill and Schulz bring puts pressure on mcreery as lipinski will spend time through middle and fwd.

Miocheck, Elliott, cox/Cameron are certainties
Hill and Schultz are definite

So you are left with 1 of McInnes/Johnson/ Kruger/mcstay/ mcreery
Depending on the day and opposition
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 20 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

It's a tough caper sometimes. Hypothetically, would Schultz be a better option at HFF, and would Reef slot deep into the forward line ?
So whilst on paper it would read OUT : McCreery IN Reef, the forward setup is different.
Repeat, it's a hypothetical.
BazBoy
Posts: 11052
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:38 am
Been liked: 37 times

Post by BazBoy »

Sure Fly and Co will get the best possible team chemistry
And why not. They got it right last year
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
Rex
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2023 3:07 pm

Post by Rex »

mgh3536 wrote: Miocheck, Elliott, cox/Cameron are certainties
Hill and Schultz are definite
So you are left with 1 of McInnes/Johnson/ Kruger/mcstay/ mcreery
Depending on the day and opposition
I agree with your certainties/definites, but they account for four forwards, not five. One ruck is always named on the bench with six genuine forwards named in the 18. That means two of Johnson, McIness or McCreery make it. Krueger only gets in if the others are injured. If Harrison’s good enough to force his way in we will be in an excellent position.
Although McInnes has only played fwd at Collingwood he came to us as a big-bodied mid. This preseason we’ve seen a bit of that skill set. For that reason he might push McCreery out. It may depend on match-ups.
And I’d be surprised if Elliott gets through the whole season without weeks off. So expect players to rotate through.
And in the latter third when McStay’s fit…what a dilemma the coaches will have!
User avatar
Magpietothemax
Posts: 7985
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 15 times

Post by Magpietothemax »

RudeBoy wrote:McCreery is way, way ahead of Reef in terms of selection. He is a gun player, set to take off in 2024. Reef is yet to even demonstrate he is good enough to play senior footy.
Agree with this. I am anticipating a breakout year from Beauu. He has elite speed and strength, and I am sure he is going to play a more prominent midfield role.
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54687
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 85 times
Been liked: 95 times

Post by stui magpie »

RudeBoy wrote:McCreery is way, way ahead of Reef in terms of selection. He is a gun player, set to take off in 2024. Reef is yet to even demonstrate he is good enough to play senior footy.
Agreed, but very different players and fill different roles.

Reef is the tall forward option, Beau is a pressure small forward who shows signs of being an impacting mid.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
duke750
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Buderim QLD

Post by duke750 »

Beau could easily have kicked 4 or more goals in the GF. I think he is currently comfortably picked in the best 22. Of course, that could change as the season goes on, but I hope that he is able to improve his game even more.

It appears to me that the coaching group want the talls in the forward line to contest and not be outmarked. They see the pace and smarts of our pack of small forwards as a big asset.
Magpies forever.
First Colligwood game: Western Oval 1960
User avatar
WhyPhilWhy?
Posts: 9512
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: Location: Location:
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 26 times

Post by WhyPhilWhy? »

A team that can't fit Beau into its best 23 is travelling pretty well, I'd say.
piffdog
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2021 10:55 am
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 46 times

Post by piffdog »

duke750 wrote: I think he is currently comfortably picked in the best 22.
FWIW so do I for round zero - but just curious to see how that looks when we are half way through the season...
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
Pies2016
Posts: 6768
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by Pies2016 »

I just don’t see McCreery as a midfielder, particularly while he’s at Collingwood. Hes currently behind DeGoey, Nick, Mitchell, Pendles, Crisp Sullivan, MacRae, Lipinski and likely DiMattia ( in 12 months ) who all have attributes that are more suitable to starting in the centre square than McCreery. It’s not a knock on McCreery, he plays his role very well …. just as our true midfielders play their roles very well too.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54687
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 85 times
Been liked: 95 times

Post by stui magpie »

Pies2016 wrote:I just don’t see McCreery as a midfielder, particularly while he’s at Collingwood. Hes currently behind DeGoey, Nick, Mitchell, Pendles, Crisp Sullivan, MacRae, Lipinski and likely DiMattia ( in 12 months ) who all have attributes that are more suitable to starting in the centre square than McCreery. It’s not a knock on McCreery, he plays his role very well …. just as our true midfielders play their roles very well too.
keep in mind that De Goey started as a forward with the occasional burst in the midfield. Beau is still young and explosive. If an inside mid gets the ball and gives it to him on the burst he can fly out of the centre just like Jordy. He's also a tackling machine in there.

With more experience and focusing on using his strengths I can see him becoming a midfield weapon.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Post Reply