Umpiring rants ~ receive our scorn
Moderator: bbmods
- Piesnchess
- Posts: 26206
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
- Has liked: 230 times
- Been liked: 94 times
Ive been saying for ages we should say something and cop the fine , just cop it and get it off our chest, but the club wont do it, shame. It wont change, been going on for ages, but nobody says a word from the club.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
- doriswilgus
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:02 pm
- Location: the great southern land
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
Forever greatful for the out on the full!doriswilgus wrote:They did everything they could to get Adelaide over the line.Even in the last minute when the ball was trapped in our forward fifty they gave them a soft free kick,which gave them another chance to score.But fortunately for us,they didn’t.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- princem007
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:50 pm
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: melbourne, victoria
- David
- Posts: 50690
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: the edge of the deep green sea
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 84 times
I don’t usually have a go at the umpires and I don’t believe in any anti-Collingwood agenda, but I do think there’s an anti-Ginnivan agenda. That holding the ball free against him was one of the most disgraceful decisions I’ve ever seen. Should have been a free against Walker if anything.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
- Greening gold
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:22 am
- Location: Narooma - NSW South Coast
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 1 time
When Jack Ginnivan is on the ground, he wears the Cloak of Invisibility as far as the umpires are concerned.
And as for Pendles questioning what was clearly a mistake by an umpire who reads too much media rubbish, the umpires and the league should grow up and learn the difference between dissent and abuse. Infallibility is a Papal prerogative, to which the AFL and its umpiring cohort have no claim.
And as for Pendles questioning what was clearly a mistake by an umpire who reads too much media rubbish, the umpires and the league should grow up and learn the difference between dissent and abuse. Infallibility is a Papal prerogative, to which the AFL and its umpiring cohort have no claim.
If you used to barrack for the 'Pies, you never barracked for the 'Pies.
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
Ginnivan dived for the ball and didn't get rid of it. That's my interpretation for the HTB decision. There was another one, I can't remember exactly.David wrote:I don’t usually have a go at the umpires and I don’t believe in any anti-Collingwood agenda, but I do think there’s an anti-Ginnivan agenda. That holding the ball free against him was one of the most disgraceful decisions I’ve ever seen. Should have been a free against Walker if anything.
Usually, I say, sure, that's the rule, but in the wet, it seems a bit crazy to be penalising the player going for the ball.
Thankfully, the umpires were lenient on the kicking in danger. There were quite a few hacks at the ball with the foot that in most other games would have been paid as a kicking in danger.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Ginni had the ball behind him, between his ankles, he had zero chance to get it out. The umpiring was crap.What'sinaname wrote:Ginnivan dived for the ball and didn't get rid of it. That's my interpretation for the HTB decision. There was another one, I can't remember exactly.David wrote:I don’t usually have a go at the umpires and I don’t believe in any anti-Collingwood agenda, but I do think there’s an anti-Ginnivan agenda. That holding the ball free against him was one of the most disgraceful decisions I’ve ever seen. Should have been a free against Walker if anything.
Usually, I say, sure, that's the rule, but in the wet, it seems a bit crazy to be penalising the player going for the ball.
Thankfully, the umpires were lenient on the kicking in danger. There were quite a few hacks at the ball with the foot that in most other games would have been paid as a kicking in danger.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- stoliboy
- Posts: 4979
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:44 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Umpiring today
Adelaide fans.Mr Miyagi wrote:Anyone want to defend it?
Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/
- warburton lad
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:47 am
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 60 times
Strap yourselves in folks.
The crucifixion of jack Ginnivan will continue until he is knocked unconscious or retires from the game- a broken man.
In my time, I have seen the line drawn across the centre circle (in response to Peter Moore rucking against Gary Dempsey; 'The Gayfer Rule' which saw him umpired out of a job; the change to the number of allowable interchanges to negate Swanny's influence on games and now 'The Ginnivan Rule'.
This lad was denied a free kick (blatantly around the neck) and then a minute later, an Adelaide Crow player got a free for the same type of incident.
Im not sure if the umpiring was worse than the commentary (Kelli Underwood- "it would be heartbreaking to see the Crows lose...") not from lounge room, toots.
Get ready for some really shite umpiring against us as we near a potential finals spot.
The crucifixion of jack Ginnivan will continue until he is knocked unconscious or retires from the game- a broken man.
In my time, I have seen the line drawn across the centre circle (in response to Peter Moore rucking against Gary Dempsey; 'The Gayfer Rule' which saw him umpired out of a job; the change to the number of allowable interchanges to negate Swanny's influence on games and now 'The Ginnivan Rule'.
This lad was denied a free kick (blatantly around the neck) and then a minute later, an Adelaide Crow player got a free for the same type of incident.
Im not sure if the umpiring was worse than the commentary (Kelli Underwood- "it would be heartbreaking to see the Crows lose...") not from lounge room, toots.
Get ready for some really shite umpiring against us as we near a potential finals spot.
Firm in the belief that number 17 flag is only months away...
- MatthewBoydFanClub
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Elwood
- Been liked: 1 time
Re: Umpiring today
I'll defend it. Last week's game against North Melbourne deserved the royal commission. Umpiring today was just par for the course. We need to accept that the umpires hate us and learn to cop it. However when they blatantly attempt to cheat us out of winning on our merits as they did last week the club admin needs to step in and take it to the top of the AFL.stoliboy wrote:Adelaide fans.Mr Miyagi wrote:Anyone want to defend it?
- MatthewBoydFanClub
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:02 pm
- Location: Elwood
- Been liked: 1 time
Yep. This. We have to learn to accept it because this what we cop every week. I don't care if we lose the free kick count as long as the umpires show some sort of consistency. Ginnivan didn't get the free kicks around the neck this week, but neither did the Adelaide players, so I just let it go to the standard of umpiring I expect. Ginnivan has to stop his practice of waiting for the free kick when he's tackled. None of our other players do it. Just keep playing the ball and behave as though it's play on.warburton lad wrote:Strap yourselves in folks.
The crucifixion of jack Ginnivan will continue until he is knocked unconscious or retires from the game- a broken man.
In my time, I have seen the line drawn across the centre circle (in response to Peter Moore rucking against Gary Dempsey; 'The Gayfer Rule' which saw him umpired out of a job; the change to the number of allowable interchanges to negate Swanny's influence on games and now 'The Ginnivan Rule'.
This lad was denied a free kick (blatantly around the neck) and then a minute later, an Adelaide Crow player got a free for the same type of incident.
Im not sure if the umpiring was worse than the commentary (Kelli Underwood- "it would be heartbreaking to see the Crows lose...") not from lounge room, toots.
Get ready for some really shite umpiring against us as we near a potential finals spot.
The umpires just need to umpire him the way they umpire everybody else. They're actually arseholes - it's a blight on the competition that opposition players are now allowed to attack him from all angles with impunity. The "head-high tackle moratorium" doesn't even begin to cover it. He is allowed to be scragged going for marks, pushed in the back, held when not in possession and lined up for phyiscal punishment that, if dished out to other players, would be reportable. It's time the Club started speaking abvout this publicly and without restraint. Imagine what Hardwick would do if players were suddenly allowed to play like this against Martin, or what Clarkson would do if players were suddenly allowed to play like this against Cyril Rioli. It's shameful and the people in charge of umpiring should actually be embarrassed about it.