#11 Daniel McStay

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19608
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 98 times

Post by Presti35 »

The rumour is an unnamed Victorian club has made an offer to McStay that could be in the vicinity of a six-years and $600,000 per season.
Is he worth that? He'll be 32 by the time that contract would end. I wonder which club it is?
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
mattdally
Posts: 1471
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times
Contact:

Post by mattdally »

Better not be us.
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

What about Lukosius at the GC? Rumors of discontent from him, not enjoying where he is being played apparently....younger and more upside than McStay
"You hate a mean man, a grasping man, a man who wants everything and gives nothing. That’s Collingwood. They are a law unto themselves"

Jack 'Captain Blood' Dyer
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

Pies2016 wrote:Easily the best tall forward in the upcoming draft is a man child called Harry Lemmey from S A.
Lemmey eh? I like it, could be our 'Ace of Spades'?
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:What about Lukosius at the GC? Rumors of discontent from him, not enjoying where he is being played apparently....younger and more upside than McStay
Linguini arms
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Ronnie McKeowns boots
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm

Post by Ronnie McKeowns boots »

inxs88 wrote:Linguini arms
Can be addressed, kid has class
User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7853
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:What about Lukosius at the GC? Rumors of discontent from him, not enjoying where he is being played apparently....younger and more upside than McStay
If he’s not happy being played as a forward at GC (which is where he’s been playing this year) then why would he be happy playing as a forward for us?
We need someone who is 195cm plus, 100 kgs and a proper forward. Look to the state leagues and bring one in during this mid season draft.
Mihocek needs help!!
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19608
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 98 times

Post by Presti35 »

A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 44974
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Been liked: 8 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Presti35 wrote:The rumour is an unnamed Victorian club has made an offer to McStay that could be in the vicinity of a six-years and $600,000 per season.

Is he worth that? He'll be 32 by the time that contract would end. I wonder which club it is?
Money be okay but Not the Contract Length
I am Da Man
inxs88
Posts: 6406
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Post by inxs88 »

* his body shape hasn't altered much in 4 seasons
* doesn't kick goals
* has the intensity of Jack Watts type
* doesn't play like a monster
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
User avatar
Boogie Knights
Posts: 762
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:00 pm

Post by Boogie Knights »

Lukosius is not a key forward. He's more suited as a third tall defender or tall running wing. His field kicking is sublime and he reads the play well behind the ball. He is not a solution to KPF woes.

McStay has garnered attention on the back of 1 very good game earlier in the season - after playing for 9 odd seasons and 100+ games. At best, he is a complementary tall forward and not a focal piece. It's all well and good to have complementary tall forwards, as long as they are complementing someone other than another complementary piece. He is not the answer as we have Checkers who does what McStay does, only much better. The difference is that McStay has Daniher and Hipwood to compliment and we have noone of that caliber (regardless of whether you like or appreciate those 2).

We have a tall mobile option in Krueger (if his body is up to it) and a perfect complimentary tall in Checkers. What we need is a number 1, a definite, game changing power forward. These don't grow on trees and thinking a bit player or a positional shift from a player at another club is the answer is just not going to work.

It's a top end draft pick, or a very big trade/FA that gets it done.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

If up until now McStay had shown some ability in key defence as well as up forward you could probably build a case for him but alas I don't believe that to be the case so it's a no from me.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
E

Post by E »

Boogie Knights wrote:Lukosius is not a key forward. He's more suited as a third tall defender or tall running wing. His field kicking is sublime and he reads the play well behind the ball. He is not a solution to KPF woes.

McStay has garnered attention on the back of 1 very good game earlier in the season - after playing for 9 odd seasons and 100+ games. At best, he is a complementary tall forward and not a focal piece. It's all well and good to have complementary tall forwards, as long as they are complementing someone other than another complementary piece. He is not the answer as we have Checkers who does what McStay does, only much better. The difference is that McStay has Daniher and Hipwood to compliment and we have noone of that caliber (regardless of whether you like or appreciate those 2).

We have a tall mobile option in Krueger (if his body is up to it) and a perfect complimentary tall in Checkers. What we need is a number 1, a definite, game changing power forward. These don't grow on trees and thinking a bit player or a positional shift from a player at another club is the answer is just not going to work.

It's a top end draft pick, or a very big trade/FA that gets it done.
and by the way, when we get him, we'll all bitch and moan that we paid overs and shouldnt have done that to retain top talent......

You should look at the top 20 breadwinners in the AFL. It now includes Cameron and Joe Daniher.

Could you imagine the gaskets that would have blown if we paid $900k per year for Daniher and he didnt kick 19 goals a game!!
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19608
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 98 times

Post by Presti35 »

Lukosius not great on Sunday. But it was his first game back from injury.

Bit of talk about he and Rankine leaving. When looking at Will Brodie, perhaps taking a chance on a Suns reject could pan out.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
User avatar
BBHS
Posts: 4970
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Bellarine
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 7 times

Post by BBHS »

GC with horrific development record. You would look closely at all their high picks that haven't come on imo
Post Reply