Post Match. Pies down to WC . All comments.

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Donny
Posts: 80336
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
Has liked: 65 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Donny »

Collingwood 10.14.74
WCE 14.3.87

Goals: Checkers, Ginnivan 2, Maynard, Cameron, Wilson, J Daics, H-E, Henry 1.

Tackles: Elliott 9, Grundy 6, Brown, N Daics 5.

D/E: Howe 92.9%, Pendles 91.3, Lipinski 90.5, Maynard 90

Disposals: N Daics 32, J Daics 28, Crisp 25, Pendles 23, Lipinski, Maynard 22, Grundy 19, Wilson 16, Brown 15, Howe, Sidey, Elliott, Ginnivan, Moore, Checkers 14, Noble 13, IQ 11.

AFs: N Daics 126, Grundy 124, J Daics 107, Crisp 94, Maynard 88,
Last edited by Donny on Sat Apr 09, 2022 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Donny.

It's a game. Enjoy it. :D
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20136
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 35 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Big T wrote:Defensively we have been poor all year
yep. Moore has been so bad this year and now we have 6 more years at 900k
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17243
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

Some shocking umpiring decisions but that isn't the reason we lost. Set shots were disgraceful, bad kicking bad football. I will captain obvious here, losing two big mids is a killer for any team.
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20136
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 35 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Culprit wrote:Some shocking umpiring decisions but that isn't the reason we lost. Set shots were disgraceful, bad kicking bad football. I will captain obvious here, losing two big mids is a killer for any team.
WC say hi!!!

They were missing their entire midfield
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

Get on BRIS for 40+ winning margin. Nothing surer.
Est. 2002
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

Get on BRIS for 40+ winning margin. Nothing surer.
Est. 2002
User avatar
Big T
Posts: 10228
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 82 times

Post by Big T »

What'sinaname wrote:
Big T wrote:Defensively we have been poor all year
yep. Moore has been so bad this year and now we have 6 more years at 900k
It's history repeating. We r such a stupid club.

Predicting strained quad next week and then a laughing hug with opposition after the game.
Buon Giorno
User avatar
Haff
Posts: 5027
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 1:24 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 55 times

Post by Haff »

What'sinaname wrote:
Culprit wrote:Some shocking umpiring decisions but that isn't the reason we lost. Set shots were disgraceful, bad kicking bad football. I will captain obvious here, losing two big mids is a killer for any team.
WC say hi!!!

They were missing their entire midfield
We had 7 more than they did. No excuse.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

What'sinaname wrote:
Culprit wrote:Some shocking umpiring decisions but that isn't the reason we lost. Set shots were disgraceful, bad kicking bad football. I will captain obvious here, losing two big mids is a killer for any team.
WC say hi!!!

They were missing their entire midfield
But they have a quality forward line and a solid defence.

We had a midfield and not much else.

But yes still pathetically embarrassing considering 90% of football is apparently ‘won in the midfield’.
Est. 2002
User avatar
Raw Hammer
Posts: 7353
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: The Gutter
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Post by Raw Hammer »

What'sinaname wrote:
Big T wrote:Defensively we have been poor all year
yep. Moore has been so bad this year and now we have 6 more years at 900k
833K. Get your maths right.
Est. 2002
User avatar
Greening gold
Posts: 1703
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:22 am
Location: Narooma - NSW South Coast
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Greening gold »

Human nature - As soon as a player gets that long contract that can buy a house every year, they lose their hunger. Got life sorted, so no need to bust my guts any more.
If you used to barrack for the 'Pies, you never barracked for the 'Pies.
User avatar
Johnno75
Posts: 4937
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:29 am
Location: Wantirna
Been liked: 48 times

Post by Johnno75 »

Centre clearances stats wise 13-10 in favour of WCE. Look at the quality though. I reckon 10 of WCE went inside 50 and they got some scores out of it. We were lucky if 2 of ours went inside 50, most ended up wide on the wing.

They had no names in the middle but they kept winning it.
Human behavioural studies suggest people who use a lot of swear words tend to be more honest & trustworthy.
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

Big T wrote:
derkd wrote:A top eight finish this year (while making us feel better) might actually be detrimental to our build. We need quality high picks.
Agree. Should be aiming for bottom 3.
Have said this many times but wondered if posters here are capable of being patient. I still think this is the way to go, give invaluable experience to young players while probably playing in losing teams and simultaneously getting crucial high draft picks.
Last edited by Lazza on Sat Apr 09, 2022 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
User avatar
What'sinaname
Posts: 20136
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Living rent free
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 35 times

Post by What'sinaname »

Raw Hammer wrote:
What'sinaname wrote:
Big T wrote:Defensively we have been poor all year
yep. Moore has been so bad this year and now we have 6 more years at 900k
833K. Get your maths right.
Oh cool, the $67,000 can pay for the pink footy boots that these posers like to wear
User avatar
Monco Matt
Posts: 3093
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:47 am
Location: Sittin, Drinkin, Reloadin & Waitin

Post by Monco Matt »

We are a bottom 4 team and this is what bottom 4 teams do. Too much inexperience on the field. Should still have won but we were too wasteful inside 50 as always and they were incredibly efficient and that was the game. Our depth is poor, we can't cover DeGoey and Adams out of that midfield. DeGoey would have kicked 3 tonight and setup a couple.

No key forwards and a defence that cannot defend one-on-one were standouts. Moore is over-rated and does not give us much, what is wrong with him? Terrible in the air, can't hold his ground, gets caught out of position, can't rebound, drops marks, fumbles and misses targets, diabolical. Geez, I hope we are not paying him $990k.

Just our inability to find a way to win is disturbing. We are impotent in final quarters, just cannot seem to do anything right. Long season ahead.
RED "BABY" CAVANAUGH: Didn't hear what the bet was.

MONCO: Your life.
Post Reply