Post Match. Cats pip Pies All comments.
Moderator: bbmods
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:59 am
- Been liked: 2 times
Exactly. Footballers are conformist fashion monkeys. 10 years ago it was sleeve tattoos; 5 years ago, top knots. These days they all want to be new-wave synth players from 1982. God knows how their girlfriends are the ones who teach them how to kick, though.duke750 wrote:I must admit I hate it when forwards take set shot within 40 and proceed to kick around their bodies. Elliot could have gone back and run straight towards the goal, rather than tying to kick sideways.
Good key forwards trust their kicking in set shots.
Absolutely Dave, particularly in the last qtr. it’s a direct reflection of the Cats dominance in the middle and quick ball movement when they were forced to play come from behind footy. I’m guessing the Cats would have also set up higher up the ground and simply let Hawkins and Cameron win the ball one out.Dave The Man wrote:I felt we Pushed too far up the Ground as quite often we got Caught out the Back when we turned the Ball Over
We can point fingers at defenders but if all starts at the source and as others have posted, you need your very best mids ( and ruck ) in the middle if you want to wrestle back the momentum.
I have always felt goals out the back or joe the goose’s are a reflection of where a teams head is at. It really did look like we lost the plot in the last qtr.
- Hiss
- Posts: 4821
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:28 pm
- Location: Geelong
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 3 times
- Contact:
No La
Nonsense! We pushed to a forward line that can’t hold their ground against old talls that Geelong have that use their daddy bods to simply stop us getting the football. It’s time we got some big tough old dads to deal with this instead of some of our Lycra Nancy types who stand no chance . Recruit mongrels instead of players who a more suited to the Australian Ballet Company.Dave The Man wrote:I felt we Pushed too far up the Ground as quite often we got Caught out the Back when we turned the Ball Over
I love this club and I hold anyone in contempt who does not think it is worth fighting for.
Re: No La
Who are some of the "mongrels" at other AFL clubs that you'd like to see in our forward line?Hiss wrote:Nonsense! We pushed to a forward line that can’t hold their ground against old talls that Geelong have that use their daddy bods to simply stop us getting the football. It’s time we got some big tough old dads to deal with this instead of some of our Lycra Nancy types who stand no chance . Recruit mongrels instead of players who a more suited to the Australian Ballet Company.Dave The Man wrote:I felt we Pushed too far up the Ground as quite often we got Caught out the Back when we turned the Ball Over
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
I was not 100% Sure we had not won it at 3 Qtr Time but I thought we might of done better then we didswoop42 wrote:Had an awful feeling we weren't safe at 3/4 time.
Our game style is taxing and if you just examine last week we didn't do a hell of a lot for 2 quarters with 12 of our 15 goals coming in the 1st and 3rd quarters.
We simply don't have the legs to play the way we want for 4 quarters and the missed opportunities across the first 3 quarters cost us dearly in the end.
I am Da Man
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:39 pm
Didn’t expect a win going in, but that third quarter made it worth the watch. Feel we lost it by not converting in the first half. Last quarter was tough, but it seemed just about every bounce of the ball and 50/50 decision went Geelong’s way. Can’t really complain about that either, as it went our way in the third.
This year was just hoping to be entertained, see a more edited style of footy, and watch development of the youngsters. Far from disappointed thus far!
Looking forward to next week.
This year was just hoping to be entertained, see a more edited style of footy, and watch development of the youngsters. Far from disappointed thus far!
Looking forward to next week.
- PyreneesPie
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has liked: 66 times
- mudlark
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 8:01 pm
- Location: Maroochydore Qld
- Contact:
Darcy Moore played quite probably, his worst game for Collingwood and Madgen just shouldn't play again,.he seems clueless on what to do and where to go. Time to bring in Will Kelly and let him develop in the back 6.In the last quarter, Crisp dashed around and then coughed the ball up on 3 occasions ,once by foot to a 2 on 1 on our forward flank, the 2 won out and kicked a goal soon after and one of his shocking handballs back into a pack rather than to an outside runner was another goal straight after. Why didn't Elliot take more time with that shite round the corner attempt which would have put us back in front with about 3minutes to go?/ That goal they easily allowed late in the 3rd qtr caused more harm than most realise and it was far too easy. I'm pleased at what we CAN do and the kids were simply out muscled by the seasoned ,but aging Geelong. Hopefully, we learn from that and someone mentioned a forward. Ash Johnston MUST come in and stay there. Cameron, even though he took a couple of strong marks and goals, is just too slow and cumbersome. Johnson can run jump and kick and has genuine pace. It's time.
- PyreneesPie
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has liked: 66 times
- Cam
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Springvale
- Has liked: 19 times
- Been liked: 28 times
This is a worry because we have heard those lines before from Bucks.Magpietothemax wrote:^ This reflects pretty much what Fly said in his presser. He said that our gamestyle is now very taxing energy wise, and we need to learn how to manage our energy expenditure so that it can be sustained across 4 quarters. That means in between Plan A (maximum energy expenditure) we need Plan B ("economy gear") in order to cut a balance across 4 quarters.
Get back on top.
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 27 times
- Been liked: 31 times
^if so, definitely not in the same context.Cam wrote:This is a worry because we have heard those lines before from Bucks.Magpietothemax wrote:^ This reflects pretty much what Fly said in his presser. He said that our gamestyle is now very taxing energy wise, and we need to learn how to manage our energy expenditure so that it can be sustained across 4 quarters. That means in between Plan A (maximum energy expenditure) we need Plan B ("economy gear") in order to cut a balance across 4 quarters.
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Ice in the veins
- think better
- Posts: 3114
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 4:42 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 40 times