Cool, he can have the bye offBazBoy wrote:De Goey offered a one week ban for rough conduct on Oliver
Post Match. Pies win for Bucks. All comments, please.
Moderator: bbmods
- Rd10.1998_11.1#36
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
- Location: Sevilla, Spain
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 5 times
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2020 4:10 pm
This without Adams and even Grundy is very impressive.Pies4shaw wrote:Collingwood won the clearances by 10, 34 to 24. They won centre clearances 14 to 9 (and I think they won 4 of the 5 in the last quarter) and stoppage clearances 20 to 15.
Clearances - De Goey 6, Crisp, Pendlebury and Sidebottom 5, Daicos 3.
Centre clearances - De Goey 5, Sidebottom 3, Pendlebury 2 and 5 others 1 each.
We played fantastically, Pendles was great, best game this year for him, the same to De Goey, a shame that he could miss next game, hopefully they can continue on this form, especially De Goey. Maynard had his best game for the season which has still been a good one for him, he has been a reliable lockdown defender for us this year but he was really damaging today offensively. The future is exciting and we still need to add Nick Daicos to this young core.
Just to add, great game from Lynch. My perspective on him has done a complete 180 turn. I thought he should have been delisted last year, and even dropped for this match, but he showed that he has some talent as a tap ruckman, which is really the only flaw in Grundy's game. We should keep him and trade Cox this trade period I think.
"That was out-of-bounds"
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
- Has liked: 74 times
- Been liked: 57 times
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2020 5:27 pm
- Been liked: 1 time
De Goey ran passed the ball deliberately to take out the player with a hip an shoulder. De Goey hit him with significant force. Sorry but generally any player that does that these days will get suspended.slangman wrote: Can’t see why De Goey was given a week.
I think this is an open and shut case and it will be pointless appealing.
The interesting case will be the Mckay case.
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20136
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 35 times
CorrectSwanny2011 wrote:De Goey ran passed the ball deliberately to take out the player with a hip an shoulder. De Goey hit him with significant force. Sorry but generally any player that does that these days will get suspended.slangman wrote: Can’t see why De Goey was given a week.
I think this is an open and shut case and it will be pointless appealing.
The interesting case will be the Mckay case.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 2032
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2020 1:49 pm
But even the slightest of contact, given the aggressive go past the ball nature of the bump, was going to get a week....as for its effect, have a look at old mates face when he gets up, absolutely shat himself, and was hearing footsteps for the rest of the game....well worth a weekKenH wrote:Have another look at it Ronnie, I really don't think he connected?Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:Disagree Ken, thats as hard as you can get a bloke for a week nowadays
- i hate carlton
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 8:42 pm
- Has liked: 21 times
- Been liked: 13 times
Disgraceful decision - the club should appeal.
___________________
He's kicking pineapples!
My favourite nicks thread (Laugh at Carlscum): http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopi ... sc&start=0
He's kicking pineapples!
My favourite nicks thread (Laugh at Carlscum): http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopi ... sc&start=0
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
- Rd10.1998_11.1#36
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:04 pm
- Location: Sevilla, Spain
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 5 times