Pre-Match: Collingwood V Dorkers - All comments here
Moderator: bbmods
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
- The Prototype
- Posts: 19193
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
- Location: Hobart, Tasmania
So maybe Didak(FP) Rocca(FF) Fraser(FP) thenJLC wrote:If Walker plays full forward i wont hold my breath for us winning.
The forward line needs to consist of Fraser and Rocca along with Dids. Walker is too easily put out of a contest whereas Pebbles and Fraser give second and third efforts.
Lokan and maybe Williams could provide a useful third option along with Guy Richards.
jlc
Williams, Clement, Walker.
Maybe even switch Rocca with Clement during the game.
-
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:51 pm
Is it wise to put Jimmy up forward? Presti needs to run into some good form, and Wakes may not even play - even if he did play he might be hampered by that facial injury.
But then again Freo dont have a really big go to man in their forward line, the real dangers. I guess Longmuir, medhurst and farmer will be their focal points.
If Jimmy is put forward, that may leave us with even more problems.... but if we are struggling for goals on the day we might not have much of a choice.
I'd rather see Josh and centre half forward, Pebbles at Full forward, Dids crumbing around the half forward line, and Williams to hopefully provide a contest and help Pebbles out.
But then again Freo dont have a really big go to man in their forward line, the real dangers. I guess Longmuir, medhurst and farmer will be their focal points.
If Jimmy is put forward, that may leave us with even more problems.... but if we are struggling for goals on the day we might not have much of a choice.
I'd rather see Josh and centre half forward, Pebbles at Full forward, Dids crumbing around the half forward line, and Williams to hopefully provide a contest and help Pebbles out.
- peter_pies4ever
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- The Prototype
- Posts: 19193
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
- Location: Hobart, Tasmania
-
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: back home after travelling around Australia
- Contact:
- Cakewalk
- Posts: 1528
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 1:57 pm
- Location: Australia
- Daks
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:57 pm
- Location: Melbourne.
- Contact:
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
- The Prototype
- Posts: 19193
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:54 pm
- Location: Hobart, Tasmania
-
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:51 pm
Why isnt McGough in the team more regularly? Is it because he's not accountable enough? Or is it lack of one percenters in his game? Or is it kicking skills?
It seems as if he isnt given as many chances as some other players, where its quite obvious he has the talent. I mean if its kicking skills, half of our team at the moment kick just as badly as him.
It seems as if he isnt given as many chances as some other players, where its quite obvious he has the talent. I mean if its kicking skills, half of our team at the moment kick just as badly as him.