Chad Wingard

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Big T
Posts: 10228
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 1:31 am
Location: Torino, Italy
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 82 times

Chad Wingard

Post by Big T »

Needs to have a good hard look at himself. Massively overated. Costly errors tonight.
Buon Giorno
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Maybe they'd swap him for Mayne?
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Butchered the ball in a space of a minute when the game was on the line.
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

So happy these flogs lost to WCE.
Wingard, Wines, Grey etc think they can bludge their way through 90% of a final then kick their usual arsey goals and be sudden death heroes again.
FAIL!! Good to see Dixon choke it up in extra time. FAIL!
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
woodys_world69
Posts: 2230
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Brisbane
Been liked: 34 times

Post by woodys_world69 »

that free kick at the end was definitely not a free kick by the letter of the law.

Will the decision get reversed? like sirengate?
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

woodys_world69 wrote:that free kick at the end was definitely not a free kick by the letter of the law.

Will the decision get reversed? like sirengate?
They missed 43 other West Coast frees during the game, so it probably ended as it should have.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

Port were lucky to be paid a goal earlier in the match courtesy of Wingard.

http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/did-po ... 46919e9a47
πŸ† | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | πŸ†
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

Pies4shaw wrote:
woodys_world69 wrote:that free kick at the end was definitely not a free kick by the letter of the law.

Will the decision get reversed? like sirengate?
They missed 43 other West Coast frees during the game, so it probably ended as it should have.
That was my count too - WCE got the same sort of rogering over there like we did some weeks back. The away team's frees just get ignored.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
Post Reply