Agree completely. Your mates are good judges.Bucks2014 wrote:This, I watched it with a few mates and most of us thought Boyd was the best player, took some very important contested marks, kicks 3 and rucked well. Anyway the winner is announced and we went WTF.bally12 wrote:I learnt the Norm Smith voting is a joke.
Boyd was clearly the most influential player in the Doggies' win, and deserved to win it. Kennedy was awesome for the Swans. I'd also have Picken and Bont in the discussion and ahead of Johannisen. In fact Johannisen butchered everything he touched in the first half.
Hardly surprising to see who the judges were and which ones didn't rate Boyd:
Brad Johnson - too closely connected emotionally to the Dogs to be a judge.
Jay Clarke - typical Herald Sun flog reporter..cannot take him seriously. Just watch the Pies website after-match analysis with Chrisso and you'll see he's not a serious football analyst.
Michael Voss - never impressed me as an analyst, and suspect he's a bit twisted and not fair and balanced.
For what it's worth, Wayne Carey and Emma Qualye both had Boyd as bog.
The only other player considered for me was Picken.
Lessons from the GF
Moderator: bbmods
- Greening gold
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:22 am
- Location: Narooma - NSW South Coast
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 1 time
If you used to barrack for the 'Pies, you never barracked for the 'Pies.
- schuey07
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 5:01 pm
- Location: Mount Waverley
+1 Great post.Morrigu wrote:Yeah me too Stui. I guess being a lover of a narcissistic grisly no talent scrag takes it toll and makes you bitter and twisted like it is.stui magpie wrote:Really?ANNODAM wrote:Bevo handed his medal to Murphy, what a dick head!
Sugar-coat it all you like but the medal ain't his, Murphy hasn't played a game since June...
So suffer you ugly mofo, you get the pretend medal, LOL!
That's what I learnt!
So much hate in such a little person.
I thought it was a brilliant touch.
I am absolutely thrilled for the dogs - firstly because the people I met there the trainers particularly ( blokes who were tradies, overweight, loved a beer and were unpaid ) when my ex hubby played VFL were the best and have been life long friends.
Secondly cause I love watching them play - fast and exciting and brave! ( Don't take Cloke you will be sorry!!!!!)
Thirdly because the health service I work in is in the West and they are incredible with their time and Bob Murphy is one of the best human beings you could meet.
And yep they may well have got some concessions and assistance from the AFL BUT not as much as the interstate clubs got and not as much as we as a club generated - but they used it wisely ( mind you apparently we have a netball team) recruited well and won the 2016 flag!! Well done dogs
- MagpieBat
- Posts: 17846
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:05 pm
- Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
Were you aiming that at me? Because I loved Beveridge's gesture.Coxie29 wrote:Seriously, have you ever been part of a team. I saw it and my comment to my mates was I'd bleed for this bloke. Hence why they've won the premiership.MagpieBat wrote:So much salt. Why?ANNODAM wrote:Bevo handed his medal to Murphy, what a dick head!
Sugar-coat it all you like but the medal ain't his, Murphy hasn't played a game since June...
So suffer you ugly mofo, you get the pretend medal, LOL!
That's what I learnt!
I am vengeance. I am the night. I am MagpieBat.
- CarringbushCigar
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: wherever I lay my beanie
- Has liked: 6 times
- Been liked: 7 times
This is killing me - Boyd was my number 1 bet for the Norm Smith (@ 180-1), and would have recovered all my Collingwood losses for the year.Greening gold wrote:Agree completely. Your mates are good judges.Bucks2014 wrote:This, I watched it with a few mates and most of us thought Boyd was the best player, took some very important contested marks, kicks 3 and rucked well. Anyway the winner is announced and we went WTF.bally12 wrote:I learnt the Norm Smith voting is a joke.
Boyd was clearly the most influential player in the Doggies' win, and deserved to win it. Kennedy was awesome for the Swans. I'd also have Picken and Bont in the discussion and ahead of Johannisen. In fact Johannisen butchered everything he touched in the first half.
Hardly surprising to see who the judges were and which ones didn't rate Boyd:
Brad Johnson - too closely connected emotionally to the Dogs to be a judge.
Jay Clarke - typical Herald Sun flog reporter..cannot take him seriously. Just watch the Pies website after-match analysis with Chrisso and you'll see he's not a serious football analyst.
Michael Voss - never impressed me as an analyst, and suspect he's a bit twisted and not fair and balanced.
For what it's worth, Wayne Carey and Emma Qualye both had Boyd as bog.
The only other player considered for me was Picken.
Watching the live Norm Smith betting markets in the last half - me thinks there was some dodgy activity going on.
Im calling on the AFL integrity department to investigate and redistribute the medal to the rightful owner and arrest Johnson, Voss and Clark.
How the judges voted
Brad Johnson (Fox Footy): Johannisen 3, Kennedy 2, Boyd 1.
Emma Quayle (The Age): Boyd 3, Johannisen 2, Kennedy 1.
Wayne Carey (Channel 7): Boyd 3, Picken 2, Kennedy 1.
Michael Voss (SEN 1116): Johannisen 3, Picken 2, Kennedy 1.
Jay Clark (Herald Sun): Kennedy 3, Johannisen 2, Picken 1.
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
Man .. that's a stake to the heart! Hubby just suggested we pop down to the kennel today, I think he's having a lend of me but I still filled the swear jar. Although I wish he would go, I'd love a peaceful day avoiding all mediaPies4shaw wrote:The lesson? When you get there, just win.
Imagine having almost an entire supporter base that doesn't know what it feels like to watch your team die pathetically in a ditch on Grand Final day.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- Rush Stand Wing
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 5:44 pm
I learned...
Contested ball is still king - Hawthorn's demise and the Dogs/Swans GF is concrete proof. This is already our mantra and we must maintain it consistently
Mobile Forwards are preferred - the game is much faster and relies heavily on players finding 'space' more so than big key position marking players who are more likely to cause congestion, if a mark is not taken. However, this will turn back again at some stage because big men will always get bigger the longer the game goes on.
Keep ball moving at forward all costs - Basically, back in your mates and go 'hell for leather' but yet be prepared to block it from going the other way. Every second and inch counts. The 'transition' game style is already entrenched at the Pies but we need the group to really click.
Never give a sucker and even break - the Dogs were to be admired the way they took most goal scoring chances when they presented. Its definitely a confidence thing and they peaked at the perfect time. A build up of self belief would go down very well at the Pies.
The Club's media need to go into lockdown - Instead of fuelling the media machine we need to close ranks and give the group more space to let their true personalities come out. We need some mystique back at the club.
We are on the right trek and its not as far away as I thought.
Contested ball is still king - Hawthorn's demise and the Dogs/Swans GF is concrete proof. This is already our mantra and we must maintain it consistently
Mobile Forwards are preferred - the game is much faster and relies heavily on players finding 'space' more so than big key position marking players who are more likely to cause congestion, if a mark is not taken. However, this will turn back again at some stage because big men will always get bigger the longer the game goes on.
Keep ball moving at forward all costs - Basically, back in your mates and go 'hell for leather' but yet be prepared to block it from going the other way. Every second and inch counts. The 'transition' game style is already entrenched at the Pies but we need the group to really click.
Never give a sucker and even break - the Dogs were to be admired the way they took most goal scoring chances when they presented. Its definitely a confidence thing and they peaked at the perfect time. A build up of self belief would go down very well at the Pies.
The Club's media need to go into lockdown - Instead of fuelling the media machine we need to close ranks and give the group more space to let their true personalities come out. We need some mystique back at the club.
We are on the right trek and its not as far away as I thought.
-
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:27 am
- Rush Stand Wing
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 5:44 pm
- WarrenerraW
- Posts: 5146
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:25 am
- Location: Melbourne
annodam, what a nasty thing to say, you should be ashamed of yourself. I know you hate the bulldogs but do you need to be so juvenile and petulant.ANNODAM wrote:Bevo handed his medal to Murphy, what a dick head!
Sugar-coat it all you like but the medal ain't his, Murphy hasn't played a game since June...
So suffer you ugly mofo, you get the pretend medal, LOL!
That's what I learnt!
I thought it was a heartwarming gesture and an act of respect and admiration for someone who has stuck with his club through thick and thin and was just as much a part of the win as any of the 22 blokes that took the field.
It also shows how much Bevo values his players.
The main lesson I got from the Dogs win was that there is no set template, game-plan or style for winning a flag. Those who try to emulate others are doomed to be second rate. Each team has its own strengths, its own personnel, it's own skill-sets and character. The key is to harness the best of what you've got and play to your strengths. However, the only other thing I'd add is that in doing that I do believe its essential to have a fully united and committed team, full of team spirit and passion. The Dogs have that in spades. This is the one area of Bucks coaching style which worries me, when I hear him saying he expects the players to be self motivated. To a point he's right. However, the team culture and spirit - as opposed to individual motivation - is the responsibility of the coach to nurture. FWIW, I think Bucks is smart enough to realise that, and getting rid of Leading Teams is a good step towards rebuilding the team spirit we need to march on to victory in 2017.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Unless they've changed the process, the people judging the Norm Smith had to hand in their votes at the 10 minute mark of the last quarter.CarringbushCigar wrote:This is killing me - Boyd was my number 1 bet for the Norm Smith (@ 180-1), and would have recovered all my Collingwood losses for the year.Greening gold wrote:Agree completely. Your mates are good judges.Bucks2014 wrote: This, I watched it with a few mates and most of us thought Boyd was the best player, took some very important contested marks, kicks 3 and rucked well. Anyway the winner is announced and we went WTF.
The only other player considered for me was Picken.
Watching the live Norm Smith betting markets in the last half - me thinks there was some dodgy activity going on.
Im calling on the AFL integrity department to investigate and redistribute the medal to the rightful owner and arrest Johnson, Voss and Clark.
How the judges voted
Brad Johnson (Fox Footy): Johannisen 3, Kennedy 2, Boyd 1.
Emma Quayle (The Age): Boyd 3, Johannisen 2, Kennedy 1.
Wayne Carey (Channel 7): Boyd 3, Picken 2, Kennedy 1.
Michael Voss (SEN 1116): Johannisen 3, Picken 2, Kennedy 1.
Jay Clark (Herald Sun): Kennedy 3, Johannisen 2, Picken 1.
Jay Clark was obviously either drunk or too busy writing a column to watch the game.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.