Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Suggestions, praise, feedback. Need to communicate with the moderators? This is the place. If you need to communicate privately with the moderators, send email to lesbastardssinistres(at)magpies.net

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Redlight
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:15 pm

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by Redlight »

Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
Dave, I've seen a lot of your posts over the years, and I've seen enough to know you are a fair-dinkum Collingwood die-hard and I certainly don't count you amongst those I would consider as 'trolls'.

However I'm not a fan of those 'supporters' who only ever have negative things to say, those who are silent when we perform well, but who scramble to post, endlessly, as soon as things go bad.

I'm not a fan of those who claim insight and knowledge that they don't possess, those unwashed clowns who would denigrate McGuire and Buckley, Burns and Pert as if they've contributed nothing to the Magpies.

Those random internet posters who get a membership on Nick's and then spend all their time telling us how s&*t Collingwood is, how 'ashamed' they are to be supporters, how Buckley is a pea-heart and McGuire a big-mouthed embarrassment.

Well, the only embarrassments here are those self-loathing nobodies, and if they sound, look, smell and act like anti-Collingwood trolls, then why should we treat them as anything else?
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by jackcass »

Redlight wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
Dave, I've seen a lot of your posts over the years, and I've seen enough to know you are a fair-dinkum Collingwood die-hard and I certainly don't count you amongst those I would consider as 'trolls'.

However I'm not a fan of those 'supporters' who only ever have negative things to say, those who are silent when we perform well, but who scramble to post, endlessly, as soon as things go bad.

I'm not a fan of those who claim insight and knowledge that they don't possess, those unwashed clowns who would denigrate McGuire and Buckley, Burns and Pert as if they've contributed nothing to the Magpies.

Those random internet posters who get a membership on Nick's and then spend all their time telling us how s&*t Collingwood is, how 'ashamed' they are to be supporters, how Buckley is a pea-heart and McGuire a big-mouthed embarrassment.

Well, the only embarrassments here are those self-loathing nobodies, and if they sound, look, smell and act like anti-Collingwood trolls, then why should we treat them as anything else?
Hear, hear!
E

Post by E »

Dave The Man wrote:
Jez07 wrote:They embody why Collingwood as a club not openly embraces medricotiy but laps it up. It's no shock that we've won 2 flags in 50 odd years with a supporter and member base that embraces failure.
Lot of People on here like Failure as they seem Content with it
No, i just think people disagree with your conclusions sometimes as to the cause. If you post a positive or negative post, you are expressing a strong opinion. someone who disagrees with you should be entitled to say so.

I dont like how we are travelling. I have my thoughts as to why we find ourselves where we find ourselves.

Some of the shit that has been posted on this site is just laughable and occasionally i find the enrgy to let those people know.

Dave, you are passionate (and for the most part you have sensible thoughts about what is happening at Collingwood), but sometimes you shoot from the hip without thinking very much which means you say some silly things in the heat of the moment. That is why i think some posters lay into you. If you are going to make outlandish statements, you have to be prepared for the heat that follows.

I guarantee you though. If you say endlessly positive things about the club, you will be persecuted much more on this site than you will be for being negative. Try it for a laugh sometime. You will not be disappointed.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by John Wren »

Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
dave, i know who i am. i sent you a private message asking why you needed to post comments like your "blow jobs" one and said that you do not always need to be so negative when things aren't going so well. it was not abuse. it was nothing more than what i say to you in person when we chat. i did that out of respect to you because you once asked me not to do these things in public yet you chose to make things public. i afford you a lot of time to help you understand but no longer.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Cuthbert Collingwood
Posts: 5186
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:53 am
Location: The BBC (Brunswick Bowling Club)

Post by Cuthbert Collingwood »

You've really gone to the dark side haven't you Dave?

Are you being secretly "coached" by the ghost of jack_spain?
McRae for Governor-General!
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34888
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by Pies4shaw »

John Wren wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
dave, i know who i am. i sent you a private message asking why you needed to post comments like your "blow jobs" one and said that you do not always need to be so negative when things aren't going so well. it was not abuse. it was nothing more than what i say to you in person when we chat. i did that out of respect to you because you once asked me not to do these things in public yet you chose to make things public. i afford you a lot of time to help you understand but no longer.
Oh, JW - you yellow-bellied sapsucker, you!
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

^ ring the waaambulance. i'm hurt. you called me a name. waaaaa. waaaa. waaaa. :lol:
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by thompsoc »

Cuthbert Collingwood wrote:You've really gone to the dark side haven't you Dave?

Are you being secretly "coached" by the ghost of jack_spain?
Another crap post by the spritual leader of the lemming society.
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
thompsoc
Posts: 6357
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:28 pm

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by thompsoc »

Redlight wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
Dave, I've seen a lot of your posts over the years, and I've seen enough to know you are a fair-dinkum Collingwood die-hard and I certainly don't count you amongst those I would consider as 'trolls'.

However I'm not a fan of those 'supporters' who only ever have negative things to say, those who are silent when we perform well, but who scramble to post, endlessly, as soon as things go bad.

I'm not a fan of those who claim insight and knowledge that they don't possess, those unwashed clowns who would denigrate McGuire and Buckley, Burns and Pert as if they've contributed nothing to the Magpies.

Those random internet posters who get a membership on Nick's and then spend all their time telling us how s&*t Collingwood is, how 'ashamed' they are to be supporters, how Buckley is a pea-heart and McGuire a big-mouthed embarrassment.

Well, the only embarrassments here are those self-loathing nobodies, and if they sound, look, smell and act like anti-Collingwood trolls, then why should we treat them as anything else?
Well, the only embarrassments here are those self-sucking nobodies, and if they sound, look, smell and act like sycophant Collingwood nodding dolls, then why should we treat them as anything else?
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
User avatar
Redlight
Posts: 1801
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:15 pm

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by Redlight »

thompsoc wrote:
Redlight wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
Dave, I've seen a lot of your posts over the years, and I've seen enough to know you are a fair-dinkum Collingwood die-hard and I certainly don't count you amongst those I would consider as 'trolls'.

However I'm not a fan of those 'supporters' who only ever have negative things to say, those who are silent when we perform well, but who scramble to post, endlessly, as soon as things go bad.

I'm not a fan of those who claim insight and knowledge that they don't possess, those unwashed clowns who would denigrate McGuire and Buckley, Burns and Pert as if they've contributed nothing to the Magpies.

Those random internet posters who get a membership on Nick's and then spend all their time telling us how s&*t Collingwood is, how 'ashamed' they are to be supporters, how Buckley is a pea-heart and McGuire a big-mouthed embarrassment.

Well, the only embarrassments here are those self-loathing nobodies, and if they sound, look, smell and act like anti-Collingwood trolls, then why should we treat them as anything else?
Well, the only embarrassments here are those self-sucking nobodies, and if they sound, look, smell and act like sycophant Collingwood nodding dolls, then why should we treat them as anything else?
Well, that's certainly more efficient than writing your own sentences.

As an aside, I'm not sure if 'self-sucking' is an insult or an expression of admiration.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 22 times
Contact:

Re: Hate posters who abuse negative posts

Post by Dave The Man »

John Wren wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:I am not going to name anyone here but You know how you are.

But people here who say Negative Things is because they want the Best for the Club.

I hate when other Members Abuse them and Call them not Collingwood Fans.

I find people who do that are very Pathetic
dave, i know who i am. i sent you a private message asking why you needed to post comments like your "blow jobs" one and said that you do not always need to be so negative when things aren't going so well. it was not abuse. it was nothing more than what i say to you in person when we chat. i did that out of respect to you because you once asked me not to do these things in public yet you chose to make things public. i afford you a lot of time to help you understand but no longer.

Well F**k You.

We all can't work at the Club like you do
I am Da Man
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

you weak little individual. i have been more than fair to you and the way i have treated you but you simply are too stupid to know any different. clearly you cannot be trusted.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 22 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

ksfjkl;asgmasg'
sd
Gsd
Gsd
G
sdGsd
Gsd
Gsd
G
I am Da Man
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

This thread has lost the plot :shock:

Back to the original point of the thread, forums like this are always volatile especially during times of crisis or evident struggles such as what the club is experiencing at the moment so sometimes it can be hard to be motivated to join in the discussion when there's a clear fracture and divide within the forum itself.

You have to take the good with the bad with a forum like this if you're going to be a long-term poster. I think there can be moments when it becomes inundated by mindless drivel from both sides, whether you're an eternal optimist or someone who's constantly negative and never has anything good to say about the club, but all in all I find all perspectives and opinions even if I don't necessarily agree with them refreshing, honest and open-minded and I'm always wanting to hear what fellow supporters think of the current workings of the club (on and off-field).

I don't want to sound harsh Dave, but as you soon post something on Nicks or any other forum for that matter, you're always going to be open to criticism or praise or even a level of indifference but you just need to try and handle it the best way you can.

The best way to do this is to either ignore someone's response if you don't want to respond at all or you can sensibly debate and discuss the issues surrounding Collingwood without resorting to verbal abuse even if the other side is playing the man rather than the ball so to speak.

We can only hope this place calms down and becomes a little more peaceful soon enough.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45002
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 22 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Jezza wrote:This thread has lost the plot :shock:

Back to the original point of the thread, forums like this are always volatile especially during times of crisis or evident struggles such as what the club is experiencing at the moment so sometimes it can be hard to be motivated to join in the discussion when there's a clear fracture and divide within the forum itself.

You have to take the good with the bad with a forum like this if you're going to be a long-term poster. I think there can be moments when it becomes inundated by mindless drivel from both sides, whether you're an eternal optimist or someone who's constantly negative and never has anything good to say about the club, but all in all I find all perspectives and opinions even if I don't necessarily agree with them refreshing, honest and open-minded and I'm always wanting to hear what fellow supporters think of the current workings of the club (on and off-field).

I don't want to sound harsh Dave, but as you soon post something on Nicks or any other forum for that matter, you're always going to be open to criticism or praise or even a level of indifference but you just need to try and handle it the best way you can.

The best way to do this is to either ignore someone's response if you don't want to respond at all or you can sensibly debate and discuss the issues surrounding Collingwood without resorting to verbal abuse even if the other side is playing the man rather than the ball so to speak.

We can only hope this place calms down and becomes a little more peaceful soon enough.
There is a Huge Divide on here Between the Pro-Bucks and Sack-Bucks Members

I don't mind people Disagreeing with People's Post but it seems lately it also comes with a Pot Shot as well. Not Every post but a Fair Few
I am Da Man
Post Reply