Amazing watching Dyson Heppell on 360. He actually believes he's still innocent. Mentioning "disbelief" about the decision. "Injustice, we know what we took and it was all documented."
FFS, who is advising these people???? Or is he just an imbecile???
Still deluded
Moderator: bbmods
- jg22
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:56 pm
Still deluded
Explain it to me like I'm a four year old. Ted Whitten is an AFL legend, and Bob Rose isn't?
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
- Woods Of Ypres
- Posts: 3141
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 3:29 pm
- Location: Yugoslavia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 7 times
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
I get the feeling Heppell is toeing the company line but it's strange that he can make assertions that he's confident of what he's taken and that it's documented. If this was true then why wasn't this reflected in ASADA and WADA's findings into the supplements program.
The only person who can say with some certainty what the players were ingested with is Stephen Dank and there's no indication he's going to implicate himself any further even if it leaves the players affected uncertain on what they may have taken. Whether the club knows or not is unclear but this isn't over by a long shot.
As Ben McDevitt from ASADA said, the players at best were complicit in this program because they didn't ask the necessary questions to the club and they were willing to trust the club on these matters even though the onus is always on the player himself to be responsible for what he takes. This is based on the assumption that the players were really guinea pigs and had no knowledge or foresight into what the supplements program really entailed.
I watched the Four Corners program the other night and I don't think it told us anything that we didn't know already but it was certainly refreshing to see a player actually voice his concerns and show an element of visible anger and distress from this situation. It was a real eye opener to hear how low Essendon can go by forcing Hunter to pay the club's legal fees at one stage.
If other posters haven't seen the interviews of Heppell and Hunter already, here are the links below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gAmWRXoHM - Dyson Heppell on AFL 360.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYBrpiqDtQY - Hal Hunter on Four Corners.
The only person who can say with some certainty what the players were ingested with is Stephen Dank and there's no indication he's going to implicate himself any further even if it leaves the players affected uncertain on what they may have taken. Whether the club knows or not is unclear but this isn't over by a long shot.
As Ben McDevitt from ASADA said, the players at best were complicit in this program because they didn't ask the necessary questions to the club and they were willing to trust the club on these matters even though the onus is always on the player himself to be responsible for what he takes. This is based on the assumption that the players were really guinea pigs and had no knowledge or foresight into what the supplements program really entailed.
I watched the Four Corners program the other night and I don't think it told us anything that we didn't know already but it was certainly refreshing to see a player actually voice his concerns and show an element of visible anger and distress from this situation. It was a real eye opener to hear how low Essendon can go by forcing Hunter to pay the club's legal fees at one stage.
If other posters haven't seen the interviews of Heppell and Hunter already, here are the links below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gAmWRXoHM - Dyson Heppell on AFL 360.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYBrpiqDtQY - Hal Hunter on Four Corners.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |