Hayden - Simply the Best
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
Hayden leaves Lara in his wake
Lynn McConnell - October 10, 2003
Matthew Hayden once said the stimulation he received from hitting a cricket ball - and hitting it well - would never wane. Zimbabwe found that out the hard way today as Hayden put every other Test match batting record in the shade en route to an unforgettable 380. The day revolved around his remarkable achievement to such an extent that it was almost forgotten that Australia amassed 735 for 6, the highest total in 126 years of cricket on Australian soil, before taking pity on Zimbabwe's bowlers.
To their credit, Zimbabwe made a brave fist of it in the final session, reaching 61 before Jason Gillespie blasted a ball through Dion Ebrahim's defence to bowl him for 29. By stumps, there were 79 for one wicket, still a small ocean short of the 536 needed to avoid the follow-on.
But whatever be your perspective, this was Hayden's day, as he once again revealed the hunger of the late starter. Not only did he surpass the 375 scored by Brian Lara against England at Antigua in 1993-94, but he became only the second Australian to score a triple century on home soil - something beyond even a certain Donald George Bradman. His energy levels never ebbed, and 400 was a distinct possibility - especially after Steve Waugh decided to let the batsmen come back out after tea - when he pulled a ball from Trevor Gripper to backward square leg, where Stuart Carlisle took a low tumbling catch.
The record was just reward for a batsman who has been the outstanding performer of the 21st century, and with four Tests still to play in the calendar year, Hayden finds himself well within reach of 1000 runs - he has 837 after this epic - in a year for the third successive time.
The straight drive proved a reliable, and punishing, weapon throughout his innings. There were also flashing cuts and disdainful pulls aplenty. With the attack enfeebled to such an extent that they appeared to be on some mediocre auto-pilot, Hayden was also more inclined to loft the ball straight. He ended his innings having struck 11 sixes, one short of equalling Wasim Akram's world record.
Hayden's inexorable progress past successive milestones meant that Adam Gilchrist's truly remarkable cameo - if you can call a century that - was relegated to the shade. He finished with 113 not out - his ninth Test century - perhaps the only time in the history of the game that an 84-ball hundred has had to play second fiddle. Gilchrist did manage some crumbs of comfort from the record-breaking table, as both batsmen made over a hundred runs between lunch and tea.
Hayden, who had also scored a century between tea and stumps yesterday, joined Walter Hammond - who achieved the feat against New Zealand at Auckland in 1932-33 - as the only man to do that twice in the same innings.
Sean Ervine may have achieved his career-best figures with four wickets, but they came at a cost of 146 runs. Gripper, who dropped Hayden at midwicket, when he offered his only chance at 335, finished with 2 for 142, as five bowlers went for over 100 runs.
The only thing that Zimbabwe managed to do right was to deny Steve Waugh the unique honour of having scored a hundred at each of Australia's contemporary Test grounds. Waugh had been untroubled on his way to 78, but Sean Ervine got one to catch the inside edge and rebound high into the air off the pad, following up well enough to snaffle a difficult chance.
The rest of the day was all about one man's tryst with history. Hayden has often professed to a fondness for fly-fishing, and today, the bait he used snared the biggest fish of them all. Goodbye Brian Lara, hello Matthew Hayden - king of the batting mountain.
Lynn McConnell - October 10, 2003
Matthew Hayden once said the stimulation he received from hitting a cricket ball - and hitting it well - would never wane. Zimbabwe found that out the hard way today as Hayden put every other Test match batting record in the shade en route to an unforgettable 380. The day revolved around his remarkable achievement to such an extent that it was almost forgotten that Australia amassed 735 for 6, the highest total in 126 years of cricket on Australian soil, before taking pity on Zimbabwe's bowlers.
To their credit, Zimbabwe made a brave fist of it in the final session, reaching 61 before Jason Gillespie blasted a ball through Dion Ebrahim's defence to bowl him for 29. By stumps, there were 79 for one wicket, still a small ocean short of the 536 needed to avoid the follow-on.
But whatever be your perspective, this was Hayden's day, as he once again revealed the hunger of the late starter. Not only did he surpass the 375 scored by Brian Lara against England at Antigua in 1993-94, but he became only the second Australian to score a triple century on home soil - something beyond even a certain Donald George Bradman. His energy levels never ebbed, and 400 was a distinct possibility - especially after Steve Waugh decided to let the batsmen come back out after tea - when he pulled a ball from Trevor Gripper to backward square leg, where Stuart Carlisle took a low tumbling catch.
The record was just reward for a batsman who has been the outstanding performer of the 21st century, and with four Tests still to play in the calendar year, Hayden finds himself well within reach of 1000 runs - he has 837 after this epic - in a year for the third successive time.
The straight drive proved a reliable, and punishing, weapon throughout his innings. There were also flashing cuts and disdainful pulls aplenty. With the attack enfeebled to such an extent that they appeared to be on some mediocre auto-pilot, Hayden was also more inclined to loft the ball straight. He ended his innings having struck 11 sixes, one short of equalling Wasim Akram's world record.
Hayden's inexorable progress past successive milestones meant that Adam Gilchrist's truly remarkable cameo - if you can call a century that - was relegated to the shade. He finished with 113 not out - his ninth Test century - perhaps the only time in the history of the game that an 84-ball hundred has had to play second fiddle. Gilchrist did manage some crumbs of comfort from the record-breaking table, as both batsmen made over a hundred runs between lunch and tea.
Hayden, who had also scored a century between tea and stumps yesterday, joined Walter Hammond - who achieved the feat against New Zealand at Auckland in 1932-33 - as the only man to do that twice in the same innings.
Sean Ervine may have achieved his career-best figures with four wickets, but they came at a cost of 146 runs. Gripper, who dropped Hayden at midwicket, when he offered his only chance at 335, finished with 2 for 142, as five bowlers went for over 100 runs.
The only thing that Zimbabwe managed to do right was to deny Steve Waugh the unique honour of having scored a hundred at each of Australia's contemporary Test grounds. Waugh had been untroubled on his way to 78, but Sean Ervine got one to catch the inside edge and rebound high into the air off the pad, following up well enough to snaffle a difficult chance.
The rest of the day was all about one man's tryst with history. Hayden has often professed to a fondness for fly-fishing, and today, the bait he used snared the biggest fish of them all. Goodbye Brian Lara, hello Matthew Hayden - king of the batting mountain.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
380 ML Hayden Australia v Zimbabwe at Perth, 1st Test, 2003/04 [1661]
375 BC Lara West Indies v England at St John's, 5th Test, 1993/94 [1259]
365* GS Sobers West Indies v Pakistan at Kingston, 3rd Test, 1957/58 [450]
364 L Hutton England v Australia at The Oval, 5th Test, 1938 [266]
340 ST Jayasuriya Sri Lanka v India at Colombo (RPS), 1st Test, 1997/98 [1374]
337 Hanif Mohammad Pakistan v West Indies at Bridgetown, 1st Test, 1957/58 [446]
336* WR Hammond England v New Zealand at Auckland, 2nd Test, 1932/33 [226]
334* MA Taylor Australia v Pakistan at Peshawar, 2nd Test, 1998/99 [1426]
334 DG Bradman Australia v England at Leeds, 3rd Test, 1930 [196]
333 GA Gooch England v India at Lord's, 1st Test, 1990 [1148]
329 Inzamam-ul-Haq Pakistan v New Zealand at Lahore, 1st Test, 2002 [1600]
325 A Sandham England v West Indies at Kingston, 4th Test, 1929/30 [193]
311 RB Simpson Australia v England at Manchester, 4th Test, 1964 [564]
310* JH Edrich England v New Zealand at Leeds, 3rd Test, 1965 [593]
307 RM Cowper Australia v England at Melbourne, 5th Test, 1965/66 [601]
304 DG Bradman Australia v England at Leeds, 4th Test, 1934 [236]
302 LG Rowe West Indies v England at Bridgetown, 3rd Test, 1973/74 [734]
299* DG Bradman Australia v South Africa at Adelaide, 4th Test, 1931/32 [215]
299 MD Crowe New Zealand v Sri Lanka at Wellington, 1st Test, 1990/91 [1162]
291 IVA Richards West Indies v England at The Oval, 5th Test, 1976 [781]
287 RE Foster England v Australia at Sydney, 1st Test, 1903/04 [78]
285* PBH May England v West Indies at Birmingham, 1st Test, 1957 [439]
281 VVS Laxman India v Australia at Calcutta, 2nd Test, 2000/01 [1535]
280* Javed Miandad Pakistan v India at Hyderabad (Sind), 4th Test, 1982/83 [946]
278 DCS Compton England v Pakistan at Nottingham, 2nd Test, 1954 [388]
277 BC Lara West Indies v Australia at Sydney, 3rd Test, 1992/93 [1208]
375 BC Lara West Indies v England at St John's, 5th Test, 1993/94 [1259]
365* GS Sobers West Indies v Pakistan at Kingston, 3rd Test, 1957/58 [450]
364 L Hutton England v Australia at The Oval, 5th Test, 1938 [266]
340 ST Jayasuriya Sri Lanka v India at Colombo (RPS), 1st Test, 1997/98 [1374]
337 Hanif Mohammad Pakistan v West Indies at Bridgetown, 1st Test, 1957/58 [446]
336* WR Hammond England v New Zealand at Auckland, 2nd Test, 1932/33 [226]
334* MA Taylor Australia v Pakistan at Peshawar, 2nd Test, 1998/99 [1426]
334 DG Bradman Australia v England at Leeds, 3rd Test, 1930 [196]
333 GA Gooch England v India at Lord's, 1st Test, 1990 [1148]
329 Inzamam-ul-Haq Pakistan v New Zealand at Lahore, 1st Test, 2002 [1600]
325 A Sandham England v West Indies at Kingston, 4th Test, 1929/30 [193]
311 RB Simpson Australia v England at Manchester, 4th Test, 1964 [564]
310* JH Edrich England v New Zealand at Leeds, 3rd Test, 1965 [593]
307 RM Cowper Australia v England at Melbourne, 5th Test, 1965/66 [601]
304 DG Bradman Australia v England at Leeds, 4th Test, 1934 [236]
302 LG Rowe West Indies v England at Bridgetown, 3rd Test, 1973/74 [734]
299* DG Bradman Australia v South Africa at Adelaide, 4th Test, 1931/32 [215]
299 MD Crowe New Zealand v Sri Lanka at Wellington, 1st Test, 1990/91 [1162]
291 IVA Richards West Indies v England at The Oval, 5th Test, 1976 [781]
287 RE Foster England v Australia at Sydney, 1st Test, 1903/04 [78]
285* PBH May England v West Indies at Birmingham, 1st Test, 1957 [439]
281 VVS Laxman India v Australia at Calcutta, 2nd Test, 2000/01 [1535]
280* Javed Miandad Pakistan v India at Hyderabad (Sind), 4th Test, 1982/83 [946]
278 DCS Compton England v Pakistan at Nottingham, 2nd Test, 1954 [388]
277 BC Lara West Indies v Australia at Sydney, 3rd Test, 1992/93 [1208]
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- I@n S
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 1999 6:01 pm
- Location: Pakenham
yeah it was entertaining.. Didn't read all that stuff you mosted (be here forever LOL) But to be perfectly honest.. how long have Zimbabwe been playing Test Match cricket? Zimbabwe's bowling was the worst I've seen. I recon the local club I play for couldn've bowlded better to Australia it was that Terrible LOL..
As great as it was I can't see how it should count in the record books. Zimbabwe are no way near test level.. But having said that it gives other players a change to try and beat Haydons record against Zimbabwe.
Brian Lara must be itching to play them now and try to get his record back...
As great as it was I can't see how it should count in the record books. Zimbabwe are no way near test level.. But having said that it gives other players a change to try and beat Haydons record against Zimbabwe.
Brian Lara must be itching to play them now and try to get his record back...
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
Some info for you, I@n.
Zimbabwe have been playing Test cricket for 12 years. They have played 67 Tests, winning 7 and only losing 37. They have beaten England and Pakistan twice.
In this Test, their bowling was good enough to dismiss Langer, Ponting, Martyn and Lehmann for a combined total of 152 and bear in mind, Hayden's first hundred took more than 5 hours.
We've had worse attacks touring here recently - England, Bangladesh - and no Aussie batsman has even scored a double hundred with Hayden's 197 (dropped 4 times) in Brisbane against England being the highest.
Zimbabwe have been on the big stage of world cricket for 23 years. They were elected an Associate member of the ICC on July 23rd, 1981 and in 1983 achieved a famous victory over Australia in the World Cup.
Zimbabwe have been playing Test cricket for 12 years. They have played 67 Tests, winning 7 and only losing 37. They have beaten England and Pakistan twice.
In this Test, their bowling was good enough to dismiss Langer, Ponting, Martyn and Lehmann for a combined total of 152 and bear in mind, Hayden's first hundred took more than 5 hours.
We've had worse attacks touring here recently - England, Bangladesh - and no Aussie batsman has even scored a double hundred with Hayden's 197 (dropped 4 times) in Brisbane against England being the highest.
Zimbabwe have been on the big stage of world cricket for 23 years. They were elected an Associate member of the ICC on July 23rd, 1981 and in 1983 achieved a famous victory over Australia in the World Cup.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
No-one could stop Hayden
By Australian fast bowler Glenn McGrath
October 12, 2003
I DON'T care who we were playing in this Test - the mood I saw Matthew Hayden in for the first two days, I reckon he would have produced an innings like that against anyone.
What an innings! The only unfortunate thing is that, for the past couple of days, I've heard people say it was only the quality of the opposition that allowed him to get the highest score in the history of Test cricket.
It's a way for people to make out his innings wasn't as good because we were playing an inexperienced team like Zimbabwe. It's sad people have to revert to that.
To get the world record, as Haydos has just done, the concentration you require is phenomenal. I actually think you have to concentrate more against teams like Zimbabwe because you can fall into a trap of trying to play shots every ball and quite easily get out.
You just can't take anything away from Haydos and his achievement.
I look back at this year's World Cup when I got 7-15 against Namibia. Some will say it was only against Namibia, and sometimes I think that myself.
But, on proper reflection, I think of that day more for the way I felt and the way the ball was coming out. That was one of the best bowling days I've ever had, but because it was against Namibia, I think, doesn't make it any less.
Haydos can be quite intense and sometimes team meetings go for twice as long because he decides to have his say.
But he dominates an attack just as well as he can drag on a meeting.
For most bowlers, he is simply too big and too strong. He's one of the few batsmen in the world that can physically dominate a bowler, and that's his main strength.
The last thing I'll say is that I'm not that disappointed that Brian Lara no longer holds the world record!
oThe spirit of cricket has been a major talking point and we've now made it public by declaring the standards we're going to set and respect. We've defined our boundaries and hopefully the public will see we are making an effort to improve our image.
Unfortunately the past week has meant I've had to live with images of that confrontation between myself and Ramnaresh Sarwan earlier this year. It was an incident that really affected me for a number of reasons.
I made a conscious effort some time ago to brush up my behaviour and felt as though I'd been going okay, but for whatever reason that dragged me back.
I'm not about to justify what happened, but at that stage it was a tough time in both Jane's and my life because she had just been diagnosed with secondary cancer ... Normally, I'd never react the way I did, that aggressively ... I was disappointed with the way it was portrayed.
Now, in terms of that incident, I'm dealing with the whole situation a lot better. You can't change what's happened, unfortunately, but I think people should get on with things, to be honest.
This Spirit of Cricket document is something the players really wanted to do. We play with pride and passion, and yet we are labelled as sledgers.
Maybe we are a victim of our own success in that there's not many areas you can attack us, but I guess that's one area the opposition feels they can get a bit of an edge over us.
We put in the document that sledging was personal abuse and that's not what we're about and not what the game is about. We feel we have more respect for the game than that.
I know, personally, people have the right to make an opinion about me and that, sometimes, what I see on replay doesn't look good.
In the end I know I can still brush up on aspects of my game, and on-field behaviour is one of them.
By Australian fast bowler Glenn McGrath
October 12, 2003
I DON'T care who we were playing in this Test - the mood I saw Matthew Hayden in for the first two days, I reckon he would have produced an innings like that against anyone.
What an innings! The only unfortunate thing is that, for the past couple of days, I've heard people say it was only the quality of the opposition that allowed him to get the highest score in the history of Test cricket.
It's a way for people to make out his innings wasn't as good because we were playing an inexperienced team like Zimbabwe. It's sad people have to revert to that.
To get the world record, as Haydos has just done, the concentration you require is phenomenal. I actually think you have to concentrate more against teams like Zimbabwe because you can fall into a trap of trying to play shots every ball and quite easily get out.
You just can't take anything away from Haydos and his achievement.
I look back at this year's World Cup when I got 7-15 against Namibia. Some will say it was only against Namibia, and sometimes I think that myself.
But, on proper reflection, I think of that day more for the way I felt and the way the ball was coming out. That was one of the best bowling days I've ever had, but because it was against Namibia, I think, doesn't make it any less.
Haydos can be quite intense and sometimes team meetings go for twice as long because he decides to have his say.
But he dominates an attack just as well as he can drag on a meeting.
For most bowlers, he is simply too big and too strong. He's one of the few batsmen in the world that can physically dominate a bowler, and that's his main strength.
The last thing I'll say is that I'm not that disappointed that Brian Lara no longer holds the world record!
oThe spirit of cricket has been a major talking point and we've now made it public by declaring the standards we're going to set and respect. We've defined our boundaries and hopefully the public will see we are making an effort to improve our image.
Unfortunately the past week has meant I've had to live with images of that confrontation between myself and Ramnaresh Sarwan earlier this year. It was an incident that really affected me for a number of reasons.
I made a conscious effort some time ago to brush up my behaviour and felt as though I'd been going okay, but for whatever reason that dragged me back.
I'm not about to justify what happened, but at that stage it was a tough time in both Jane's and my life because she had just been diagnosed with secondary cancer ... Normally, I'd never react the way I did, that aggressively ... I was disappointed with the way it was portrayed.
Now, in terms of that incident, I'm dealing with the whole situation a lot better. You can't change what's happened, unfortunately, but I think people should get on with things, to be honest.
This Spirit of Cricket document is something the players really wanted to do. We play with pride and passion, and yet we are labelled as sledgers.
Maybe we are a victim of our own success in that there's not many areas you can attack us, but I guess that's one area the opposition feels they can get a bit of an edge over us.
We put in the document that sledging was personal abuse and that's not what we're about and not what the game is about. We feel we have more respect for the game than that.
I know, personally, people have the right to make an opinion about me and that, sometimes, what I see on replay doesn't look good.
In the end I know I can still brush up on aspects of my game, and on-field behaviour is one of them.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
For any Sports Bar readers who find the above long articles hard to read, I've lifted these few lines from the previous post. Very relevant.
------------------------------------------
"What an innings! The only unfortunate thing is that, for the past couple of days, I've heard people say it was only the quality of the opposition that allowed him to get the highest score in the history of Test cricket.
It's a way for people to make out his innings wasn't as good because we were playing an inexperienced team like Zimbabwe. It's sad people have to revert to that.
To get the world record, as Haydos has just done, the concentration you require is phenomenal. I actually think you have to concentrate more against teams like Zimbabwe because you can fall into a trap of trying to play shots every ball and quite easily get out.
You just can't take anything away from Haydos and his achievement"
------------------------------------------
"What an innings! The only unfortunate thing is that, for the past couple of days, I've heard people say it was only the quality of the opposition that allowed him to get the highest score in the history of Test cricket.
It's a way for people to make out his innings wasn't as good because we were playing an inexperienced team like Zimbabwe. It's sad people have to revert to that.
To get the world record, as Haydos has just done, the concentration you require is phenomenal. I actually think you have to concentrate more against teams like Zimbabwe because you can fall into a trap of trying to play shots every ball and quite easily get out.
You just can't take anything away from Haydos and his achievement"
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- zoia
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 10:26 pm
- Location: melbourne/templestowe
- Contact:
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
Pretty spot on, Paul.
Some figures from Lara's world record compared to Hayden's:
BC Lara c Russell b Caddick 375 766 mins 538 balls 45 fours 0 sixes
ML Hayden c Carlisle b Gripper 380 622 mins 437 balls 38 fours 11 sixes
Hayden's innings took 2 hours and 24 minutes and 101 balls less than Lara's.
England's attack contained only one bowler who'd have any claims to being remembered as a good bowler - Angus Fraser - and he was not fast.
His opening partner was Andy Caddick, the third seamer was all-rounder Chris Lewis and their spinner was Phill Tufnell. Get the picture ? Oh, I forgot to mention the very part time offie, Graham Hick, who bowled 18 overs.
The other factor in Lara's knock was the wicket. Lara scored 375 out of 6/593. England also scored 593. The Windies innings took 180 overs and England's, 206. By comparison, Australia's 6/735 took just 146.
Some figures from Lara's world record compared to Hayden's:
BC Lara c Russell b Caddick 375 766 mins 538 balls 45 fours 0 sixes
ML Hayden c Carlisle b Gripper 380 622 mins 437 balls 38 fours 11 sixes
Hayden's innings took 2 hours and 24 minutes and 101 balls less than Lara's.
England's attack contained only one bowler who'd have any claims to being remembered as a good bowler - Angus Fraser - and he was not fast.
His opening partner was Andy Caddick, the third seamer was all-rounder Chris Lewis and their spinner was Phill Tufnell. Get the picture ? Oh, I forgot to mention the very part time offie, Graham Hick, who bowled 18 overs.
The other factor in Lara's knock was the wicket. Lara scored 375 out of 6/593. England also scored 593. The Windies innings took 180 overs and England's, 206. By comparison, Australia's 6/735 took just 146.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
Hayden joins illustrious group
By Mike Coward
October 13, 2003
MATTHEW HAYDEN's extraordinary accomplishment adds substantial weight to the theory that left-handedness is associated with genius.
Indeed, cackhanders of vastly different stature and temperament have held the record for the highest individual innings in Test cricket for the past 45 years.
Hayden, a colossus, has assumed the mantle from Brian Lara, the enigmatic Lilliputian from Trinidad and Tobago, who in turn had won the honour from his mentor, inspiration, friend and fellow West Indian Garfield Sobers.
Until his captain Gerry Alexander allowed Sobers to inch ahead of Len Hutton's 364 in the third Test with Pakistan at Kingston, Jamaica, in February-March 1958 for his first Test century, the record had always been the preserve of right-handers.
As it happened, Sobers was destined to hold the record longer than any other of the great record-breakers - a phenomenal 36 years and one month - before Lara ran amok for his 375 on what he himself described as a marble top of a pitch at St Johns in Antigua in April, 1994.
And the photograph of Sobers coming on to the Recreation Ground to embrace his anointed successor as the genius among modern batsmen is an unforgettable image of the contemporary game.
To this end it was pleasing to learn Lara had taken the trouble to telephone with his congratulations to Hayden, perhaps an indication that he continues to grow as a man away from the middle.
The game has always been one of myriad statistics and the holder of the highest individual score in Test cricket has fascinated the sport's followers since Australia's second captain Will Murdoch scored Test cricket's first double century (211) in the third Test with England at The Oval in August, 1884.
Incidentally, Murdoch, who enjoyed a distinguished career with Sussex and played one Test for England in 1892, was the first scorer of a triple century in Australia for NSW against Victoria in an unending match at the Sydney Cricket Ground in February, 1882.
Only one other statistic resonates quite like the figure of Test cricket's highest individual run-scorer - Donald Bradman's career average of 99.94.
Now it is 380 that sits alongside the 99.94 to be talked about in wonder.
Inevitably, the Don also held the record for the highest individual score but only for two years and nine months until 29-year-old Wally Hammond, relieved to be clear of all the Bodyline angst in Australia, scored an undefeated 336 (with 10 sixes) against New Zealand at Auckland in March-April 1933.
But, along with Sobers, Bradman is the youngest to have achieved the feat. He was 21 when he scored his famous 334 at Headingley, Leeds, in July 1930 - 309 of them on the first day.
For the record, Hayden will turn 32 this month. Lara was 24 when he kissed the marble deck in Antigua.
Hammond had the honour for five years and four months until a 22-year-old Hutton played his famous hand of 364 at The Oval in 1938 - an occasion also remembered for Bradman fracturing his right ankle while bowling to a rampant England, who won by a phenomenal innings and 579 runs.
Hutton batted for 13 hours and 17 minutes - three hours and three minutes longer than Sobers.
But spare a thought for England opening batsman Andy Sandham, who became the first man to score 300 in a Test match but held on to his record for just 99 days before Bradman started his fascinating love affair with Headingley and the people of Yorkshire with his 334.
Furthermore, 39-year-old Sandham amassed 325 in his 14th and, astonishingly, final Test match at Sabina Park, Kingston, Jamaica which was abandoned after persistent rain on the eighth and ninth days.
It was Sandham's misfortune to be scoring heavily in county cricket when his famous Surrey team-mate Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe were at the peak of their powers and he was consistently overlooked at selection.
There is some symmetry in Hayden setting this fantastic new mark in the opening Test match of the 2003-04 season.
It was in the first Test of 1903-04 at the SCG that Reg "Tip" Foster caused a sensation by scoring 287 in his first Test for England, so eclipsing Murdoch's record of 1884.
Indeed, only one double century was scored in the interim - by Syd Gregory against England in December 1894 and also at the SCG.
Foster, a gifted sportsman and the only man to have captained England at cricket and soccer, played just eight Test matches and died from the effects of diabetes at 36.
Like Sobers and Lara before him, Hayden has thrown down the challenge to the world's elite right-handers.
Given the nature of contemporary Test cricket, it will not be surprising if someone accepts the challenge in the very near future.
By Mike Coward
October 13, 2003
MATTHEW HAYDEN's extraordinary accomplishment adds substantial weight to the theory that left-handedness is associated with genius.
Indeed, cackhanders of vastly different stature and temperament have held the record for the highest individual innings in Test cricket for the past 45 years.
Hayden, a colossus, has assumed the mantle from Brian Lara, the enigmatic Lilliputian from Trinidad and Tobago, who in turn had won the honour from his mentor, inspiration, friend and fellow West Indian Garfield Sobers.
Until his captain Gerry Alexander allowed Sobers to inch ahead of Len Hutton's 364 in the third Test with Pakistan at Kingston, Jamaica, in February-March 1958 for his first Test century, the record had always been the preserve of right-handers.
As it happened, Sobers was destined to hold the record longer than any other of the great record-breakers - a phenomenal 36 years and one month - before Lara ran amok for his 375 on what he himself described as a marble top of a pitch at St Johns in Antigua in April, 1994.
And the photograph of Sobers coming on to the Recreation Ground to embrace his anointed successor as the genius among modern batsmen is an unforgettable image of the contemporary game.
To this end it was pleasing to learn Lara had taken the trouble to telephone with his congratulations to Hayden, perhaps an indication that he continues to grow as a man away from the middle.
The game has always been one of myriad statistics and the holder of the highest individual score in Test cricket has fascinated the sport's followers since Australia's second captain Will Murdoch scored Test cricket's first double century (211) in the third Test with England at The Oval in August, 1884.
Incidentally, Murdoch, who enjoyed a distinguished career with Sussex and played one Test for England in 1892, was the first scorer of a triple century in Australia for NSW against Victoria in an unending match at the Sydney Cricket Ground in February, 1882.
Only one other statistic resonates quite like the figure of Test cricket's highest individual run-scorer - Donald Bradman's career average of 99.94.
Now it is 380 that sits alongside the 99.94 to be talked about in wonder.
Inevitably, the Don also held the record for the highest individual score but only for two years and nine months until 29-year-old Wally Hammond, relieved to be clear of all the Bodyline angst in Australia, scored an undefeated 336 (with 10 sixes) against New Zealand at Auckland in March-April 1933.
But, along with Sobers, Bradman is the youngest to have achieved the feat. He was 21 when he scored his famous 334 at Headingley, Leeds, in July 1930 - 309 of them on the first day.
For the record, Hayden will turn 32 this month. Lara was 24 when he kissed the marble deck in Antigua.
Hammond had the honour for five years and four months until a 22-year-old Hutton played his famous hand of 364 at The Oval in 1938 - an occasion also remembered for Bradman fracturing his right ankle while bowling to a rampant England, who won by a phenomenal innings and 579 runs.
Hutton batted for 13 hours and 17 minutes - three hours and three minutes longer than Sobers.
But spare a thought for England opening batsman Andy Sandham, who became the first man to score 300 in a Test match but held on to his record for just 99 days before Bradman started his fascinating love affair with Headingley and the people of Yorkshire with his 334.
Furthermore, 39-year-old Sandham amassed 325 in his 14th and, astonishingly, final Test match at Sabina Park, Kingston, Jamaica which was abandoned after persistent rain on the eighth and ninth days.
It was Sandham's misfortune to be scoring heavily in county cricket when his famous Surrey team-mate Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe were at the peak of their powers and he was consistently overlooked at selection.
There is some symmetry in Hayden setting this fantastic new mark in the opening Test match of the 2003-04 season.
It was in the first Test of 1903-04 at the SCG that Reg "Tip" Foster caused a sensation by scoring 287 in his first Test for England, so eclipsing Murdoch's record of 1884.
Indeed, only one double century was scored in the interim - by Syd Gregory against England in December 1894 and also at the SCG.
Foster, a gifted sportsman and the only man to have captained England at cricket and soccer, played just eight Test matches and died from the effects of diabetes at 36.
Like Sobers and Lara before him, Hayden has thrown down the challenge to the world's elite right-handers.
Given the nature of contemporary Test cricket, it will not be surprising if someone accepts the challenge in the very near future.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
- Kristin5
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2001 6:01 pm
Matthew Hayden's batting performance was AWESOME. All credit to him - it shouldn't matter who the opposition was, as Donny's statistics have shown Matty's batting was superb and the record was well deserved.
If the opposition are such easy beats, why hasn't anyone else been able to break the individual batting record against them? How did other top batsmen go out to them? So many questions, so few answers... Do not take any credit away from Matty's performance as it was top class all the way!
Matty Hayden - you were magnificent. Stand up and take a bow!
If the opposition are such easy beats, why hasn't anyone else been able to break the individual batting record against them? How did other top batsmen go out to them? So many questions, so few answers... Do not take any credit away from Matty's performance as it was top class all the way!
Matty Hayden - you were magnificent. Stand up and take a bow!
"I'm sure people see me as a screaming redhead with a big pair of boobs, but I like to think I've got things to say." Geri Halliwell, former member of the Spice Girls.
-
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 7:27 pm
- Location: Toowoomba, Qld
I hate it when people try to downplay Hayden's magnificent achievement by saying "look who he scored them against". Well cricket has been played for well over 100 years. There have been over 1000 test matches. Some of these games have involved very ordinary attacks on very good batting tracks and yet Hayden posted the largest score ever.
This test series needed something like this to raise interest and Matt did it. He is really stamping himself in the record books as one of the greatest batsman of all time and he has done it through a combination of talent and bloody hard work. Well done Matt!
This test series needed something like this to raise interest and Matt did it. He is really stamping himself in the record books as one of the greatest batsman of all time and he has done it through a combination of talent and bloody hard work. Well done Matt!
- Donny
- Posts: 80336
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 28 times
Latest Test ratings:
1 Matthew Hayden AUS 895 57.67
2 Brian Lara WI 887 51.56
3 +3 Ricky Ponting AUS 847 52.73
4 -1 Rahul Dravid IND 809 54.38
5 -1 Adam Gilchrist AUS 806 60.25
6 -1 Inzamam-ul-Haq PAK 797 49.54
7 -1 Sachin Tendulkar IND 779 56.57
8 +6 Mark Richardson NZ 765 49.37
9 -1 Marcus Trescothick ENG 751 43.11
10 +1 Kumar Sangakkara SL 737 48.20
11 -1 Herschelle Gibbs SA 735 44.77
12 Steve Waugh AUS 731 51.25
1 Matthew Hayden AUS 895 57.67
2 Brian Lara WI 887 51.56
3 +3 Ricky Ponting AUS 847 52.73
4 -1 Rahul Dravid IND 809 54.38
5 -1 Adam Gilchrist AUS 806 60.25
6 -1 Inzamam-ul-Haq PAK 797 49.54
7 -1 Sachin Tendulkar IND 779 56.57
8 +6 Mark Richardson NZ 765 49.37
9 -1 Marcus Trescothick ENG 751 43.11
10 +1 Kumar Sangakkara SL 737 48.20
11 -1 Herschelle Gibbs SA 735 44.77
12 Steve Waugh AUS 731 51.25
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.