Essendon players guilty! Bans til November 2016!
Moderator: bbmods
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
- Jezza
- Posts: 29547
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 359 times
Media lawyer Justin Quill believes that the relevant past and present Essendon players could have the ability to sue Essendon for negligence and that they would most likely win the case as well.
He claims that the players could sue the club on the grounds of:
i). Loss of future earning capacity - Not just for being banned this year but for future years where delistings could occur especially if players stall in development and other scenarios where future job prospects are hindered such as being involved in coaching in the system for example.
ii). Pain and suffering.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendo ... 7706517914
He claims that the players could sue the club on the grounds of:
i). Loss of future earning capacity - Not just for being banned this year but for future years where delistings could occur especially if players stall in development and other scenarios where future job prospects are hindered such as being involved in coaching in the system for example.
ii). Pain and suffering.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendo ... 7706517914
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendo ... 7706560394
God the AFLPA are look like complete and utter Idiots.
So Marsh thinks that Players can do what they want and never get in trouble.
WHAT A FLOG
God the AFLPA are look like complete and utter Idiots.
So Marsh thinks that Players can do what they want and never get in trouble.
WHAT A FLOG
I am Da Man
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Oh there'll be lawsuits alright. Essendon's insurer is already in the foetal position crying in anticipationJezza wrote:Media lawyer Justin Quill believes that the relevant past and present Essendon players could have the ability to sue Essendon for negligence and that they would most likely win the case as well.
He claims that the players could sue the club on the grounds of:
i). Loss of future earning capacity - Not just for being banned this year but for future years where delistings could occur especially if players stall in development and other scenarios where future job prospects are hindered such as being involved in coaching in the system for example.
ii). Pain and suffering.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendo ... 7706517914
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
Essendon will get there Ass Sued that Much they won't have much money t all left afterwardsstui magpie wrote:Oh there'll be lawsuits alright. Essendon's insurer is already in the foetal position crying in anticipationJezza wrote:Media lawyer Justin Quill believes that the relevant past and present Essendon players could have the ability to sue Essendon for negligence and that they would most likely win the case as well.
He claims that the players could sue the club on the grounds of:
i). Loss of future earning capacity - Not just for being banned this year but for future years where delistings could occur especially if players stall in development and other scenarios where future job prospects are hindered such as being involved in coaching in the system for example.
ii). Pain and suffering.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendo ... 7706517914
I am Da Man
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
- Pi
- Posts: 999
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:30 pm
- Location: SA
imagine the large koala is the AFL and the little one is James Turd having a cry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0cAx1jLbJk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0cAx1jLbJk
Pi = Infinite = Collingwood = Always
Floreat Pica
Floreat Pica
- piedys
- Posts: 13425
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Asylum
- Has liked: 371 times
- Been liked: 101 times
Lol, at All the Young Dopers.simon tonna wrote: "did you hear the news today oh boy" David Bowie. rip. essendon meh.
Vale Bowie.
Hey skip, some of us 6 foot 4 jerkoffs might take resemblance to that remark!think positive wrote:... my daughter ^&*^*% ex has been training with them for 8 months, when he is a basketballer. 6 foot 4 jerkoff! fit right in!
So does that mean if WADA doesn't approve Viagra, then i can't get "any action" for 2016? And any do any of my 2015 conquests become null and void? Who do i sue? I want compensation dammit!
Stui, surely the insurer would void any club policy related to claims by players in this instance?stui magpie wrote:Oh there'll be lawsuits alright. Essendon's insurer is already in the foetal position crying in anticipationJezza wrote:Media lawyer Justin Quill believes that the relevant past and present Essendon players could have the ability to sue Essendon for negligence and that they would most likely win the case as well.
He claims that the players could sue the club on the grounds of:
i). Loss of future earning capacity - Not just for being banned this year but for future years where delistings could occur especially if players stall in development and other scenarios where future job prospects are hindered such as being involved in coaching in the system for example.
ii). Pain and suffering.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/essendo ... 7706517914
Do insurance companies cover damage claims made by drug effected drivers who cause accidents? Of course not! So the insurer will be offering the "too bad - so sad, please read the fine print next time" clause to the club, i'd expect. The Dons may well go a row of shithouses here...
Dyso
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
-
- Posts: 6077
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:41 pm
- Been liked: 118 times
AFL 360 had a special live last night. They grilled Gill good. Robbo got questioned by Kingy asking him did he get lied to by Hird about what happened. He paused forever and said everyone had told lies and twisted versions of the truth.
Most important they revealed the reason the players where found guilty was they had filled out forms stating what had happened and they all (every player) denied being injected with anything at any time and never took any unknown pills or substances. The players lied to ASADA point blank and that's why CAS deemed it was more than probable they had taken an illicit substance (like a game of join th dots)
On the issue of the players taking legal action Robbo said if they did (and all legal advice says they can and would be successful) he said even if they got lost wages, damages and loss of future income if they received $500k each on average that's $17million the dopers are up for.
This morning I spoke to a legal mate of mine and he believes without knowing the exact terms of the dopers insurance policy they wouldn't be covered for negelence but the directors would have indemnity insurance against losing there personal assets. Said it would be interesting court case insurance v directors
Most important they revealed the reason the players where found guilty was they had filled out forms stating what had happened and they all (every player) denied being injected with anything at any time and never took any unknown pills or substances. The players lied to ASADA point blank and that's why CAS deemed it was more than probable they had taken an illicit substance (like a game of join th dots)
On the issue of the players taking legal action Robbo said if they did (and all legal advice says they can and would be successful) he said even if they got lost wages, damages and loss of future income if they received $500k each on average that's $17million the dopers are up for.
This morning I spoke to a legal mate of mine and he believes without knowing the exact terms of the dopers insurance policy they wouldn't be covered for negelence but the directors would have indemnity insurance against losing there personal assets. Said it would be interesting court case insurance v directors