Jed Adcock

John Wren · Post by **John Wren** » Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:34 pm

so, now blair is not daicos. dear me.

piedys · Post by **piedys** » Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:48 pm

John Wren wrote:so, now blair is not daicos. dear me.

Didn't some dipshit thread on the AwFuL website try to compare Therapist to Daicos earlier this year, and some **** voted for Milne?!

Stinger · Post by **Stinger** » Fri Oct 30, 2015 10:05 pm

Any love?

I think he'd be a handy pick up for two years. Just another reason to rub it into the Brions.

Presti35 · Post by **Presti35** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 am

Yep. I'm all over it.

I think he fits a need on our back flank. Yeah he is 28/29, but I think he'd fit in our best 22 for at least 12 months.

And like you said, it'd be another kick in the guts to Brisbane if it worked out.

I would almost think of it like a part of the Aish deal, as we wouldn't lose any picks in signing him. And it helps make up that we don't have any picks between 27 and 66. In saying all that, could he have been a part of the Aish deal?

I think we need to sign someone as a FA, and I'd like it to be Adcock.

Cuthbert Collingwood · Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:50 am

I'd think that if we were tilting for a flag next year he'd be worth a look, but at the expense of a kid? Let's see...

.... what Hine thinks
(Sorry thompsoc old stick but he da man

)

Brown26 · Post by **Brown26** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 10:59 am

It all comes down to the really doesn't it - is there someone in the draft this year who is better than Adcock (or will be)? Of course, if this is a crap draft we have the option of offering Adcock a 1 year deal and then we can use his spot in next years draft. If we take a draftee this year they have to have a 2 year deal so we couldn't take anyone next year (in that spot).

I reckon he'd be worth it unless a Marsh et al falls down to pick 84...

- Ben

On the March · Post by **On the March** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:31 am

It is a bit strange how he has been deleted from the Lions list. He is certainly not their oldest and his form seems ok.

Something smells

woftam · Post by **woftam** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:06 pm

I think we have more than enough half back flankers on our list right now. No need to add a veteran one as well.

Maynard, Scharenberg, Williams, Sinclair, Langdon & Tooves would all be in front of him for game time.

Just doesn't fit a need in my opinion.

jackcass · Post by **jackcass** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 6:06 pm

woftam wrote:I think we have more than enough half back flankers on our list right now. No need to add a veteran one as well.

Maynard, Scharenberg, Williams, Sinclair, Langdon & Tooves would all be in front of him for game time.

Just doesn't fit a need in my opinion.

Yep, this. Don't think he's as good as a couple of our emerging kids so why bother.

Wokko · Post by **Wokko** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 6:12 pm

Some teams could really use a quality veteran back flanker... we're not one of them.

Cuthbert Collingwood · Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:12 pm

Wokko wrote:Some teams could really use a quality veteran back flanker... we're not one of them.

Wouldn't even fit in at Carlton as they have Murphy and Gibbs!

inxs88 · Post by **inxs88** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:57 pm

Prefer James Kelly if we go down this route..

Presti35 · Post by **Presti35** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:15 pm

inxs88 wrote:Prefer James Kelly if we go down this route..

True, but i think he's given it away.

piedys · Post by **piedys** » Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:06 pm

SwansWay wrote:Something out of left field, but if we could draft him for nothing or next to, I think he'd be a useful acquisition down back. Thoughts? He's got at least three more years in him.

As this is the original thread, perhaps the mods can merge all three into one please?

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Jed Adcock

Jed Adcock?

Re: Jed Adcock