West Coke

Use this forum for non-Collingwood related footy topics that don't relate specifically to any of the other forums. For non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar and for non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
didick
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Brisbane
Been liked: 1 time

West Coke

Post by didick »

Will the AFL investigate Chicks claims with any vigour? Gillan said it was 10 years ago but they will investigate. How long is too long ago? If the claims are true and Weagles players were juiced to the max and running out feeling invincible, I'd be pissed if i was an opponent who was beaten, even if it was 10 years ago. As a supporter, if it turned out my team was knocked off in a granny 10 years earlier I'd be dirty as. Particularly if it wasn't just individuals doing it on the sly but was being orchestrated by club officials.
"The night is a very dark time for me" Chaz Michael Michaels
User avatar
ANNODAM
Posts: 11173
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Eltham, VIC.
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 34 times

Post by ANNODAM »

It wasn't/isn't only WC you know, wait & see how many more will come to the fore in the future.
WE WERE ROBBED, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MEEE!

N.Y METS, N.Y GIANTS, PENRITH PANTHERS & HOBART HURRICANES FAN.

WE ALL LOOK GOOD AT TRAINING, IT'S THE MATCHES THAT COUNT!
Domesticated_Ape
Posts: 525
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:27 pm

Post by Domesticated_Ape »

I thought something like this was happening at the time. Hard to say if it gave them any benefit or not. They had a pretty decent side. Maybe it would have been 2 or 3 flags if they stayed clean. No one knows.

Nothing will come from the investigation. Not sure the AFL even have any power over the majority of the people involved anymore.

We should still bag them for it though, they're the wrong sort of birds.
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Re: West Coke

Post by piedys »

didick wrote:Will the AFL investigate Chicks claims with any vigour? Gillan said it was 10 years ago but they will investigate. How long is too long ago? If the claims are true and Weagles players were juiced to the max and running out feeling invincible, I'd be pissed if i was an opponent who was beaten, even if it was 10 years ago. As a supporter, if it turned out my team was knocked off in a granny 10 years earlier I'd be dirty as. Particularly if it wasn't just individuals doing it on the sly but was being orchestrated by club officials.
Hope WADA gets involved, and all the retired/departed WCE players and officials tell them all to go suck a prick.

Everybody knows <snip - no, we don't know that for a fact>
Stories from that era of the players literally jumping the fence at the WACA to dodge AFL drug testers are Stuff of Legend.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
David
Posts: 50690
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 84 times

Post by David »

Interesting that the 'furious' responses to Chick's claims mostly seem to be worried about timing. There was a whole article with Andrew Embley which essentially amounted to "The club was really good to us; we don't deserve this" - hardly the point, I would have thought.

Perhaps the timing is opportunistic on Chick's part, but I'm not sure there's ever really a bad time for the truth to come out (if this is indeed the truth). The AFL PR industry is such a massive beast that they'd rather shoot the messenger than confront any uncomfortable realities.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
partypie
Posts: 1172
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:43 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Re: West Coke

Post by partypie »

piedys wrote:
didick wrote:Will the AFL investigate Chicks claims with any vigour? Gillan said it was 10 years ago but they will investigate. How long is too long ago? If the claims are true and Weagles players were juiced to the max and running out feeling invincible, I'd be pissed if i was an opponent who was beaten, even if it was 10 years ago. As a supporter, if it turned out my team was knocked off in a granny 10 years earlier I'd be dirty as. Particularly if it wasn't just individuals doing it on the sly but was being orchestrated by club officials.
Hope WADA gets involved, and all the retired/departed WCE players and officials tell them all to go suck a prick.

Everybody knows <snip - no, we don't know that for a fact>
Stories from that era of the players literally jumping the fence at the WACA to dodge AFL drug testers are Stuff of Legend.
I heard that in the 90s they got tipped off before they got tested.
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

Compare the size of the 80s Hawks to the other teams... not sure that was weights.. ditto 1992 Eagles...
Get back on top.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29547
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 272 times
Been liked: 359 times

Post by Jezza »

David wrote:Interesting that the 'furious' responses to Chick's claims mostly seem to be worried about timing. There was a whole article with Andrew Embley which essentially amounted to "The club was really good to us; we don't deserve this" - hardly the point, I would have thought.

Perhaps the timing is opportunistic on Chick's part, but I'm not sure there's ever really a bad time for the truth to come out (if this is indeed the truth). The AFL PR industry is such a massive beast that they'd rather shoot the messenger than confront any uncomfortable realities.
I heard that Chick had been speaking to the media on and off for nearly a year apparently (or at the very least it was a few months before the article was published last week) but the timing of it does seem convenient especially for the Herald Sun.

I think the AFL needs to investigate anything that may bring the game's integrity into question. I think Mike Sheahan said the West Coast flag was 'tainted' and while they had a strong team I think there's validity in this comment as that particular side is surrounded by controversy that has never disappeared as the years have gone on.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
Post Reply