They'll claim that Dank was guilty for trafficking performance enhancing drugs when he was working with Essendon and these drugs were used by the coaching staff including James Hird but of course this isn't illegal under the WADA code but this was never used by the players.swoop42 wrote:How can Dank be guilty if Essendon are not?
What am I missing here?
It isn't common sense.
However it can't be proven that the players used the substances even though the circumstantial evidence for such usage is quite compelling and strong and there was no documentation retained proving that Essendon was either guilty or not.
Blind Freddy can see that Essendon players are guilty whether they intentionally took the substances or not but to say that they're innocent because of the verdict a few weeks ago is laughable and proves how farcical this whole situation has been since it first came to light in February 2013.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 