Sounds Interesting
Does anyone know if this is confirmed or just an Ideas?
2007 Cricket World Cup
-
gobbles21
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Tiwi Islands, NT, Australia
-
commonwombat
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 7:52 pm
- Location: sydney/s.africa
- Contact:
Disagree with extending the numbers.
A few of these will be embarassingly poor and uncompetitive. Examples lie Namibia at last one, UAE at past ones.
Netherlands and Canada have shown signs of reasonable competitiveness so can be justified but Namibia, UAE, Scotland, USA no way.
The ICC has already ballsed up with the admission of countries to test level. Sri Lanka was ready in mid 70's but had to wait to after 1980.
Zimbabwe was held back to 1992 when shown competitive in 83 W.Cup. On other hand they've jumped the gun with Bangladesh and have egg on their faces whereas Kenya at ODI level have far superior form on the board.
A few of these will be embarassingly poor and uncompetitive. Examples lie Namibia at last one, UAE at past ones.
Netherlands and Canada have shown signs of reasonable competitiveness so can be justified but Namibia, UAE, Scotland, USA no way.
The ICC has already ballsed up with the admission of countries to test level. Sri Lanka was ready in mid 70's but had to wait to after 1980.
Zimbabwe was held back to 1992 when shown competitive in 83 W.Cup. On other hand they've jumped the gun with Bangladesh and have egg on their faces whereas Kenya at ODI level have far superior form on the board.
he's an animal, what can u expect!!!