The "What do we get for Beams?" thread
Moderator: bbmods
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
- Darkstranger
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:06 am
- warburton lad
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:47 am
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 60 times
- Darkstranger
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 9:06 am
- John Wren
- Posts: 24186
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all the way.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Hird's lawyers outsmarted Essendon in last week. Appeal to happen so then we'll all see.
Last edited by watt price tully on Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
She might have been right all along but the fact remains she went with the story too early & made herself look silly. Better to be sure you're right than sure you're first.watt price tully wrote:She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all along the way.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
- John Wren
- Posts: 24186
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm
correct. i would like to see just one thread that mentions caro to be free from character assassination. nothing new ever gets said when this occurs.watt price tully wrote:She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all the way.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Hird's lawyers outsmarted Essendon in last week. Appeal to happen so then we'll all see.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
She hasn't blamed anyone DTM re Essendon except Hird - saying quite rightly from the outset that he should've stood down & taken responsibility - which he hasn't (anyway this is for another thread)Dave The Man wrote:Like she is Blaming someone else
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm