Pre Match: Collingwood Vs Geelong - All comments here

GreekLunatic · Post by **GreekLunatic** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 5:32 pm

i hope and i know we will kick tha cats butts also for someone doing the score board at the start of nicks page the games on at 7 10 not 2 10

Scarlett Pimp · Post by **Scarlett Pimp** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 5:37 pm

couragous cloke wrote:f*** off back to your hand bag site combover.

you jealous pr***

<Somewhat gratutious but completely understandable profanity removed. Why, oh why do they keep coming to our Magpie site? Oh well - WhyPhilWhy? for the Mods

Courageous Cloke eh... When did David retire? You're living in the past a bit, don't you think?

I'm not being antagonising at all. I came here, the same way macedonian_marvel, snappy tom, ham pies etc come and play with us. It's only friendly rivalry.

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 7:07 pm

Lets not forget that curiosity KILLS THE CAT

Here pussy pussy.......

couragous cloke · Post by **couragous cloke** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:26 pm

i dont care for your so called "friendly rivalry" piss off and go chat with your other handbag supporters.

The Prototype · Post by **The Prototype** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:40 pm

Scarlett Pimp wrote:
couragous cloke wrote:f*** off back to your hand bag site combover.

you jealous pr***

<Somewhat gratutious but completely understandable profanity removed. Why, oh why do they keep coming to our Magpie site? Oh well - WhyPhilWhy? for the Mods
Courageous Cloke eh... When did David retire? You're living in the past a bit, don't you think?

I'm not being antagonising at all. I came here, the same way macedonian_marvel, snappy tom, ham pies etc come and play with us. It's only friendly rivalry.

Have you forgotten there is 2 other Cloke's playing for Collingwood? As for "friendly rivalry" You are in the wrong place, just because there is Collingwood supporters over at your "hang out" doesn't mean you are allowed here...Now that is said, onto the topic at hand the game.

I am going to say that Collingwood might be a bit too strong in the ruck now that Steven King is gone, I'm not sure that Peter Street would be a good ruckman for them for the game, seeing as he isn't really that good. Seen him down here, he was okay down here, but seems lost in the AFL. Collingwood's backline probably bigger and faster then Geelong's and the same can be said for the forward line. So a big win for Collingwood coming up.

hoggy · Post by **hoggy** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 9:10 pm

Scarlett Pimp wrote:ham pies etc come and play with us. It's only friendly rivalry.

Scarlett Pimp · Post by **Scarlett Pimp** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 9:45 am

Prototype wrote:Have you forgotten there is 2 other Cloke's playing for Collingwood?

No, I knew that they were on the list, I was just confused by the word proceeding Cloke. I had to rack my brains and come up with David as the courageous one.

Scarlett Pimp · Post by **Scarlett Pimp** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 9:49 am

Undoubtedly, we will be terrible in the ruck contests this Saturday night. Street should never have been an AFL footballer, and Chambers needs another 18mths before he will be a genuine ruckman. Unfortunately for him, with the drafting of Mark Blake at 200cm, he MAY be overlooked in the future.

Having said all that, Street/Chambers will still outscore Fraser/McKee in the hitout dept, it's just a matter of which onball brigade uses them most effectively. I say it will be you guys.

Scarlett Pimp · Post by **Scarlett Pimp** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 10:21 am

tessa403 wrote:Pimp, sort of suits a Geelong supporter that name with their reputation from the 80`s,90`s 00`s.

Now don`t you have a decent board to chat about your pathetic pussy`s on? If not bad luck! Go Away.

Yes, it does, doesn't it? I think it really suits. Just a shame it's based on a 100yo novel, eh?

I do have a decent board to go to, but I enjoy intelligent conversation about the upcoming game. Are you implying I'm in the wrong place?

Is Clement a definite 'in'?

magpie willow · Post by **magpie willow** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 11:08 am

Everyone stop bitching and lets get some positive input into this topic here is my imput

WE WILL WIPE THE DOME FLOOR WITH THE PUSSIES!!!!!!!

Joel · Post by **Joel** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 11:11 am

Come on guys, let's discuss the game.

Blanch · Post by **Blanch** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 11:46 am

Scarlett Pimp wrote:No, I knew that they were on the list, I was just confused by the word proceeding Cloke.

I enjoy intelligent conversation about the upcoming game. Are you implying I'm in the wrong place?

Now listen here buddy. This is just one of insults concerning intelligence. How about learning the difference between proceeding (as in going ahead with something) and preceding (as in before). Intelligence is not something you should come here and question when you prove to us you lack it yourself. A typo is a typo....this is lack of intellect.

Sorry I'll get back to the topic now. Pies by more than 10 goals...no King, no team.

d9 tank · Post by **d9 tank** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:48 pm

Clement is no definite.

I'd say he'll be named tonight, but could very likely be a late withdrawl.

A backline minus Presti, Cloke and Clement could see us in a bit of trouble. Lucky we're playing against the worse attck in the league this week.

peter_pies4ever · Post by **peter_pies4ever** » Thu Jul 31, 2003 5:50 pm

The team has just been named:
In: Cloke
Out: Prestigiacomo

Pie4Life · Post by **Pie4Life** » Fri Aug 01, 2003 1:26 am

Damn, I hoped Jimmy would come in this week. Oh well.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

Pre Match: Collingwood Vs Geelong - All comments here