Our approach to the VFL in 2012
Moderator: bbmods
- MagpieBat
- Posts: 17846
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:05 pm
- Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
Our approach to the VFL in 2012
I understand that our approach to the VFL side has been about development over victory, but I wonder if perhaps that attitude should change slightly from next year onwards. Should we place a bit more emphasis on winning VFL games and at least contesting the VFL finals, rather than treating them as 'bonus' games? Our VFL side didn't make it to the finals, so our seniors were without a back-up outfit to keep 2nd tier players in match fitness as we went into September.
And while I'm at it, I think we should have a go at setting up a VFL Reserves side, to complement the VFL senior side (which complements the AFL side!). It would give us another avenue for playing injured players back into fitness, allow us to keep our top-up players playing to our game style, and would also allow for more flexibility when developing players for their roles at AFL level.
For example, if we wanted to give more time to Ceglar for rucking, we could play him as number 1 ruck in the VFL Reserves and Witts plays as no. 1 ruck in the VFL seniors. Or the other way around. This is just one example of what we could do with a second VFL team. We are, after all, about investing in our sources, aren't we?
Thoughts, ideas?
And while I'm at it, I think we should have a go at setting up a VFL Reserves side, to complement the VFL senior side (which complements the AFL side!). It would give us another avenue for playing injured players back into fitness, allow us to keep our top-up players playing to our game style, and would also allow for more flexibility when developing players for their roles at AFL level.
For example, if we wanted to give more time to Ceglar for rucking, we could play him as number 1 ruck in the VFL Reserves and Witts plays as no. 1 ruck in the VFL seniors. Or the other way around. This is just one example of what we could do with a second VFL team. We are, after all, about investing in our sources, aren't we?
Thoughts, ideas?
I am vengeance. I am the night. I am MagpieBat.
- jackcass
- Posts: 12529
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
- Location: Bendigo
I think 2012 will be better year for the VFL side any way. All the kids will have another preseason under their belts and will be better equiped. Add a few new recruits and all players (hopefully) available after the off season surgery and I think we'll be very competitive.
I also like the idea of a VFL reserves team. Allows all the kids who can't get into the VFL seniors to play together along with top ups and potential NSW rookies who are still to come into the system. Any opportunity to ensure the kids are getting the Collingwood message and familiarisation with the game plan and structures has to help. If nothing else it cements the culture.
I also like the idea of a VFL reserves team. Allows all the kids who can't get into the VFL seniors to play together along with top ups and potential NSW rookies who are still to come into the system. Any opportunity to ensure the kids are getting the Collingwood message and familiarisation with the game plan and structures has to help. If nothing else it cements the culture.
- MagpieBat
- Posts: 17846
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:05 pm
- Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
Purely from a spectator's point of view, I'd like to see a VFL reserves team if only to have them play as a curtain raiser to the VFL seniors on the same day, preferably Saturday afternoon at Vicky Park.
Then, all we would have to do is wrangle some more Saturday night games at the G, and we would have triple header Saturdays to look forward to!
Then, all we would have to do is wrangle some more Saturday night games at the G, and we would have triple header Saturdays to look forward to!
I am vengeance. I am the night. I am MagpieBat.
- Culprit
- Posts: 17243
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Port Melbourne
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 68 times
The focus of the VFL team will be to win in 2012. The club realised this year that when they needed to get game time into some players it could not and went in to finals with players underdone. From the recruiting side that I know about they have focussed on key areas to make the team a winning combination. For the first time since the VFL team came along I may actually go as I saw no point going to watch a team that focussed on getting players ready to play in the seniors first and winning was not really the intent of the coaching staff.
The focus has to be winning and developing players along the way so when they step up into the seniors they are ready.
I was not a fan of Tarks as a coach, I have now changed my view and I expect a different VFL team running out in 2012.
The focus has to be winning and developing players along the way so when they step up into the seniors they are ready.
I was not a fan of Tarks as a coach, I have now changed my view and I expect a different VFL team running out in 2012.
- MagpieBat
- Posts: 17846
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:05 pm
- Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
- Presti35
- Posts: 19942
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has liked: 449 times
- Been liked: 227 times
As a VFL reguler, I'd like to see more wins. We could have, and should have, made the finals last season.
You get the feeling that alot of the players will come out on fire early. There were too many games we lost that we sholdnt have in 2011.
But like you said Bat, they are more about developing and prepareing players than just winning.
Losing Sundberg will hurt alot. Losing K Pendles will hurt too.
Looking forward to getting out to Vic Park in 2012. The ground will look alot different since our last visit there!!
BTW, like the idea about a reserves team. Makes sence.
You get the feeling that alot of the players will come out on fire early. There were too many games we lost that we sholdnt have in 2011.
But like you said Bat, they are more about developing and prepareing players than just winning.
Losing Sundberg will hurt alot. Losing K Pendles will hurt too.
Looking forward to getting out to Vic Park in 2012. The ground will look alot different since our last visit there!!
BTW, like the idea about a reserves team. Makes sence.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
- Dave The Man
- Posts: 45002
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 23 times
- Contact:
- tommo
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:21 pm
That 100% confirmed or just what you think will happen? I personally think there are better VFL players then both of these 2, and would appear more likely to get picked up by clubs. (If that's what you mean by losing them)Presti#1Fan wrote:
Losing Sundberg will hurt alot. Losing K Pendles will hurt too.
I'd like to hang onto both Sundberg and Pendles, but it will be a task you'd imagine.
Black and White - Through and Through - Side by Side - Us against Them
- Culprit
- Posts: 17243
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
- Location: Port Melbourne
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 68 times
Matty Boland is a young big full forward, Acurate kick. Never got a go at Sandy due to them dropping St Kilda Players back. Ferraro is Luke Ball/Scott Burns type. He will get you first use of the ball. Doria will hit Boland with every kick. They more than account for Sundberg and Pendles as outs. We will drop players back and if what I am told is correct not to the disadvantage of the VFL players. Will be interesting and I am keen to go.
Now I do not go to VFL, only watch what I see on TV and as the players it's what I have seen in local footy.
DTM, I am told after the draft we will have a better idea of who will be still available. That goes for Collingwood and The Rams
Now I do not go to VFL, only watch what I see on TV and as the players it's what I have seen in local footy.
DTM, I am told after the draft we will have a better idea of who will be still available. That goes for Collingwood and The Rams
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54850
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Developing players still needs to be the primary focus IMO. That's what we got our own VFL team for, so we could control who played where and for how long.
Winning has to be secondary but that doesn't mean we don't try to win, we just try to win while developing players in the roles we want to use them at AFL level, or in developing skills to help them at AFL level.
The main reason we lost so many games this year in the VFL IMO was because we lost so much depth. We turned over a lot of AFL experience and replaced them with kids. Kids who need time to build mature bodies and develop. A few games I went to we has only 1 or 2 players with AFL experience against teams that 7 plus a lot of bigger bodies. That's probably one reason why we would fade out in games we could have won.
The kids we have will be better for last season and if they are going to push for AFL games, some of the ones with 2-3 years on the list need to step up and start making a statement.
I'll get along to a few games again next year, hope to catch up with you Culprit. We tend to sit up in the DTM stand.
Winning has to be secondary but that doesn't mean we don't try to win, we just try to win while developing players in the roles we want to use them at AFL level, or in developing skills to help them at AFL level.
The main reason we lost so many games this year in the VFL IMO was because we lost so much depth. We turned over a lot of AFL experience and replaced them with kids. Kids who need time to build mature bodies and develop. A few games I went to we has only 1 or 2 players with AFL experience against teams that 7 plus a lot of bigger bodies. That's probably one reason why we would fade out in games we could have won.
The kids we have will be better for last season and if they are going to push for AFL games, some of the ones with 2-3 years on the list need to step up and start making a statement.
I'll get along to a few games again next year, hope to catch up with you Culprit. We tend to sit up in the DTM stand.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
- Presti35
- Posts: 19942
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has liked: 449 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Just my opinion Tommo. I think K Pendles to GWS will happen. And I think Sundberg is a chance to get picked up somewhere. I also agree that there are better VFL players about that would get a chance before him. (One of them has already ended up at St Kilda).tommo wrote:That 100% confirmed or just what you think will happen? I personally think there are better VFL players then both of these 2, and would appear more likely to get picked up by clubs. (If that's what you mean by losing them)Presti#1Fan wrote:
Losing Sundberg will hurt alot. Losing K Pendles will hurt too.
I'd like to hang onto both Sundberg and Pendles, but it will be a task you'd imagine.
Also, I wouldnt have a problem making Sundberg the VFL captain if he were to stay.
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!